delivery-discipline

审查 · 59
已收录

Use when preparing or writing any committable deliverable (phase closeout, status report, skill file, wave spec, README section, summary document, CHANGELOG entry, or any markdown file declaring completion or pass/fail status). Applies before the write happens, not after. Without

Verified installs0
Stars16
版本1.0.0
质量59/100 · 有潜力
信任59/100 · Do not auto-install
审计74/100 · 需审查

供给资产档案

研究与知识工作

Deep research, source comparison, literature review, RAG, knowledge search, and reports.

浏览赛道

场景

研究 Agent

I need my agent to research a topic, compare sources, and produce a concise report.

适配 Agent

Claude Code + CLI + Codex

适用于 Codex、Claude Code、Cursor、CLI 或自定义 Agent。

安装

就绪

npx skills add th3vib3coder/vibe-science --skill delivery-discipline

维护状态

新鲜

距上次推送 3 天

风险

需审查

Permission surface may require sandboxing

GitHub 质量

16

59/100 质量 · 67/100 信任

覆盖标签

研究研究 Agentagent-skill

审查说明

Permission surface may require sandboxing · The SKILL.md excerpt is truncated at the end, but the visible content is complete enough for review.

Agent 采用评分卡

一眼查看信任、审计与安装准备度

这些分数综合公开仓库元数据、OpenAgentSkill 审查信号、维护新鲜度与安装准备度。它用于候选筛选,不替代人工审查。

质量

有潜力
59

有用的候选项,但采用前应与替代方案比较。

信任

Do not auto-install
59

Trust Score v5 found insufficient evidence for agent installation. Treat this as discovery material, not an executable recommendation.

审计

需审查
74

对安装准备度、安全元数据、维护情况与采用风险的机器可读审查。

OpenAgentSkill 信任评分 v5

安装前需人工审查

Choose a stronger alternative or inspect the source manually before any install attempt.

CodexClaude CodeCursorOpenAgentSkill CLI

Stars

16 个 GitHub Stars

仓库活跃度

16 个 Star,0 个 Fork

维护状态

距上次推送 3 天

许可证

Apache-2.0

安装

npx skills add th3vib3coder/vibe-science --skill delivery-discipline

安装安全性

标准软件包或运行时安装路径

权限范围

filesystem or document access, network or browser access

Agent 结果

暂未有 Agent 结果数据

文档

README/SKILL.md 上下文充分

风险摘要

生产前审查

  • The SKILL.md excerpt is truncated at the end, but the visible content is complete enough for review.
  • Low GitHub adoption signal
  • Quality score needs review
  • Permission surface needs review: filesystem or document access, network or browser access

安装准备度

安装路径可用

  • 安装路径可用
  • 仓库证据可用
  • 已声明许可证
  • 暂无 Agent 验证结果证据

Agent 可读元数据

这个 Skill 的机器可读决策数据。

使用此区块或内嵌 JSON 判断 Agent 是否应安装该 Skill、选择替代方案,或先请求人工审查。

打开 JSON

适用任务

  • 研究 Agent 工作流
  • Claude Code 团队
  • builders willing to evaluate younger projects
  • 检索来源

适用 Agent

CodexClaude CodeCursorOpenAgentSkill CLICLI

安装决策

命令
npx skills add th3vib3coder/vibe-science --skill delivery-discipline
策略
审查
人工审查

信任与风险

信任
59/100
审计
74/100
风险级别
需审查

结果闭环

端点
/api/agent/outcome
事件 ID
resolve
结果
5

安装命令

npx skills add th3vib3coder/vibe-science --skill delivery-discipline

不适用场景

  • 需要厂商支持 SLA 的团队
  • production agents without a repository review
  • Low GitHub adoption signal
  • The SKILL.md excerpt is truncated at the end, but the visible content is complete enough for review.
  • 暂未有 OpenAgentSkill 使用反馈数据

Agent 安全 v2

50/100 · 避免自动安装

实验性审查

Sparse or mixed signals. Useful for discovery, but not for autonomous installation.

Test manually in an isolated workspace and compare against safer alternatives.

通过 API 解析

Browser automation

Skill may drive a browser or interact with web pages.

网络访问

Skill 可能访问远程页面、API、仓库或外部服务。

文件系统访问

Skill 可能读取或写入项目文件、文档、生成产物或本地工作区状态。

数据库访问

Skill 可能检查 Schema、查询数据库或处理持久化存储。

  • Permission surface may require sandboxing

安装目标

在你的 Agent 工作流中安装此 Skill

通过公开安装端点获取命令、安全清单、目标提示词和该 Skill 的规范链接。

skill install

OpenAgentSkill CLI

Resolve policy, run the source installer safely, and report a verified install receipt.

