api-design

Tinjau · 59
Diindeks di Registry

Design and review predictable public APIs for TypeScript, JavaScript, React, and React Native libraries. Use when shaping exported functions, classes, hooks, options objects, event and listener APIs, error behavior, naming, cross-platform abstractions, or JS-only packages. Pair w

Verified installs0
Star161
Versi1.0.0
Kualitas63/100 · Menjanjikan
Kepercayaan59/100 · Do not auto-install
Audit74/100 · Perlu ditinjau

Profil aset

Desain dan produksi kreatif

Design assets, images, video, audio, multimodal media, presentation, and creative production skills.

Lihat kategori

Skenario

Desain dan kreatif

I need my agent to produce design assets, UI directions, presentations, or creative media workflows.

Kecocokan Agent

Claude Code + CLI + Codex

Cocok untuk Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, CLI, atau Agent khusus.

Pasang

Siap

npx skills add margelo/react-native-skills --skill api-design

Pemeliharaan

Terkini

1 hari sejak push

Risiko

Perlu ditinjau

Lisensi tidak jelas

Kualitas GitHub

161

63/100 Kualitas · 67/100 Kepercayaan

Tag cakupan

DesainDesain dan kreatifDesain dan kreatifagent-skill

Catatan ulasan

Lisensi tidak jelas · Permission surface may require sandboxing

Kartu adopsi Agent

Kepercayaan, audit, dan kesiapan pemasangan dalam sekali lihat

Skor ini menggabungkan metadata repositori publik, sinyal ulasan OpenAgentSkill, kebaruan pemeliharaan, dan kesiapan pemasangan. Ini adalah sinyal shortlist, bukan pengganti peninjauan manusia.

Kualitas

Menjanjikan
63

Useful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.

Kepercayaan

Do not auto-install
59

Trust Score v5 found insufficient evidence for agent installation. Treat this as discovery material, not an executable recommendation.

Audit

Perlu ditinjau
74

Tinjauan yang dapat dibaca mesin tentang kesiapan pemasangan, metadata keamanan, pemeliharaan, dan risiko adopsi.

Trust Score OpenAgentSkill v5

Tinjauan manusia sebelum pemasangan

Choose a stronger alternative or inspect the source manually before any install attempt.

CodexClaude CodeCursorOpenAgentSkill CLI

Star

161 star GitHub

Aktivitas repositori

161 star dan 7 fork

Pemeliharaan

1 hari sejak push

Lisensi

Tidak diketahui

Pasang

npx skills add margelo/react-native-skills --skill api-design

Keamanan pemasangan

Jalur pemasangan paket atau runtime standar

Cakupan izin

shell or command execution, filesystem or document access

Hasil Agent

Belum ada data hasil Agent

Dokumentasi

Konteks README/SKILL.md kuat

Ringkasan risiko

Tinjau sebelum produksi

  • Repository license is detected as 'Unknown', raising compliance concerns about reuse and redistribution.
  • Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision.
  • Lisensi tidak jelas
  • Quality score needs review

Kesiapan pemasangan

Jalur pemasangan tersedia

  • Jalur pemasangan tersedia
  • Bukti repositori tersedia
  • Lisensi tidak jelas
  • Belum ada bukti hasil Agent-Proven

Metadata yang dapat dibaca Agent

Data keputusan yang dapat dibaca mesin untuk skill ini.

Gunakan blok ini atau JSON tersemat untuk memutuskan apakah Agent perlu memasang skill ini, memilih alternatif, atau meminta tinjauan manusia terlebih dahulu.

