@trailofbits

Creator · trailofbits

Last updated · Aug 24, 2026

cosmos-vulnerability-scanner

REVIEW · 63Registry indexed

Scans Cosmos SDK blockchain modules and CosmWasm contracts for consensus-critical vulnerabilities — chain halts, fund loss, state divergence. 25 core + 16 IBC + 10 EVM + 3 CosmWasm patterns. Use when auditing custom x/ modules, reviewing IBC integrations, or assessing pre-launch

OpenAgentSkill Trust Score
63/100

Sandbox only

Quality85/100
Audit81/100
Stars6.8K
Verified installs0

Install targets

Codex install prompt

Install the "cosmos-vulnerability-scanner" agent skill from https://github.com/trailofbits/skills/tree/main/plugins/building-secure-contracts/skills/cosmos-vulnerability-scanner. Read its SKILL.md or equivalent instructions first, install only the files needed for this workspace, and summarize any required setup before using it. Skill purpose: Scans Cosmos SDK blockchain modules and CosmWasm contracts for consensus-critical vulnerabilities — chain halts, fund loss, state divergence. 25 core + 16 IBC + 10 EVM + 3 CosmWasm patterns. Use when auditing custom x/ modules, reviewing IBC integrations, or assessing pre-launch chain security. Updated for SDK v0.53.x. After the install attempt, report the result to https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/outcome with POST JSON {"event_id":"install_<unique-id>","skill_slug":"trailofbits-cosmos-vulnerability-scanner","task":"Install cosmos-vulnerability-scanner","agent":"codex","outcome":"success","install_used":true}. Replace event_id with a unique value and outcome with success or failed. Report success only after the skill is installed and a minimal verification passes.

Supply asset profile

Coding and developer agents

Code review, repo analysis, testing, CI, GitHub, DevOps, and developer workflow skills.

Browse track

Scenario

GitHub automation

I need my agent to triage GitHub issues, review pull requests, and summarize repository changes.

Agent fit

Claude Code + CLI + Codex

Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, CLI, or custom agents.

Install

Ready

npx skills add trailofbits/skills --skill cosmos-vulnerability-scanner

Maintenance

fresh

Pushed today

Risk

Needs review

Dependency or permission surface needs review

GitHub quality

6.8K

85/100 Quality · 71/100 Trust

Coverage tags

CodingGitHub automationsecurityagent-skill

Review notes

Dependency or permission surface needs review · Permission surface may require sandboxing

Agent adoption scorecard

Trust, audit, and install readiness at a glance

These scores combine public repository metadata, OpenAgentSkill review signals, maintenance freshness, and install readiness. They are a shortlist signal, not a replacement for human review.

Quality

Excellent
85

High-confidence pick with strong adoption and healthy maintenance signals.

Trust

Sandbox only
63

Useful candidate with missing or mixed trust signals. Keep it in an isolated workspace until the outcome loop proves task fit.

Audit

Needs review
81

A machine-readable review of install readiness, security metadata, maintenance, and adoption risk.

OpenAgentSkill Trust Score v5

Human review before install

Run only in a sandbox and compare close alternatives before using it for real work.

CodexClaude CodeCursorOpenAgentSkill CLI

Stars

6.8K GitHub stars

Repo activity

6.8K stars, 585 forks

Maintenance

Pushed today

License

CC-BY-SA-4.0

Install

npx skills add trailofbits/skills --skill cosmos-vulnerability-scanner

Install safety

standard package or runtime install path

Permission surface

secrets or environment access, shell or command execution

Agent outcomes

No agent outcome data yet

Docs

Usable metadata, review docs

Risk summary

Review before production

  • Minor inconsistency: description mentions 25 core patterns, but CHANGELOG refers to 28 core patterns. Clarify the count for accuracy.
  • Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision.
  • Quality score needs review
  • Permission surface needs review: secrets or environment access, shell or command execution

Install readiness

Install path available

  • Install path is available
  • Repository evidence is available
  • License is declared
  • No Agent Proven outcome evidence yet

Agent-readable metadata

Machine-readable decision data for this skill.

Use this block or the embedded JSON to decide whether an agent should install this skill, choose an alternative, or ask for human review first.