$ npx --yes https://github.com/Leon-Drq/openagentskill/releases/download/cli-v0.2.1/openagentskill-0.2.1.tgz install th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline

Agent 解析计划

让 Agent 在安装前验证匹配度。

Resolve API 返回首选 Skill、替代方案、安全策略、审计说明、安装目标和可直接执行的提示词,无需抓取此页面。

打开文本计划

Agent 应检查

  • 从 Resolve API 检查任务匹配与替代方案。
  • 检查审计评分、信任评分和安全策略警告。
  • 检查 Codex、Claude Code、Cursor 或 CLI 的安装目标兼容性。

复制提示词

Task: Use delivery-discipline in this workspace.
Resolve first: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20delivery-discipline%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Review install handoff: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline/install
Install command: npx skills add th3vib3coder/vibe-science --skill delivery-discipline
Before running it, summarize audit warnings, required permissions, and the fallback skill if install is risky.

Agent 交接

把安装路径交给 Agent,而不是再给一个目录页。

通过公开安装端点获取命令、安全清单、目标提示词和该 Skill 的规范链接。

打开安装 API

Agent 提示词

Use delivery-discipline for this task. Review https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline/install, then install with: npx skills add th3vib3coder/vibe-science --skill delivery-discipline

Registry 元数据

用于自动选择 Skill 的 Agent 可读档案。

本页通过 Registry API 提供相同的决策、信任、审计、场景和安装信号,让 Agent 无需抓取界面即可排序。

打开 Manifest

适配 Agent

58/100

研究 Agent

平台

Claude Code

审计报告

需审查 · 74/100

对安装准备度、安全元数据、维护情况与采用风险的机器可读审查。

查看审计报告查看评估报告

Agent 决策面板

Fallback candidate for Research agents

先用此 Skill 做原型验证,并保留备选方案。

58
就绪度
原型验证
阶段

栈中角色

备选候选

主要匹配

研究 Agent

信任标签

先做原型验证

安装路径

命令已就绪

适用场景

  • 研究 Agent 工作流
  • Claude Code 团队
  • builders willing to evaluate younger projects

证据

  • 仓库近期活跃
  • 已提供安装命令或 GitHub 仓库
  • 59/100 质量档案

先审查

  • Low GitHub adoption signal
  • The SKILL.md excerpt is truncated at the end, but the visible content is complete enough for review.
  • 暂未有 OpenAgentSkill 使用反馈数据

实施路径

  1. 1在沙盒 Agent 中安装它,并端到端完成一次研究 Agent任务。
  2. 2Compare output quality, latency, and failure behavior against at least one alternative.
  3. 3Promote it into production only after reviewing repository permissions, license, and maintenance signals.

信任档案

Do not auto-install

Trust Score v5 found insufficient evidence for agent installation. Treat this as discovery material, not an executable recommendation.

59
OpenAgentSkill 信任评分

GitHub 采用度

修复

16 个 GitHub Stars

Star/Fork 活跃度

修复

16 个 Star,0 个 Fork; 当前元数据中没有议题活跃度信息

近期维护

通过

距上次推送 3 天

许可证清晰度

通过

Apache-2.0

积极信号

  • AI 审查已通过
  • 安装路径可用
  • 仓库证据可用
  • 近期维护的仓库
  • 安装命令未发现明显高风险模式
  • 结果闭环已就绪,但需要首次真实 Agent 运行

安装前审查

  • The SKILL.md excerpt is truncated at the end, but the visible content is complete enough for review.
  • Low GitHub adoption signal
  • Quality score needs review
  • Permission surface needs review: filesystem or document access, network or browser access
  • GitHub adoption: 16 GitHub stars
  • Stars/forks activity: 16 stars, 0 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
  • Permission surface: filesystem or document access, network or browser access
  • 暂未有真实 Agent 结果报告
  • 无人值守安装前需要人工审查

建议操作

Choose a stronger alternative or inspect the source manually before any install attempt.

质量档案

有潜力 适用于 Agent 工作流的候选

有用的候选项,但采用前应与替代方案比较。

59
GitHub Stars
16
新鲜度
3 天前
安装就绪
许可证
Apache-2.0
安装前审查: Low GitHub adoption signal · The SKILL.md excerpt is truncated at the end, but the visible content is complete enough for review.