Buka JSON

Tugas yang sesuai

  • alur kerja GitHub automation
  • Tim Claude Code
  • builders willing to evaluate younger projects
  • Inspect repository metadata

Agent yang sesuai

CodexClaude CodeCursorOpenAgentSkill CLICLI

Keputusan pemasangan

Perintah
npx skills add margelo/react-native-skills --skill api-design
Kebijakan
Tinjau
Tinjauan manusia
Ya

Kepercayaan dan risiko

Kepercayaan
59/100
Audit
74/100
Tingkat risiko
Perlu ditinjau

Lingkar hasil

Endpoint
/api/agent/outcome
ID event
resolve
Hasil
5

Perintah pemasangan

npx skills add margelo/react-native-skills --skill api-design

Jangan gunakan ketika

  • Tim yang membutuhkan SLA dengan dukungan vendor
  • production agents without a repository review
  • Repository license is detected as 'Unknown', raising compliance concerns about reuse and redistribution.
  • Petunjuk izin berisiko tinggi: eksekusi shell atau perintah
  • Lisensi tidak jelas

Keamanan Agent v2

42/100 · Hindari pemasangan otomatis

EksperimentalTinjau

Sparse or mixed signals. Useful for discovery, but not for autonomous installation.

Test manually in an isolated workspace and compare against safer alternatives.

Selesaikan via API

Tinggi

Eksekusi shell atau perintah

Metadata skill merujuk terminal, CLI, shell, subprocess, atau alur kerja eksekusi perintah.

Sedang

Browser automation

Skill may drive a browser or interact with web pages.

Sedang

Akses jaringan

Skill kemungkinan mengambil halaman jarak jauh, API, repositori, atau layanan eksternal.

Sedang

Akses sistem file

Skill dapat membaca atau menulis file proyek, dokumen, artefak yang dihasilkan, atau status workspace lokal.

  • Petunjuk izin berisiko tinggi: eksekusi shell atau perintah
  • Lisensi tidak jelas

Target pemasangan

Pasang skill ini di alur Agent Anda

Gunakan endpoint publik untuk mengambil perintah, checklist keamanan, prompt target, dan tautan kanonis.

skill install

OpenAgentSkill CLI

Resolve policy, run the source installer safely, and report a verified install receipt.

$ npx --yes https://github.com/Leon-Drq/openagentskill/releases/download/cli-v0.2.1/openagentskill-0.2.1.tgz install margelo-api-design

Rencana resolusi Agent

Biarkan Agent memverifikasi kecocokan sebelum memasang.

API Resolve mengembalikan skill utama, alternatif, kebijakan keamanan, catatan audit, target pemasangan, dan prompt siap pakai.

Buka rencana teks

Agent harus memeriksa

  • Task fit and alternatives from Resolve API.
  • Audit score, trust score, and safety policy warnings.
  • Install target compatibility for Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, or CLI.

Salin prompt

Task: Use api-design in this workspace.
Resolve first: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20api-design%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Review install handoff: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/margelo-api-design/install
Install command: npx skills add margelo/react-native-skills --skill api-design
Before running it, summarize audit warnings, required permissions, and the fallback skill if install is risky.

Serah-terima Agent

Berikan jalur pemasangan kepada Agent, bukan direktori lain.

Gunakan endpoint publik untuk mengambil perintah, checklist keamanan, prompt target, dan tautan kanonis.

Buka API pemasangan

Prompt Agent

Use api-design for this task. Review https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/margelo-api-design/install, then install with: npx skills add margelo/react-native-skills --skill api-design

Metadata Registry

Profil yang dapat dibaca Agent untuk pemilihan skill otomatis.

API Registry menyediakan sinyal keputusan, kepercayaan, audit, use case, dan pemasangan tanpa mengikis UI.

Buka Manifest

Kecocokan Agent

63/100

GitHub automation

Platform

Claude Code

Laporan audit

Perlu ditinjau · 74/100

Tinjauan yang dapat dibaca mesin tentang kesiapan pemasangan, metadata keamanan, pemeliharaan, dan risiko adopsi.

Lihat laporan auditLihat laporan evaluasi

Panel keputusan Agent

Fallback candidate for GitHub automation

Prototype with this skill first; keep a fallback candidate ready.

63
Kesiapan
Prototipe
Tahap

Peran di stack

Kandidat cadangan

Kecocokan utama

GitHub automation

Label kepercayaan

Buat prototipe dulu

Jalur pemasangan

Perintah siap

Gunakan saat

  • alur kerja GitHub automation
  • Tim Claude Code
  • builders willing to evaluate younger projects

Bukti

  • recent repository activity
  • install command or GitHub repo available
  • profil kualitas 63/100
  • 2 event interaksi OpenAgentSkill

tinjau dulu

  • Repository license is detected as 'Unknown', raising compliance concerns about reuse and redistribution.

