unslop

审查 · 63
已收录

Cut AI tells from any writing. Must always apply.

Verified installs0
Stars19
版本1.0.0
质量60/100 · 有潜力
信任63/100 · 仅限沙盒
审计76/100 · 需审查

供给资产档案

研究与知识工作

Deep research, source comparison, literature review, RAG, knowledge search, and reports.

浏览赛道

场景

RAG and knowledge

I need my agent to build a RAG workflow over documents and retrieve reliable context.

适配 Agent

Claude Code + CLI + Codex

适用于 Codex、Claude Code、Cursor、CLI 或自定义 Agent。

安装

就绪

npx skills add sero-labs/sero --skill unslop

维护状态

新鲜

距上次推送 3 天

风险

需审查

Permission surface may require sandboxing

GitHub 质量

19

60/100 质量 · 71/100 信任

覆盖标签

研究RAG and knowledge自动化agent-skill

审查说明

Permission surface may require sandboxing · Low GitHub adoption signal

Agent 采用评分卡

一眼查看信任、审计与安装准备度

这些分数综合公开仓库元数据、OpenAgentSkill 审查信号、维护新鲜度与安装准备度。它用于候选筛选,不替代人工审查。

质量

有潜力
60

有用的候选项,但采用前应与替代方案比较。

信任

仅限沙盒
63

有用但信任信号不足或混杂的候选项。在结果闭环证明任务匹配前,请保持在隔离工作区内使用。

审计

需审查
76

对安装准备度、安全元数据、维护情况与采用风险的机器可读审查。

OpenAgentSkill 信任评分 v5

安装前需人工审查

仅在沙盒中运行,并在用于真实工作前比较接近的替代方案。

CodexClaude CodeCursorOpenAgentSkill CLI

Stars

19 个 GitHub Stars

仓库活跃度

19 个 Star,1 个 Fork

维护状态

距上次推送 3 天

许可证

Apache-2.0

安装

npx skills add sero-labs/sero --skill unslop

安装安全性

标准软件包或运行时安装路径

权限范围

filesystem or document access, network or browser access

Agent 结果

暂未有 Agent 结果数据

文档

Usable metadata, review docs

风险摘要

生产前审查

  • Low GitHub adoption signal
  • Quality score needs review
  • Permission surface needs review: filesystem or document access, network or browser access
  • GitHub adoption: 19 GitHub stars

安装准备度

安装路径可用

  • 安装路径可用
  • 仓库证据可用
  • 已声明许可证
  • 暂无 Agent 验证结果证据

Agent 可读元数据

这个 Skill 的机器可读决策数据。

使用此区块或内嵌 JSON 判断 Agent 是否应安装该 Skill、选择替代方案,或先请求人工审查。

打开 JSON

适用任务

  • Browser automation 工作流
  • Claude Code 团队
  • builders willing to evaluate younger projects
  • Navigate pages

适用 Agent

CodexClaude CodeCursorOpenAgentSkill CLICLI

安装决策

命令
npx skills add sero-labs/sero --skill unslop
策略
审查
人工审查

信任与风险

信任
63/100
审计
76/100
风险级别
需审查

结果闭环

端点
/api/agent/outcome
事件 ID
resolve
结果
5

安装命令

npx skills add sero-labs/sero --skill unslop

不适用场景

  • 需要厂商支持 SLA 的团队
  • production agents without a repository review
  • Low GitHub adoption signal
  • Permission surface may require sandboxing
  • Quality score needs review

Agent 安全 v2

56/100 · 安装前审查

实验性审查

Sparse or mixed signals. Useful for discovery, but not for autonomous installation.

Test manually in an isolated workspace and compare against safer alternatives.

通过 API 解析

网络访问

Skill 可能访问远程页面、API、仓库或外部服务。

文件系统访问

Skill 可能读取或写入项目文件、文档、生成产物或本地工作区状态。

数据库访问

Skill 可能检查 Schema、查询数据库或处理持久化存储。

  • Permission surface may require sandboxing

安装目标

在你的 Agent 工作流中安装此 Skill

通过公开安装端点获取命令、安全清单、目标提示词和该 Skill 的规范链接。

skill install

OpenAgentSkill CLI

Resolve policy, run the source installer safely, and report a verified install receipt.