View technical data+

Suited tasks

  • GitHub automation workflows
  • Claude Code teams
  • teams that value GitHub adoption signals
  • Inspect repository metadata

Suited agents

CodexClaude CodeCursorOpenAgentSkill CLICLI

Install decision

Command
npx skills add trailofbits/skills --skill cosmos-vulnerability-scanner
Policy
block
Human review
yes

Trust and risk

Trust
63/100
Audit
81/100
Risk level
Needs review

Outcome loop

Endpoint
/api/agent/outcome
Event ID
resolve
Outcomes
5

Install command

npx skills add trailofbits/skills --skill cosmos-vulnerability-scanner

Do not use when

  • teams that need a vendor-supported SLA
  • production agents without a repository review
  • Minor inconsistency: description mentions 25 core patterns, but CHANGELOG refers to 28 core patterns. Clarify the count for accuracy.
  • High-risk permission hints: Shell or command execution, Secrets or environment access
  • Dependency or permission surface needs review

Agent safety v2

37/100 · Avoid automatic install

Blocked for auto-installblock

This skill should not be selected by an agent without explicit human security review.

Do not auto-install. Inspect the source, dependencies, and permission surface first.

Resolve via API

high

Shell or command execution

Skill metadata references terminal, CLI, shell, subprocess, or command execution workflows.

medium

Network access

Skill likely fetches remote pages, APIs, repositories, or external services.

medium

Filesystem access

Skill may read or write project files, documents, generated artifacts, or local workspace state.

high

Secrets or environment access

Skill metadata references credentials, tokens, environment variables, or secret-bearing workflows.

  • High-risk permission hints: Shell or command execution, Secrets or environment access
  • Dependency or permission surface needs review

Agent resolve plan

Let an agent verify fit before installing.

The Resolve API returns the selected skill, alternatives, safety policy, audit notes, install target, and copy-paste prompt an agent can follow without scraping this page.

Open text plan

Agent should check

  • Task fit and alternatives from Resolve API.
  • Audit score, trust score, and safety policy warnings.
  • Install target compatibility for Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, or CLI.

Copy prompt

Task: Use cosmos-vulnerability-scanner in this workspace.
Resolve first: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20cosmos-vulnerability-scanner%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Review install handoff: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/trailofbits-cosmos-vulnerability-scanner/install
Install command: npx skills add trailofbits/skills --skill cosmos-vulnerability-scanner
Before running it, summarize audit warnings, required permissions, and the fallback skill if install is risky.

Agent handoff

Give an agent the install path, not another directory page.

Use the public install endpoint to fetch the command, safety checklist, target prompts, and canonical links for this skill.

Open install API

Agent prompt

Use cosmos-vulnerability-scanner for this task. Review https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/trailofbits-cosmos-vulnerability-scanner/install, then install with: npx skills add trailofbits/skills --skill cosmos-vulnerability-scanner

Registry metadata

Agent-readable profile for automatic skill selection.

This page exposes the same decision, trust, audit, use-case, and install signals through the Registry API, so agents can rank this skill without scraping the UI.

Open manifest

Agent fit

97/100

GitHub automation

Platforms

Claude Code

Audit report

Needs review · 81/100

A machine-readable review of install readiness, security metadata, maintenance, and adoption risk.

View audit reportView eval report

Agent decision cockpit

Primary pick for GitHub automation

Use this as a leading candidate, then validate the README and install path in your own agent stack.

97
Readiness
Adopt
Stage

Role in stack

Primary pick

Primary fit

GitHub automation

Trust label

Production-ready

Install path

Command ready

Use when

  • GitHub automation workflows
  • Claude Code teams
  • teams that value GitHub adoption signals

Evidence

  • 6,823 GitHub stars
  • recent repository activity
  • install command or GitHub repo available
  • 85/100 quality profile
  • 3 OpenAgentSkill engagement events

review first

  • Minor inconsistency: description mentions 25 core patterns, but CHANGELOG refers to 28 core patterns. Clarify the count for accuracy.

Implementation path

  1. 1Install it in a sandbox agent and run one GitHub automation task end to end.
  2. 2Compare output quality, latency, and failure behavior against at least one alternative.
  3. 3Promote it into production only after reviewing repository permissions, license, and maintenance signals.