Jalur implementasi

  1. 1Pasang di Agent sandbox dan jalankan satu tugas GitHub automation dari awal hingga akhir.
  2. 2Compare output quality, latency, and failure behavior against at least one alternative.
  3. 3Promote it into production only after reviewing repository permissions, license, and maintenance signals.

Profil kepercayaan

Do not auto-install

Trust Score v5 found insufficient evidence for agent installation. Treat this as discovery material, not an executable recommendation.

59
Trust Score OpenAgentSkill

Adopsi GitHub

Info

161 star GitHub

Aktivitas star/fork

Periksa

161 star dan 7 fork; aktivitas issue tidak tersedia dalam metadata saat ini

Pemeliharaan terbaru

Lulus

1 hari sejak push

Kejelasan lisensi

Periksa

Tidak diketahui

Sinyal positif

  • Tinjauan AI disetujui
  • Jalur pemasangan tersedia
  • Bukti repositori tersedia
  • Repositori yang baru dipelihara
  • Perintah pemasangan tidak memiliki pola berisiko tinggi yang jelas
  • Loop hasil siap tetapi membutuhkan eksekusi Agent nyata pertama

Tinjau sebelum memasang

  • Repository license is detected as 'Unknown', raising compliance concerns about reuse and redistribution.
  • Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision.
  • Lisensi tidak jelas
  • Quality score needs review
  • Permission surface needs review: shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
  • Stars/forks activity: 161 stars, 7 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
  • License clarity: Unknown
  • Permission surface: shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
  • Belum ada laporan hasil Agent nyata
  • Tinjauan manusia diperlukan sebelum pemasangan tanpa pengawasan

Tindakan yang disarankan

Choose a stronger alternative or inspect the source manually before any install attempt.

Profil kualitas

Menjanjikan kandidat untuk alur kerja Agent

Useful candidate, but compare it with alternatives before adopting.

63
Star GitHub
161
Keterkinian
1 hari lalu
Siap dipasang
Ya
Lisensi
Tidak diketahui
Tinjau sebelum memasang: Repository license is detected as 'Unknown', raising compliance concerns about reuse and redistribution.

Kecocokan alur kerja

Gunakan skill ini pada skenario berikut

Kecocokan alur kerja

Tambahkan ke alur kerja lengkap

Daftar alternatif

Bandingkan sebelum memasang

Similar skills that may fit this task.

Bandingkan semua

Ringkasan

--- name: api-design description: Design and review predictable public APIs for TypeScript, JavaScript, React, and React Native libraries. Use when shaping exported functions, classes, hooks, options objects, event and listener APIs, error behavior, naming, cross-platform abstractions, or JS-only packages. Pair with build-nitro-modules when the library is backed by Nitro. ---

# API Design

Use this skill before implementation or when reviewing a public API surface. Target explicit types, stable semantics, and no irrelevant internals in the public contract.

If the library is a Nitro Module, use this skill for the public TypeScript and React API shape first, then use `build-nitro-modules` for Nitro-specific spec, native-state, and binding constraints. If the library is JS-only, React-only, or React Native JS-only, stay in this skill.

## Workflow

1. Sketch the user-facing TypeScript API before implementing internals. 2. Write 2-3 realistic call-site examples, including error and cleanup paths. 3. Check the surface against the rules below. 4. Verify the exported TypeScript with the repo's typecheck/lint/docs tooling before treating the API as done. 5. Implement only after the public shape is coherent and verified.

## API Freshness

Before choosing public API shape, dependency APIs, platform capabilities, or implementation strategy, verify current official sources instead of relying on trained memory. Library, React, React Native, platform, and tooling APIs evolve quickly.

- Prefer official docs, source repositories, release notes, changelogs, package READMEs, and current package metadata. - Look for `llms.txt` or `llms-full.txt` on official docs sites when available, and use those as compact current context. - Treat remembered API details as a starting hypothesis only. If current docs or source disagree, follow the current docs/source and mention the change when relevant. - Avoid designing against stale blog posts, old snippets, or outdated trained assumptions when an official current source is available.