$ npx --yes https://github.com/Leon-Drq/openagentskill/releases/download/cli-v0.2.1/openagentskill-0.2.1.tgz install sero-labs-unslop

Agent 解析计划

让 Agent 在安装前验证匹配度。

Resolve API 返回首选 Skill、替代方案、安全策略、审计说明、安装目标和可直接执行的提示词,无需抓取此页面。

打开文本计划

Agent 应检查

  • 从 Resolve API 检查任务匹配与替代方案。
  • 检查审计评分、信任评分和安全策略警告。
  • 检查 Codex、Claude Code、Cursor 或 CLI 的安装目标兼容性。

复制提示词

Task: Use unslop in this workspace.
Resolve first: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20unslop%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Review install handoff: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/sero-labs-unslop/install
Install command: npx skills add sero-labs/sero --skill unslop
Before running it, summarize audit warnings, required permissions, and the fallback skill if install is risky.

Agent 交接

把安装路径交给 Agent,而不是再给一个目录页。

通过公开安装端点获取命令、安全清单、目标提示词和该 Skill 的规范链接。

打开安装 API

Agent 提示词

Use unslop for this task. Review https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/sero-labs-unslop/install, then install with: npx skills add sero-labs/sero --skill unslop

Registry 元数据

用于自动选择 Skill 的 Agent 可读档案。

本页通过 Registry API 提供相同的决策、信任、审计、场景和安装信号,让 Agent 无需抓取界面即可排序。

打开 Manifest

适配 Agent

59/100

Browser automation

平台

Claude Code

审计报告

需审查 · 76/100

对安装准备度、安全元数据、维护情况与采用风险的机器可读审查。

查看审计报告查看评估报告

Agent 决策面板

Fallback candidate for Browser automation

先用此 Skill 做原型验证,并保留备选方案。

59
就绪度
原型验证
阶段

栈中角色

备选候选

主要匹配

Browser automation

信任标签

先做原型验证

安装路径

命令已就绪

适用场景

  • Browser automation 工作流
  • Claude Code 团队
  • builders willing to evaluate younger projects

证据

  • 仓库近期活跃
  • 已提供安装命令或 GitHub 仓库
  • 60/100 质量档案
  • 1 个 OpenAgentSkill 交互事件

先审查

  • Low GitHub adoption signal

实施路径

  1. 1在沙盒 Agent 中安装它,并端到端完成一次Browser automation任务。
  2. 2Compare output quality, latency, and failure behavior against at least one alternative.
  3. 3Promote it into production only after reviewing repository permissions, license, and maintenance signals.

信任档案

仅限沙盒

有用但信任信号不足或混杂的候选项。在结果闭环证明任务匹配前,请保持在隔离工作区内使用。

63
OpenAgentSkill 信任评分

GitHub 采用度

修复

19 个 GitHub Stars

Star/Fork 活跃度

修复

19 个 Star,1 个 Fork; 当前元数据中没有议题活跃度信息

近期维护

通过

距上次推送 3 天

许可证清晰度

通过

Apache-2.0

积极信号

  • AI 审查已通过
  • 安装路径可用
  • 仓库证据可用
  • 近期维护的仓库
  • 安装命令未发现明显高风险模式
  • 结果闭环已就绪,但需要首次真实 Agent 运行

安装前审查

  • Low GitHub adoption signal
  • Quality score needs review
  • Permission surface needs review: filesystem or document access, network or browser access
  • GitHub adoption: 19 GitHub stars
  • Stars/forks activity: 19 stars, 1 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
  • Permission surface: filesystem or document access, network or browser access
  • 暂未有真实 Agent 结果报告
  • 无人值守安装前需要人工审查

建议操作

仅在沙盒中运行,并在用于真实工作前比较接近的替代方案。

质量档案

有潜力 适用于 Agent 工作流的候选

有用的候选项,但采用前应与替代方案比较。

60
GitHub Stars
19
新鲜度
3 天前
安装就绪
许可证
Apache-2.0
安装前审查: Low GitHub adoption signal

工作流匹配

在这些场景使用此 Skill

工作流匹配

加入完整工作流

替代方案短名单

安装前对比

可能适合该任务的相近 Skill。

对比全部

概览

--- name: unslop description: Cut AI tells from any writing. Must always apply. ---

# Unslop

Edit text to remove AI patterns and add human voice.

## Process

1. Scan for the patterns below. 2. Rewrite. Preserve meaning, match intended tone. 3. Add soul (see next section). 4. Self-audit: "What makes this obviously AI generated?" Fix remaining tells.

## Adding soul

Removing patterns is half the job. Sterile, voiceless writing is just as obvious.