Trust profile

Sandbox only

Useful candidate with missing or mixed trust signals. Keep it in an isolated workspace until the outcome loop proves task fit.

63
OpenAgentSkill Trust Score

GitHub adoption

PASS

6.8K GitHub stars

Stars/forks activity

PASS

6.8K stars, 585 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata

Recent maintenance

PASS

Pushed today

License clarity

PASS

CC-BY-SA-4.0

Good signals

  • AI review approved
  • Install path is available
  • Repository evidence is available
  • Recently maintained repository
  • Large GitHub adoption signal
  • Install command has no obvious high-risk pattern
  • Outcome loop is ready but needs first real agent run

Review before install

  • Minor inconsistency: description mentions 25 core patterns, but CHANGELOG refers to 28 core patterns. Clarify the count for accuracy.
  • Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision.
  • Quality score needs review
  • Permission surface needs review: secrets or environment access, shell or command execution
  • Dependency/runtime risk: command execution surface, credential or environment access
  • Permission surface: secrets or environment access, shell or command execution
  • No real agent outcome reports yet
  • Human review required before unattended installation

Recommended action

Run only in a sandbox and compare close alternatives before using it for real work.

Quality profile

Excellent candidate for agent workflows

High-confidence pick with strong adoption and healthy maintenance signals.

85
GitHub stars
6.8K
Freshness
Today
Install ready
Yes
License
CC-BY-SA-4.0
Review before install: Minor inconsistency: description mentions 25 core patterns, but CHANGELOG refers to 28 core patterns. Clarify the count for accuracy.

Workflow fit

Use this skill in these scenarios

Workflow fit

Add it to a complete workflow

Alternative shortlist

Compare before you install

Similar skills that may fit this task.

Compare all

Overview

--- name: cosmos-vulnerability-scanner description: "Scans Cosmos SDK blockchain modules and CosmWasm contracts for consensus-critical vulnerabilities — chain halts, fund loss, state divergence. 25 core + 16 IBC + 10 EVM + 3 CosmWasm patterns. Use when auditing custom x/ modules, reviewing IBC integrations, or assessing pre-launch chain security. Updated for SDK v0.53.x." ---

# Cosmos Vulnerability Scanner

## Purpose

Scan Cosmos SDK modules and CosmWasm contracts for vulnerabilities that cause chain halts, consensus failures, or fund loss. Spawns parallel scanning agents — each specializing in a vulnerability category — that return findings to the main skill, which then writes them as individual markdown files to an output directory.

**Output directory**: defaults to `.bughunt_cosmos/`. If the user specifies a different directory in their prompt, use that instead.

## When to Use

- Auditing Cosmos SDK modules (custom `x/` modules) - Reviewing CosmWasm smart contracts - Pre-launch security assessment of Cosmos chains - Investigating chain halt incidents

## When NOT to Use

- Pure Solidity/EVM audits without Cosmos SDK — use Solidity-specific tools - CometBFT consensus engine internals — this covers SDK modules, not the consensus layer itself - General Go code review with no blockchain context - Cosmos SDK application logic that is not consensus-critical (e.g., CLI commands, REST endpoints) - CosmWasm contract-only audits on chains without custom SDK modules — use the CosmWasm checklist items alone

## Essential Principles

1. **Consensus path is king** — A bug only matters for chain halt/fund loss if it's on the consensus-critical execution path (BeginBlock, EndBlock, FinalizeBlock, msg_server handlers, AnteHandler). Always verify a finding is reachable from consensus before reporting it. 2. **State divergence = chain halt** — Any non-determinism that causes validators to compute different state roots will halt the chain. This is the highest-severity class because it affects all validators simultaneously. 3. **Check the version** — Cosmos SDK has breaking changes across major versions (v0.47 removed GetSigners, v0.50 added ABCI 2.0, v0.53 deprecated ValidateBasic). Always check `go.mod` versions before applying patterns. 4. **False positives waste audit time** — A map iteration in a CLI command is not a consensus bug. A panic in a query handler does not halt the chain. Verify the execution context before flagging. 5. **Cross-module interactions are where bugs hide** — The most severe findings (IBC reentrancy, EVM/Cosmos state desync, authz escalation) involve interactions between modules, not bugs within a single module.