## API Shape Rules

- Prefer a single source of truth. Do not split related state across booleans and dependent values when one typed value can express the state. Prefer `timeoutMs?: number` over `enableTimeout: boolean` plus `timeoutMs?: number`. - Use option objects or named structs once a function has 3 or more parameters, parameters of the same primitive type, or values that are likely to grow. - Keep APIs specific instead of accepting every possible input shape. A millisecond timeout should be a `number`, not `number | string | bigint | object | null`. - Avoid giant "does everything" objects. Split by domain or lifecycle when responsibilities differ. - Before simplifying or redesigning an API, inventory the workflows the feature is supposed to support. Do not silently drop a workflow, such as a live session API, because a one-shot path is easier to implement. Split workflows into separate APIs when needed. - Prefer literal unions, discriminated unions, interfaces, and typed option groups when the valid states are known. In TypeScript libraries, prefer string literal unions over runtime `enum`s unless consumers need a runtime value. - Avoid untyped dictionaries, boolean clusters, stringly typed commands, and loosely shaped events when the valid states are known. - Do not model a binary option as an optional two-case string union such as `'enabled' | 'disabled'`. If omitted means "use the default" and provided means true/false, use an optional boolean and document the default. - Do not represent multiple object states as one interface full of optional fields. Use a discriminated union, inheritance, or separate variant interfaces so impossible field combinations are unrepresentable. - Keep related fields together on the variant where they are required. If `barcode` and `barcodeType` only make sense together, both should be nonoptional on `ScannedBarcode`, not optional on a generic `ScannedData`. - If you create variant interfaces, use them in the actual public type. Do not define `RecognizedTextDataType` and `RecognizedBarcodeDataType` but keep `recognizedDataTypes: RecognizedDataType[]` where `RecognizedDataType` still contains every variant field as optional. - Use `undefined` or optional fields for absence. Use `null` only when "explicit none" means something different from "not provided". - Prefer discriminated unions for state machines, loading states, and result variants. - Model user intent separately from resolved state when negotiation is involved. For example, an ordered array of constraint objects can express priorities, while a resolved config object reports what the platform actually selected. - For complex negotiation, prefer ranked constraints or preference objects over exposing a combinatorial support matrix. Let callers describe intent, resolve the closest working configuration internally, and expose the resolved configuration through a return value, callback, or explicit resolver method. - Expose common presets as `as const satisfies Record<string, Type>` objects. Keep the accepted type structural so users can provide their own values. - Do not expose ambient facts the caller already knows, such as a `platform` field that only repeats `Platform.OS`, unless the API can return data produced by a different platform than the current runtime. - Do not freeze today's platform support matrix into the type shape. Prefer runtime capability fields such as `availableTextTypes: []` or `supportedFormats: []` over separate platform-specific types or static exclusions. This lets newer native capabilities become available without redesigning the JS API. - Prefer one unified options object. Avoid `ios`/`android` option bags and platform-prefixed methods unless the concepts are genuinely platform-only and cannot be described as a cross-platform capability or no-op. - Classify configuration fields as either requirements or preferences. Throw when a requirement cannot be met. Treat preferences as best-effort when the feature can still perform its core job, such as quality, guidance UI, high-frame-rate tracking, auto-zoom, or a wider scan area. Document best-effort fields and expose capabilities or resolved configuration when callers need to know what was applied. - Split by stable semantic capability when capabilities have different options, results, or futures. For example, barcode scanning and text scanning may deserve separate `BarcodeScanner` and `TextScanner` APIs even when one native API happens to implement both today. A platform that lacks text scanning should fail `createTextScanner()` or report `isTextScannerAvailable: false`, not force text-specific fields to be nullable on a generic scanner used for barcode scanning. - Runtime availability should describe whether a stable capability exists today, not permanently restrict the API shape to the current platform matrix. If Android gains text scanning later, the existing `TextScanner` capability should become available without changing barcode APIs or broadening nullable result types. - Keep capability discovery separate from object contracts. Use capability fields to decide whether a workflow can be created or which optional preferences may apply. Once a factory returns a specific session/resource object, its baseline methods should be guaranteed by construction; otherwise return a narrower type or fail creation instead of making callers check `can*` before every normal method. - Splitting workflows should reduce runtime capability checks. Do not keep broad capability flags only to compensate for one oversized object. For example, a one-shot scanner and an app-owned live scanner can be separate APIs; if the live scanner implementation guarantees zoom, photo capture, or region control, those can be part of the live scanner contract instead of nullable properties plus `can*` checks inherited from a one-shot backend. - Encode lifecycle transitions in the API object graph. If commands are valid only after `configure`, `connect`, `start`, or another lifecycle transition, expose those commands on a handle returned by that transition, not on the parent object with "maybe active" checks. For example, `session.configure(device, outputs)` can return a `Controller` that owns `setZoom(...)` and `focusTo(...)`; the `Session` owns graph configuration and start/stop. - Avoid stale-state APIs. If reconfiguration changes the native resource a command targets, return a new handle and invalidate or dispose the old one. Callers should not be able to accidentally call a command on a parent object that no longer knows which configured device/output it applies to. - Use callbacks or returned resolved objects for post-negotiation facts. If an output, controller, or session config becomes meaningful only after connection, provide `onConfigured`, a returned controller/config, or an explicit `resolve...(...)` method rather than forcing callers to poll nullable properties. - For Nitro-backed imperative APIs, treat the public HybridObject as the API by default. Do not add JS wrappers that pre-parse inputs, translate enum/string shapes, normalize one public format into another, or otherwise make JS call a different API than the generated Nitro spec. Put the intended public shape directly in the Nitro spec and native implementation. - When "all" is a meaningful requested value, model it explicitly instead of using `undefined` as a hidden command. For example, prefer `targetFormats: 'all' | BarcodeFormat[]` or `TargetBarcodeFormat = BarcodeFormat | 'all'` when the implementation benefits from a concrete value. - Do not return half-initialized objects that require a separate `prepare()`, `initialize()`, or `load()` call before normal use. If setup is required, make the factory async and resolve with a ready object. Keep lifecycle methods for real repeatable transitions such as `start()`/`stop()`, not construction readiness. - For larger libraries, expose one small public root or factory that creates stateful domain objects. Keep object construction, async setup, I/O, and validation behind factory methods instead of forcing callers through static functions or half-ready instances. - Return `undefined` only for normal domain absence, and document exactly when it occurs. Do not use optional returns as an unstated error path; throw or reject when an operation fails. - Decide whether returned data is a plain value or a resource. Use plain structs/interfaces for small immutable data whose fields are cheap and semantically complete. Use classes/objects/resources when the value owns native state, needs lazy expensive access, can grow behavior, or should expose methods later. - Choose data representations by semantics first, then performance. Use `string` for decoded text payloads. Use `ArrayBuffer` or byte-oriented objects for raw binary, opaque bytes, media, or large data where zero-copy access is part of the contract.