- **Have opinions.** React to facts instead of neutrally listing pros and cons. - **Vary rhythm.** Short sentences. Then longer ones that take their time. Mix it up. - **Acknowledge complexity.** "Impressive but also kind of unsettling" beats "impressive." - **Use "I" when it fits.** First person isn't unprofessional. - **Let some mess in.** Perfect structure looks machine-made. - **Be specific.** Not "this is concerning" but "there's something unsettling about agents churning away at 3am."

## Patterns to detect and fix

### Content

1. **Puffery.** "pivotal moment", "testament to", "evolving landscape", "setting the stage for", "indelible mark", "deeply rooted". Cut puffery, state what happened. 2. **Name-dropping.** Listing media outlets without context. Pick one, say what was said. 3. **Superficial -ing phrases.** "highlighting...", "ensuring...", "reflecting...", "showcasing...", "fostering...". Delete or expand with real sources. 4. **Promotional language.** "nestled", "vibrant", "breathtaking", "groundbreaking", "renowned", "stunning", "must-visit". Use neutral descriptions. 5. **Vague attributions.** "Experts believe", "Industry reports suggest", "Some critics argue". Name the source or delete. 6. **Formulaic challenges.** "Despite challenges... continues to thrive." Replace with specific facts.

### Language

7. **AI vocabulary.** Additionally, crucial, delve, enduring, enhance, fostering, garner, interplay, intricate, landscape (abstract), pivotal, showcase, tapestry (abstract), testament, underscore, vibrant. Replace with plain words. 8. **Fancy ways to say "is".** "serves as", "stands as", "boasts", "features". Just say "is" or "has". 9. **"Not just X, but Y."** State the point directly instead. 10. **Rule of three.** Forcing ideas into groups of three. Use the natural number. 11. **Synonym cycling.** Protagonist, main character, central figure, hero all in one paragraph. Pick one, repeat it. 12. **False ranges.** "from X to Y" where X and Y aren't on a meaningful scale. List topics directly.

### Style

13. **Em dash overuse.** Avoid em dashes entirely. Use periods or commas only (no parentheses, no en dashes, no hyphen-as-dash substitutes). Em dashes are an AI tell, and reaching for parentheses instead just trades one tell for another. If a thought needs separation, end the sentence or use a comma. 14. **Colon overuse.** Colons are fine before a list or example. Not as mid-sentence connectors. "If you're coming from traditional automation: instead of registering event handlers, you describe conditions" adds nothing with the colon. Rewrite to let the point stand on its own without comparison framing. "Describing when the scheduler should fire works best as plain English." Same meaning, no crutch punctuation. 15. **Boldface overuse.** Don't bold every proper noun or acronym. 16. **Inline-header lists.** The tell is a bold label and colon that restates the line: "**Performance:** Performance improved...". Convert those to prose. A bold lead-in that ends in a period, names the item, and is followed by genuinely new detail ("**Schema in TypeScript.** Tables live in one file.") is fine, not a tell. 17. **Title case headings.** Use sentence case. 18. **Decorative emojis.** Remove from headings and bullets. 19. **Curly quotes.** Replace with straight quotes.

### Communication artifacts

20. **Chatbot phrases.** "I hope this helps!", "Let me know if...", "Of course!", "Certainly!", "Found the smoking gun!" Remove. 21. **Cutoff disclaimers.** "While specific details are limited..." Find sources or remove. 22. **Sycophantic tone.** "Great question! You're absolutely right!" Respond directly.

### Filler

23. **Filler phrases.** "In order to" becomes "To". "Due to the fact that" becomes "Because". "It is important to note that" gets deleted. 24. **Excessive hedging.** "could potentially possibly be argued that it might" becomes "may". 25. **Generic conclusions.** "The future looks bright." State specific plans or facts.

### Jargon

26. **Abstract metaphor nouns.** Substrate, wedge, vector, locus, vantage, nexus, primitive (as noun), harness (as metaphor), surface (as in "API surface"), bedrock, scaffolding (as metaphor), modality, paradigm, gold-plating, ratchet (as metaphor), evacuate (for moving code), endgame, north star, flywheel. These read as technical but usually have a plainer concrete word. "Substrate" becomes "base". "Wedge in" becomes "add". "Vector" becomes "way" or "method". "Gold-plating" becomes "more than the job needs". "Ratchet" becomes the mechanism's real name or "a limit that only tightens". "Evacuate" becomes "move out". "Endgame" becomes "the last phase". Pick the concrete word.