## Scanning Workflow

### Phase 1: Discovery (synchronous)

**Entry**: Target codebase path provided by user. Codebase contains Go source (e.g., `x/` modules, `go.mod`) or Rust contracts with `cosmwasm_std`.

Run a **synchronous subagent** (Agent tool) with the full contents of [DISCOVERY.md](resources/DISCOVERY.md) as its prompt. The agent must:

1. Follow the Discovery workflow to explore the target codebase 2. Return the full CLAUDE.md content (the technical inventory and threat model) in its response 3. Return a structured summary with exactly these fields:

``` PLATFORM: pure-cosmos | evm | wasm (pick one; if multiple, comma-separated) IBC_ENABLED: true | false SDK_VERSION: <version from go.mod> IBC_GO_VERSION: <version from go.mod, or "n/a"> CUSTOM_MODULES: <comma-separated list of x/* modules> ```

After the subagent returns, **you** (the main skill) Write the CLAUDE.md to the target repo root. Save its path and the discovery values — these feed into Phase 2.

**Exit**: CLAUDE.md written by main skill. PLATFORM, IBC_ENABLED, SDK_VERSION, IBC_GO_VERSION, and CUSTOM_MODULES captured.

### Phase 2: Parallel Vulnerability Scan

Spawn scanning agents **in a single message** for maximum parallelism. Use the Agent Prompt Template below, filling in the reference file for each agent. Subagents only need read access (Grep, Glob, Read) — they return findings in their response and the main skill writes the files.

**Always spawn these 3 agents:**

| Agent Name | Reference File | Scope | |------------|---------------|-------| | `core-scanner` | `VULNERABILITY_PATTERNS.md` | §1-9: non-determinism, ABCI, signers, validation, handlers, ante security | | `state-scanner` | `STATE_VULNERABILITY_PATTERNS.md` | §11-23: bookkeeping, bank, pagination, events, tx replay, governance, arithmetic, encoding, deprecated modules | | `advanced-scanner` | `ADVANCED_VULNERABILITY_PATTERNS.md` | §24-27: storage keys, consensus validation, circuit breaker, crypto |

**Spawn conditionally (in the same parallel message):**

| Agent Name | Condition | Reference File | |------------|-----------|---------------| | `evm-scanner` | PLATFORM includes `evm` | `EVM_VULNERABILITY_PATTERNS.md` | | `ibc-scanner` | IBC_ENABLED is `true` | `IBC_VULNERABILITY_PATTERNS.md` | | `cosmwasm-scanner` | PLATFORM includes `wasm` | `COSMWASM_VULNERABILITY_PATTERNS.md` |

#### Agent Prompt Template

Construct each agent's prompt by replacing `{REFERENCE_FILE_PATH}` with the full path to the reference file (under `{baseDir}/resources/`) and `{CLAUDE_MD_PATH}` with the path to the CLAUDE.md written in Phase 1:

~~~ Perform a very thorough security scan of a Cosmos SDK codebase for specific vulnerability patterns.

CONTEXT: Read {CLAUDE_MD_PATH} for codebase context (SDK version, modules, threat model, key files).

PATTERNS: Read {REFERENCE_FILE_PATH} — it contains numbered vulnerability patterns. For EACH pattern: 1. Read the detection patterns and "What to Check" items 2. Use Grep and Glob to search the target codebase for each pattern 3. When a match is found, Read surrounding code to verify it's on a consensus-critical path (BeginBlock, EndBlock, FinalizeBlock, msg_server handlers, AnteHandler) 4. Classify severity per the guidelines below

RULES: - Consensus path only: Only flag code reachable from consensus-critical execution. CLI/query/test code is NOT a finding. - Check SDK version in go.mod before applying patterns (v0.47 removed GetSigners, v0.50 added ABCI 2.0, v0.53 deprecated ValidateBasic). - Always use the Grep tool for searches, not bash grep. The reference file contains search patterns — use them directly with the Grep tool. - Ignore cross-references to other resource files (e.g., links to IBC or COSMWASM patterns). Those patterns are covered by other scanning agents. - Reject these rationalizations: - "ValidateBasic catches this" — deprecated and facultative since SDK v0.53 - "Behind governance, so safe" — governance proposals can be malicious - "IBC counterparty is trusted" — any chain can open a channel - "Panic can't happen, input is validated" — trace the full call chain - "Rounding error is only a few tokens" — compounds over time, can be looped - "EVM precompile handles rollback" — many have incomplete rollback