### Variant Example

Avoid nullable clusters when an object can be in several distinct states:

```typescript interface ScannedData { position: Point text?: string barcode?: string barcodeType?: BarcodeType face?: Rect } ```

Prefer a base type plus variants with nonoptional state-specific fields:

```typescript interface ScannedData { position: Point }

interface ScannedText extends ScannedData { text: string }

interface ScannedBarcode extends ScannedData { barcode: string barcodeType: BarcodeType }

interface ScannedFace extends ScannedData { face: Rect }

type ScannedResult = ScannedText | ScannedBarcode | ScannedFace ```

## Public API Organization

- Split public surfaces into focused files or modules and re-export them from a clear package entry point. Do not create catch-all files that contain a feature's main object plus every enum, option, result, event, and helper type. - Default to one exported public type per file. Group multiple exported types in one file only when they form one tightly coupled log

Detail teknis

Versi
1.0.0
Lisensi
Unknown
Pembaruan terakhir
21 Agu 2026
Diterbitkan
21 Agu 2026

Ringkasan keputusan

Kandidat cadangan

63
Siap
Prototipe
Tahap

recent repository activity

Audit

Tinjauan pemasangan

Tinjauan pemasangan dan adopsi

74
Perlu ditinjau
Keamanan
71/100
Pemeliharaan
100/100
Pasang
92/100
Buka audit lengkapLihat laporan evaluasi

Bukti tervalidasi Agent

Bukti tervalidasi Agent

Laporan hasil setelah resolve, tinjau, pasang, dan satu eksekusi terbatas.