工作流匹配

在这些场景使用此 Skill

工作流匹配

加入完整工作流

替代方案短名单

安装前对比

可能适合该任务的相近 Skill。

对比全部

概览

--- name: delivery-discipline description: Use when preparing or writing any committable deliverable (phase closeout, status report, skill file, wave spec, README section, summary document, CHANGELOG entry, or any markdown file declaring completion or pass/fail status). Applies before the write happens, not after. Without this discipline, agents ship 60% deliverables and declare closure prematurely. ---

<!-- delivery-discipline: exempt --> <!-- This file DEFINES the delivery-discipline. It is documentation about the discipline, not a closeout declaration subject to it. The exemption is legitimate and is logged as `delivery_discipline_exemption_used` by Wave 4 so exemption usage remains auditable. Do not remove this comment unless you are replacing SKILL.md with a proper attestation block. -->

# Delivery Discipline

## Overview

**Agents trained to optimize for completion will ship 60% of what's needed and declare the work closed.** The pattern is reproducible. Scientific truth is protected by the existing hooks (confounder harness, R2 review gate, Salvagente Rule). **Delivery completeness is not.** This skill closes that gap.

You (the agent) must apply the 4 rules below BEFORE writing any deliverable that will declare anything CLOSED, PASS, DONE, SHIPPED, COMPLETE, FINALIZED, or READY in a commit-relevant markdown file. A PreToolUse hook will block your write if you skip the attestation block defined below. A CI validator will catch bypasses.

## When To Use

**Activate before writing:** - Any `*closeout*.md`, `*status*.md`, `*summary*.md`, `*verdict*.md` - Any `phase*-*.md`, `wave*-*.md`, `sprint*-*.md` - Any `skill*.md`, SKILL.md updates - Any `README.md` or `CHANGELOG.md` entry that declares a version/release/completion - Any document declaring a gate PASS, a phase CLOSED, a release SHIPPED

**Do NOT activate for:** - Normal prose that mentions "done" in casual context ("I closed the file") - Code files (`.js`, `.py`, etc.) — the skill governs deliverables, not source - Exploratory notes that do NOT declare closure

## The 4 Non-Negotiable Rules

### Rule 1 — Surface mapping before writing

Before you write a deliverable that will declare anything CLOSED / PASS / DONE / SHIPPED / COMPLETE, you MUST have a mechanical inventory of what should be covered.

- If the inventory was produced by a subagent (Explore, general-purpose, etc.), you **verify at least the critical claims directly** before trusting it. Read the actual files the subagent describes. API signatures, file paths, function exports get verified first-hand, not assumed. - Optimistic sampling is failure. "I covered the main cases" means you haven't looked at the edge cases.

### Rule 2 — Explicit scope cuts

Every deliverable MUST declare, in its own body, what was LEFT OUT and why.

- A scope-cut list of 0 items is suspicious by default. If your solution covers "everything", you probably haven't looked hard enough. - Force yourself to name at least one cut. If you genuinely cannot find one, state that explicitly and pass self-review (Rule 4) first.

### Rule 3 — Completeness proof by enumeration

When you declare closure, list the concrete items verified. Not "all tests pass" but "26 items in the surface map, 22 verified directly with Read tool, 4 delegated to subagent report and cross-checked". Enumeration beats summary.

### Rule 4 — Adversarial self-review before closure

Before you write "CLOSED" / "PASS" / "DONE", ask yourself: **"What would a skeptical reviewer attack?"** List at least 3 findings. If you find 0, assume you haven't looked hard enough and go back to Rule 1.

## The Attestation Block (MUST appear in every deliverable declaring closure)

Format: a `## Delivery Attestation` section (case-insensitive, `##` or `###`) containing a fenced `json` block. The hook extracts the first fenced json block under that heading and validates it against `skills/vibe/assets/schemas/delivery-attestation.schema.json`.

````markdown ## Delivery Attestation

```json { "covered": [ "Concrete item 1 verified (not a summary)", "Concrete item 2 verified", "..." ], "scope_cuts": [ { "item": "Thing left out of this deliverable", "reason": "Why it is outside this deliverable (not 'no time')" } ], "self_review_findings": [ "Adversarial finding 1 (a skeptical reviewer would attack X because...)", "Adversarial finding 2", "Adversarial finding 3" ], "external_review_status": "pending" } ``` ````

**Field semantics:** - `covered`: array of strings, ≥1 item, each ≥3 chars. Concrete items, not summaries. - `scope_cuts`: array of `{item, reason}` objects. Empty array allowed but suspicious. - `self_review_findings`: array of strings, **≥3 items required**, each ≥20 chars. - `external_review_status`: enum `"pending" | "cleared" | "blocked"`.