SEVERITY: - Critical (fund loss): signer mismatch, broken bookkeeping, AnteHandler bypass, bank keeper misuse, IBC token inflation, EVM/Cosmos desync, Merkle proof forgery, arithmetic overflow - High (chain halt): non-determinism, ABCI panics, slow ABCI, non-deterministic IBC acks, consensus gaps, CacheContext event leak - Medium (DoS): unbounded pagination, tx replay, missing validation, governance spam, rate limiting, circuit breaker bypass, storage key collisions - Low (logic): rounding errors, stub handlers, event override, module ordering

OUTPUT — RETURN FORMAT: Do NOT write any files. Return ALL findings and the summary in your response.

For each pattern, return one of: §NUM PATTERN_NAME: Not applicable — [one-line reason] §NUM PATTERN_NAME: FINDING (followed by the finding block below)

For each finding, include the full content using this template:

FINDING_FILE: {SEVERITY}-s{SECTION_NUM}-{kebab-description}.md ## [SEVERITY] Title **Location**: `file:line` **Description**: What the bug is and why it matters **Vulnerable Code**: [snippet] **Attack Scenario**: [numbered steps] **Recommendation**: How to fix **References**: [links to relevant advisories or building-secure-contracts]

You MUST report on ALL patterns in the reference file — do not skip any. ~~~

**Exit**: All scanning agents returned. Each reported on every pattern in their reference file.

### Phase 3: Write Findings

After all scanning agents return, write finding files to the output directory (default `.bughunt_cosmos/`):

1. Parse each agent's response for `FINDING_FILE:` blocks 2. For each finding, Write the content to `{OUTPUT_DIR}/{filename}` using the filename from `FINDING_FILE:` 3. Create the output directory first if it doesn't exist

### Phase 4: Verify Completeness

After writing all findings, verify every pattern was assessed:

1. Collect the summary lines (§NUM entries) returned by each agent 2. Check pattern counts against expected totals: - `core-scanner`: 8 patterns (§1-9, excluding §8 legacy-only) - `state-scanner`: 13 patterns (§11-23) - `advanced-scanner`: 4 patterns (§24-27) - `evm-scanner` (if spawned): 10 patterns (§1-10) - `ibc-scanner` (if spawned): 16 patterns (§1-16) - `cosmwasm-scanner` (if spawned): 3 patterns (§1-3) 3. If any pattern is missing from a summary, flag it and re-prompt that agent 4. List all finding files written to the output directory with a `Glob` for `*.md`

**Exit**: All patterns accounted for. Finding files listed for the user.

---

## Success Criteria

- [ ] Discovery CLAUDE.md written with complete technical inventory and threat model - [ ] All scanning agents completed and reported on every pattern in their reference file - [ ] Pattern counts verified against expected totals (no patterns skipped) - [ ] All findings written to output directory as individual markdown files - [ ] Each finding file includes: severity, location, vulnerable code, attack scenario, recommendation

---

## Resources

- **Discovery & CLAUDE.md**: [DISCOVERY.md](resources/DISCOVERY.md) - **Core patterns (§1-9)**: [VULNERABILITY_PATTERNS.md](resources/VULNERABILITY_PATTERNS.md) - **State & module patterns (§11-23)**: [STATE_VULNERABILITY_PATTERNS.md](resources/STATE_VULNERABILITY_PATTERNS.md) - **Advanced patterns (§24-27)**: [ADVANCED_VULNERABILITY_PATTERNS.md](resources/ADVANCED_VULNERABILITY_PATTERNS.md) - **IBC vulnerabilities**: [IBC_VULNERABILITY_PATTERNS.md](resources/IBC_VULNERABILITY_PATTERNS.md) - **CosmWasm vulnerabilities**: [COSMWASM_VULNERABILITY_PATTERNS.md](resources/COSMWASM_VULNERABILITY_PATTERNS.md) - **EVM vulnerabilities**: [EVM_VULNERABILITY_PATTERNS.md](resources/EVM_VULNERABILITY_PATTERNS.md) - **Building Secure Contracts**: `building-secure-contracts/not-so-smart-contracts/cosmos/` - **Cosmos SDK Docs**: https://docs.cosmos.network/ - **CodeQL for Cosmos SDK**: https://github.com/crypto-com/cosmos-sdk-codeql