### Plain speech

27. **Say what it does, not how it feels.** "the database stays close at hand", "SQL you can read", "types that follow your schema" name a feeling. The fix names the mechanism or a number: "`.toSQL()` returns the exact string sent to the database", "a column rename fails the build". Ask what the sentence tells the reader to do or know, then write that. If you can't restate it as a concrete instruction, fact, or number, cut it. One more check: if the sentence could appear unchanged in another project's docs, it says nothing about this one. Cut it. 28. **Shorten or split dense sentences.** If the reader has to backtrack to parse a sentence, break it in two or drop clauses. One idea per sentence. 29. **Active voice.** Prefer it. Catch "is/are/was/were + past participle" and name the actor: "queries are validated" becomes "the compiler validates queries", "the file is parsed by the loader" becomes "the loader parses the file". Passive is fine only when the actor is unknown or genuinely doesn't matter. 30. **Cut adverbs, or use a stronger verb.** "runs quickly" becomes "is fast" or the number. "significantly improves" becomes the measured delta. An adverb propping up a weak verb means the verb is wrong. 31. **Prefer the plain word.** "utilize" becomes "use", "leverage" becomes "use", "facilitate" becomes "help", "numerous" becomes "many", "in the event that" becomes "if". The fancier synonym is rarely clearer.

技术详情

版本
1.0.0
许可证
Apache-2.0
最近更新
2026年8月19日
发布时间
2026年8月19日

决策摘要

备选候选

59
就绪
原型验证
阶段

仓库近期活跃

审计

安装审查

安装与采用审查

76
需审查
安全性
81/100
维护状态
100/100
安装
92/100
打开完整审计查看评估报告

Agent 验证证据

Agent 验证证据

来自解析、审查、安装和一次小范围运行后的结果报告。

0
已验证
Needs first agent run自动安装: 先审查最近: 未知
成功率
近期失败
结果
0
输出质量
失败
0
不相关
0
安装次数
0
风险拦截
0
需要配置
0
生产环境
0

暂时没有 Agent 结果数据。首次 Agent 执行可以通过 /api/agent/outcome 报告成功、需要设置、风险拦截、失败或不相关。

安装

加入 Agent 工作流

免费且开源. 在生产 Agent 中安装前请先审查报告。

增长闭环

分享工具包

X

为 unslop 准备的场景化草稿,可手动发布到 X。

策展说明
A practical pick for a repeatable workflow:

unslop: Cut AI tells from any writing. Must always apply.

19 stars

https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/sero-labs-unslop?ref=x
打开 X 草稿
可选:带安装命令的回复
Listing + install path for unslop:
https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/sero-labs-unslop?ref=x

Install: npx skills add sero-labs/sero --skill unslop
打开回复草稿

收录来源

Registry 收录

可认领

此列表来自公开来源,维护者认领获批前不会标记为官方。

创作者
sero-labs
收录方
OpenAgentSkill 社区索引

归属链接指向公开仓库或创作者主页。创作者可认领列表以更新所有权信号。

认领此 Skill

所有者认领

认领此 Skill 页面

这条 Registry 收录 列表归属于 sero-labs,但尚未标记为官方。认领后可增加已验证所有者信号,使后续发布、安装和审计更新更值得信赖。

创作者外链工具包

将证据徽章加入你的 README

在开发者评估仓库的位置展示规范页面、当前信任与审计信号,以及真实的 Agent 验证证据。

[![Listed on OpenAgentSkill](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/sero-labs-unslop?metric=listed&label=Listed)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/sero-labs-unslop)
[![OpenAgentSkill Trust](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/sero-labs-unslop?metric=trust&label=Trust)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/sero-labs-unslop)
[![OpenAgentSkill Audit](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/sero-labs-unslop?metric=audit&label=Audit)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/sero-labs-unslop/audit)
[![Agent Proven](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/sero-labs-unslop?metric=proven&label=Agent%20Proven)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/sero-labs-unslop)

作者

S

sero-labs

@sero-labs

平台适配

健康信号

GitHub Stars
19
质量评分
33/100
最近 GitHub 推送
2026年8月19日
框架提示
未知
OpenAgentSkill 浏览量
1
复制安装命令
0
跳转点击
0

社区信号

告诉我们这个 Skill 是否对你的 Agent 工作流有帮助。汇总反馈会持续改善排序。

信任与安全

仅限沙盒

63
  • GitHub 采用度19 个 GitHub Stars修复
  • Star/Fork 活跃度19 个 Star,1 个 Fork; 当前元数据中没有议题活跃度信息修复
  • 近期维护距上次推送 3 天通过
  • 许可证清晰度Apache-2.0通过
  • README/SKILL.md 完整度公开元数据需要更完整的 README/SKILL.md 上下文信息
  • 依赖与运行时风险network or browser surface, database surface信息