## Quick Reference

| Intent | Action | |--------|--------| | Writing a phase closeout | Include the `## Delivery Attestation` section with filled JSON block | | Writing a skill file | Include attestation even if short skill — the skill itself is a deliverable | | Updating CHANGELOG | Attestation required when declaring a release / version | | Updating README status section | Attestation required when declaring pass/fail or coverage | | Exempting a file legitimately | Add `<!-- delivery-discipline: exempt -->` comment near the top. Wave 4 will log this as a `delivery_discipline_exemption_used` governance event; frequent use becomes an audit target at that point. |

## Rationalization Table — DO NOT fall for these

| Excuse | Counter | |--------|---------| | "This is just a small doc, discipline is overkill" | Small docs are where premature closure starts. The attestation takes 60 seconds. | | "I don't have time for scope cuts" | The cut list takes 30 seconds. Skipping it costs 30 minutes when user pushes back. | | "Self-review feels self-indulgent" | It's the cheap version of R2. Skip it and you pay in R2 corrections later. | | "The block only triggers on 'CLOSED' — I'll say 'finalized' instead" | The regex covers synonyms: CLOSED, DONE, PASS/PASSED, SHIPPED, COMPLETE/COMPLETED, FINALIZED, READY, and the failure/partial forms FAIL/FAILED, BLOCKED, PARTIAL, FALSE-POSITIVE, and the review-verdict forms ACCEPTED, REJECTED. Wave 4 will log attempted evasions as governance events; until then, the block itself is the sanction. | | "I'll put my closure claim below the legacy-boundary marker in CHANGELOG/README" | The legacy-boundary marker grandfathers pre-Phase-8 content ONLY while its `hash=<sha256-hex>` attribute matches the LF-normalized below-marker content. Appending any new closure below the marker changes the hash, the boundary becomes invalid, and the whole file is re-subjected to enforcement. To legitimately re-bless the legacy region you must update the hash in a reviewed commit (git diff shows both the new content and the hash change side-by-side). Bare markers without `hash=` are rejected outright. | | "I verified with a subagent, that's enough" | Subagents sample too. Spot-check critical items with Read tool before trusting. | | "External review status: cleared" (without actually running review) | Lying about `external_review_status` is still traceable — when R2 / R3 runs later, it produces `external-review-record` entries that do NOT match, and the inconsistency surfaces at the next audit. The Wave 3 CI validator checks schema shape (enum + required fields); full governance-event cross-referencing is Phase 8.1 scope, not Wave 3. Don't rely on "nobody will notice" — the record trail is public. | | "I'll add the attestation at the end, after writing everything" | Writing the attestation FORCES you to enumerate. Skipping that step defeats the whole point. Write it as you go, not as an afterthought. |

## Red Flags — STOP and apply the skill

- About to write a deliverable containing "CLOSED", "PASS", "DONE", "SHIPPED", "COMPLETE", or synonyms in declarative context - About to mark a TodoWrite task `completed` after a large deliverable - About to stop the session with a "here's what I did" summary - About to commit a markdown file whose name matches `*closeout*`, `*status*`, `*summary*`, `*verdict*`, `*phase*`, `*wave*`, `*skill*`, `readme`, `changelog` - About to declare a release or version bump

**All of these mean: stop, map the surface, declare scope cuts, write the attestation block, then continue.**

## Common Mistakes

- **Fake attestation**: filling fields with generic strings ("looked at everything"). Wave 2 hook enforces minLength + minItems on the attestation block at write time. Wave 3 CI validator will re-enforce schema shape on tracked markdown at commit time. Full audit-log cross-reference (checking whether `external_review_status: "cleared"` matches a real R2/R3 review record in `governance_events`) is Phase 8.1 scope, not Wave 3. Don't assume the current enforcement catches semantic lies — it catches structural ones. - **Skipping scope_cuts because "nothing was cut"**: if you genuinely cut nothing, you probably didn't look hard enough. Use the self-review step to find a scope cut. - **Putting attestation in a comment or footer**: it must be in a `## Delivery Attestation` section with a fenced json block. Other placements won't be parsed. - **Writing attestation as YAML or markdown list**: must be fenced `json` block. Other formats fail schema validation. - **Adding exemption comment to bypass**: exemptions ARE allowed and don't block. Wave 4 will log each use as a `delivery_discipline_exemption_used` governance event; frequent use becomes an audit target once that logging is live. Strict mode (`VIBE_SCIENCE_STRICT=1`) additionally refuses to allow any bypass path (including exemption) when the governance DB cannot be opened or when the `governance_events` table is missing — i.e. when the Wave 4 audit trail would silently drop records. The strict-mode probe actually opens the DB and checks the schema, not just whether the module imports.