Technical details

Version
1.0.0
License
CC-BY-SA-4.0
Last updated
Aug 24, 2026
Published
Aug 24, 2026

Decision snapshot

Primary pick

97
Ready
Adopt
Stage

6,823 GitHub stars

Audit

Install review

Install and adoption review

81
Needs review
Security
72/100
Maintenance
100/100
Install
92/100
Open full auditView eval report

Agent-proven evidence

Agent-proven evidence

Outcome reports after resolve, review, install, and one narrow run.

0
Proven
Needs first agent runAuto-install: review firstLast: Unknown
Success rate
Recent failure
Outcomes
0
Output quality
Failed
0
Not relevant
0
Installs
0
Risk blocked
0
Setup needed
0
Production
0

No agent outcome data yet. The first agent run can report success, setup needs, risk blocks, failure, or not-relevant through /api/agent/outcome.

Install

Add to agent workflow

Free and open source. Review the report before installing into production agents.

Growth loop

Share kit

X

Scenario-led draft for cosmos-vulnerability-scanner, ready for a manual X post.

Curator note
cosmos-vulnerability-scanner: Scans Cosmos SDK blockchain modules and CosmWasm contracts for consensus-critical vulnerabili...

6.8K stars

https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/trailofbits-cosmos-vulnerability-scanner?ref=x
Open X draft
Optional reply with install command
Listing + install path for cosmos-vulnerability-scanner:
https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/trailofbits-cosmos-vulnerability-scanner?ref=x

Install: npx skills add trailofbits/skills --skill cosmos-vulnerability-scanner

Listing source

Registry indexed

Claimable

This listing was indexed from public sources and is not marked official until a maintainer claim is approved.

Indexed by
OpenAgentSkill community index

Attribution links to the public repository or creator profile. Creators can claim the listing to update ownership signals.

Claim this skill

Owner claim

Claim this skill listing

This Registry indexed listing is attributed to trailofbits but is not marked official yet. Claim it to add a verified owner signal and make future launch, install, and audit updates easier to trust.

Creator backlink kit

Add the evidence badges to your README

Show the canonical listing, current trust and audit signals, and real Agent-Proven evidence where developers evaluate the repository.

[![Listed on OpenAgentSkill](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/trailofbits-cosmos-vulnerability-scanner?metric=listed&label=Listed)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/trailofbits-cosmos-vulnerability-scanner)
[![OpenAgentSkill Trust](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/trailofbits-cosmos-vulnerability-scanner?metric=trust&label=Trust)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/trailofbits-cosmos-vulnerability-scanner)
[![OpenAgentSkill Audit](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/trailofbits-cosmos-vulnerability-scanner?metric=audit&label=Audit)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/trailofbits-cosmos-vulnerability-scanner/audit)
[![Agent Proven](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/trailofbits-cosmos-vulnerability-scanner?metric=proven&label=Agent%20Proven)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/trailofbits-cosmos-vulnerability-scanner)

Author

T

trailofbits

@trailofbits

Platform fit

Health signals

GitHub stars
6.8K
Quality score
50/100
Last GitHub push
Aug 24, 2026
Framework hints
Unknown
OpenAgentSkill views
3
Install copies
0
Outbound clicks
0

Community signal

Share whether this skill looks useful for your agent workflow. Aggregated feedback improves rankings over time.

Trust & safety

Sandbox only

63
  • GitHub adoption6.8K GitHub starsPASS
  • Stars/forks activity6.8K stars, 585 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadataPASS
  • Recent maintenancePushed todayPASS
  • License clarityCC-BY-SA-4.0PASS
  • README/SKILL.md completenessPublic metadata needs stronger README/SKILL.md contextINFO
  • Dependency/runtime riskcommand execution surface, credential or environment accessCHECK