0
Terbukti
Needs first agent runPasang otomatis: tinjau duluTerakhir: Tidak diketahui
Tingkat sukses
Kegagalan terbaru
Hasil
0
Kualitas output
Gagal
0
Tidak relevan
0
Pemasangan
0
Diblokir risiko
0
Perlu penyiapan
0
Produksi
0

Belum ada data hasil Agent. Eksekusi pertama dapat melaporkan keberhasilan, kebutuhan setup, blok risiko, kegagalan, atau tidak relevan melalui /api/agent/outcome.

Pasang

Tambahkan ke alur Agent

Gratis dan sumber terbuka. Tinjau laporan sebelum memasang pada Agent produksi.

Siklus pertumbuhan

Kit berbagi

X

Draf berbasis skenario untuk api-design, siap untuk posting manual di X.

Catatan kurator
A practical pick for design or creative work:

api-design: Design and review predictable public APIs for TypeScript, JavaScript, React, and React Native libraries. Use when shaping e...

161 stars

https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/margelo-api-design?ref=x
Buka draf X
Balasan opsional dengan perintah pemasangan
Listing + install path for api-design:
https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/margelo-api-design?ref=x

Install: npx skills add margelo/react-native-skills --skill api-design
Buka draf balasan

Sumber listing

Diindeks Registry

Dapat diklaim

Listing ini diindeks dari sumber publik dan belum ditandai resmi hingga klaim pemelihara disetujui.

Kreator
margelo
Diindeks oleh
Indeks komunitas OpenAgentSkill

Atribusi menautkan ke repositori publik atau profil kreator. Kreator dapat mengklaim listing untuk memperbarui sinyal kepemilikan.

Klaim skill ini

Klaim pemilik

Klaim listing skill ini

Listing Diindeks Registry ini dikaitkan dengan margelo, tetapi belum ditandai resmi. Klaim untuk menambahkan sinyal pemilik terverifikasi dan membuat pembaruan peluncuran, pemasangan, serta audit berikutnya lebih tepercaya.

Kit backlink kreator

Tambahkan badge bukti ke README Anda

Tampilkan listing kanonis, sinyal kepercayaan dan audit saat ini, serta bukti Agent-Proven nyata di tempat pengembang mengevaluasi repositori.

[![Listed on OpenAgentSkill](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/margelo-api-design?metric=listed&label=Listed)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/margelo-api-design)
[![OpenAgentSkill Trust](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/margelo-api-design?metric=trust&label=Trust)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/margelo-api-design)
[![OpenAgentSkill Audit](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/margelo-api-design?metric=audit&label=Audit)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/margelo-api-design/audit)
[![Agent Proven](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/margelo-api-design?metric=proven&label=Agent%20Proven)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/margelo-api-design)

Penulis

M

margelo

@margelo

Kecocokan platform

Sinyal kesehatan

Star GitHub
161
Skor kualitas
38/100
Push GitHub terakhir
21 Agu 2026
Petunjuk framework
Tidak diketahui
Tampilan OpenAgentSkill
2
Salinan pemasangan
0
Klik keluar
0

Sinyal komunitas

Bagikan apakah skill ini bermanfaat untuk alur kerja Agent Anda. Masukan gabungan meningkatkan peringkat dari waktu ke waktu.

Kepercayaan & keamanan

Do not auto-install

59
  • Adopsi GitHub161 star GitHubInfo
  • Aktivitas star/fork161 star dan 7 fork; aktivitas issue tidak tersedia dalam metadata saat iniPeriksa
  • Pemeliharaan terbaru1 hari sejak pushLulus
  • Kejelasan lisensiTidak diketahuiPeriksa
  • Kelengkapan README/SKILL.mdMetadata memuat konteks penggunaan dan alur kerja yang cukupLulus
  • Risiko dependensi/runtimenetwork or browser surfaceLulus