## Why This Exists

vibe-science v7.0 protects scientific truth (confounder harness, R2 gate, Salvagente Rule). It did NOT protect delivery completeness — agents could still ship 60% skills, declare phases closed prematurely, sample the surface optimistically.

The pattern was observed repeatedly: Phase 6.1 "closed" but re-retracted when fresh-eyes review found P1s. Phase 7 Wave 1 shipped at 60%. The initial Phase 8 skill was missing 40% of the surface.

This skill (Wave 1) + the PreToolUse hook (Wave 2) + the CI validator (Wave 3) + the governance event log (Wave 4) **together force the same discipline on delivery that the existing hooks force on scientific claims**. Wave 2 enforcement is active today: a hook that blocks the write, not a review that catches the failure after the fact. Waves 3-4 add CI-time scanning and audit-trail logging so bypass attempts become tracked events rather than silent drift.

## When in Doubt

Apply the rules. The cost is 60-120 seconds per deliverable. The cost of skipping is the "user pushes back → retract → patch" cycle we've seen multiple times.

Default: write the attestation. It's cheaper than the correction loop.

技术详情

版本
1.0.0
许可证
Apache-2.0
最近更新
2026年8月20日
发布时间
2026年8月20日

决策摘要

备选候选

58
就绪
原型验证
阶段

仓库近期活跃

审计

安装审查

安装与采用审查

74
需审查
安全性
77/100
维护状态
100/100
安装
92/100
打开完整审计查看评估报告

Agent 验证证据

Agent 验证证据

来自解析、审查、安装和一次小范围运行后的结果报告。

0
已验证
Needs first agent run自动安装: 先审查最近: 未知
成功率
近期失败
结果
0
输出质量
失败
0
不相关
0
安装次数
0
风险拦截
0
需要配置
0
生产环境
0

暂时没有 Agent 结果数据。首次 Agent 执行可以通过 /api/agent/outcome 报告成功、需要设置、风险拦截、失败或不相关。

安装

加入 Agent 工作流

免费且开源. 在生产 Agent 中安装前请先审查报告。

增长闭环

分享工具包

X

为 delivery-discipline 准备的场景化草稿,可手动发布到 X。

策展说明
delivery-discipline: Use when preparing or writing any committable deliverable (phase closeout, status report, ski...

16 stars

https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline?ref=x
打开 X 草稿
可选:带安装命令的回复
Listing + install path for delivery-discipline:
https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline?ref=x

Install: npx skills add th3vib3coder/vibe-science --skill delivery-discipline
打开回复草稿

收录来源

Registry 收录

可认领

此列表来自公开来源,维护者认领获批前不会标记为官方。

创作者
th3vib3coder
收录方
OpenAgentSkill 社区索引

归属链接指向公开仓库或创作者主页。创作者可认领列表以更新所有权信号。

认领此 Skill

所有者认领

认领此 Skill 页面

这条 Registry 收录 列表归属于 th3vib3coder,但尚未标记为官方。认领后可增加已验证所有者信号,使后续发布、安装和审计更新更值得信赖。

创作者外链工具包

将证据徽章加入你的 README

在开发者评估仓库的位置展示规范页面、当前信任与审计信号,以及真实的 Agent 验证证据。

[![Listed on OpenAgentSkill](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline?metric=listed&label=Listed)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline)
[![OpenAgentSkill Trust](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline?metric=trust&label=Trust)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline)
[![OpenAgentSkill Audit](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline?metric=audit&label=Audit)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline/audit)
[![Agent Proven](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline?metric=proven&label=Agent%20Proven)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/th3vib3coder-delivery-discipline)

作者

T

th3vib3coder

@th3vib3coder

平台适配

健康信号

GitHub Stars
16
质量评分
32/100
最近 GitHub 推送
2026年8月19日
框架提示
未知
OpenAgentSkill 浏览量
0
复制安装命令
0
跳转点击
0

社区信号

告诉我们这个 Skill 是否对你的 Agent 工作流有帮助。汇总反馈会持续改善排序。

信任与安全

Do not auto-install

59
  • GitHub 采用度16 个 GitHub Stars修复
  • Star/Fork 活跃度16 个 Star,0 个 Fork; 当前元数据中没有议题活跃度信息修复
  • 近期维护距上次推送 3 天通过
  • 许可证清晰度Apache-2.0通过
  • README/SKILL.md 完整度元数据包含足够的用法与工作流上下文通过
  • 依赖与运行时风险network or browser surface通过