Socratic
skill of 697 questions a senior engineer asks before writing code - packaged as a Claude/Codex skill and a portable prompt.
Supply asset profile
Coding and developer agents
Code review, repo analysis, testing, CI, GitHub, DevOps, and developer workflow skills.
Scenario
Coding agents
I need a coding agent that can understand a repository, edit code, and review pull requests.
Agent fit
Claude Code + OpenAI Agents + CLI
Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, CLI, or custom agents.
Install
Ready
npx skills add m4vic/socratic
Maintenance
fresh
21d since push
Risk
Safe to try
Quality score needs review
GitHub quality
76
77/100 Quality · 76/100 Trust
Coverage tags
Review notes
Quality score needs review · GitHub adoption: 76 GitHub stars
Agent adoption scorecard
Trust, audit, and install readiness at a glance
These scores combine public repository metadata, OpenAgentSkill review signals, maintenance freshness, and install readiness. They are a shortlist signal, not a replacement for human review.
Quality
StrongSolid option that is likely worth shortlisting for production workflows.
Trust
Sandbox onlyUseful candidate with missing or mixed trust signals. Keep it in an isolated workspace until the outcome loop proves task fit.
Audit
Safe to tryA machine-readable review of install readiness, security metadata, maintenance, and adoption risk.
OpenAgentSkill Trust Score v5
Human review before install
Run only in a sandbox and compare close alternatives before using it for real work.
Stars
76 GitHub stars
Repo activity
76 stars, 10 forks
Maintenance
21d since push
License
MIT
Install
npx skills add m4vic/socratic
Install safety
standard package or runtime install path
Permission surface
secrets or environment access
Agent outcomes
No agent outcome data yet
Docs
Strong README/SKILL.md context
Risk summary
Review before production
- Quality score needs review
- GitHub adoption: 76 GitHub stars
- Stars/forks activity: 76 stars, 10 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
Install readiness
Install path available
- Install path is available
- Repository evidence is available
- License is declared
- No Agent Proven outcome evidence yet
Agent-readable metadata
Machine-readable decision data for this skill.
Use this block or the embedded JSON to decide whether an agent should install this skill, choose an alternative, or ask for human review first.
Suited tasks
- Coding agents workflows
- Claude Code teams
- builders willing to evaluate younger projects
- Inspect source files
Suited agents
Install decision
- Command
- npx skills add m4vic/socratic
- Policy
- review
- Human review
- yes
Trust and risk
- Trust
- 68/100
- Audit
- 83/100
- Risk level
- Safe to try
Outcome loop
- Endpoint
- /api/agent/outcome
- Event ID
- resolve
- Outcomes
- 5
Do not use when
- teams that need a vendor-supported SLA
- high-compliance environments without internal security review
- No major risk signals from current metadata
- High-risk permission hints: Secrets or environment access
- Quality score needs review
Alternative
Code Review
168.6K Stars
npx skills add mattpocock/skills --skill code-review
Alternative
Grill With Docs
164.7K Stars
npx skills add mattpocock/skills --skill grill-with-docs
Alternative
To Spec
164.7K Stars
npx skills add mattpocock/skills --skill to-spec
Alternative
To Tickets
176.7K Stars
npx skills add mattpocock/skills --skill to-tickets
Agent safety v2
55/100 · Review before install
Sparse or mixed signals. Useful for discovery, but not for autonomous installation.
Test manually in an isolated workspace and compare against safer alternatives.
medium
Browser automation
Skill may drive a browser or interact with web pages.
medium
Network access
Skill likely fetches remote pages, APIs, repositories, or external services.
high
Secrets or environment access
Skill metadata references credentials, tokens, environment variables, or secret-bearing workflows.
- High-risk permission hints: Secrets or environment access
- Quality score needs review
Install targets
Install this skill in your agent workflow
Use the public install endpoint to fetch the command, safety checklist, target prompts, and canonical links for this skill.
OpenAgentSkill CLI
Resolve policy, run the source installer safely, and report a verified install receipt.
$ npx --yes https://github.com/Leon-Drq/openagentskill/releases/download/cli-v0.2.1/openagentskill-0.2.1.tgz install m4vic-socraticAgent resolve plan
Let an agent verify fit before installing.
The Resolve API returns the selected skill, alternatives, safety policy, audit notes, install target, and copy-paste prompt an agent can follow without scraping this page.
Open JSON
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20Socratic%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Resolve text
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20Socratic%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium&format=text
Install handoff
/api/skills/m4vic-socratic/install
Agent should check
- Task fit and alternatives from Resolve API.
- Audit score, trust score, and safety policy warnings.
- Install target compatibility for Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, or CLI.
Copy prompt
Task: Use Socratic in this workspace.
Resolve first: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20Socratic%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Review install handoff: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/m4vic-socratic/install
Install command: npx skills add m4vic/socratic
Before running it, summarize audit warnings, required permissions, and the fallback skill if install is risky.Agent handoff
Give an agent the install path, not another directory page.
Use the public install endpoint to fetch the command, safety checklist, target prompts, and canonical links for this skill.
Install handoff
/api/skills/m4vic-socratic/install
LLM text format
/api/skills/m4vic-socratic/install?format=text
Find alternatives
/api/skills/search?q=Socratic&limit=3
Agent prompt
Use Socratic for this task. Review https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/m4vic-socratic/install, then install with: npx skills add m4vic/socraticRegistry metadata
Agent-readable profile for automatic skill selection.
This page exposes the same decision, trust, audit, use-case, and install signals through the Registry API, so agents can rank this skill without scraping the UI.
Manifest
/api/registry/manifest/m4vic-socratic
LLM text
/api/registry/manifest/m4vic-socratic?format=text
Install alias
/api/registry/install/m4vic-socratic
Recommend
/api/registry/recommend?task=Use%20Socratic%20in%20an%20agent%20workflow&limit=3
Agent fit
Coding agents
Use-case tags
Platforms
Claude Code, OpenAI Agents
Audit report
Safe to try · 83/100
A machine-readable review of install readiness, security metadata, maintenance, and adoption risk.
Agent decision cockpit
Companion skill for Coding agents
Shortlist this skill and compare it with close alternatives before production adoption.
Role in stack
Companion skill
Primary fit
Coding agents
Trust label
Strong shortlist
Install path
Command ready
Use when
- Coding agents workflows
- Claude Code teams
- builders willing to evaluate younger projects
Evidence
- recent repository activity
- install command or GitHub repo available
- 77/100 quality profile
- 3 OpenAgentSkill engagement events
review first
- No major risk signals from current metadata
Implementation path
- 1Install it in a sandbox agent and run one Coding agents task end to end.
- 2Compare output quality, latency, and failure behavior against at least one alternative.
- 3Promote it into production only after reviewing repository permissions, license, and maintenance signals.
Trust profile
Sandbox only
Useful candidate with missing or mixed trust signals. Keep it in an isolated workspace until the outcome loop proves task fit.
GitHub adoption
CHECK76 GitHub stars
Stars/forks activity
CHECK76 stars, 10 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
Recent maintenance
PASS21d since push
License clarity
PASSMIT
Good signals
- AI review approved
- Install path is available
- Repository evidence is available
- Recently maintained repository
- Install command has no obvious high-risk pattern
- Outcome loop is ready but needs first real agent run
Review before install
- Quality score needs review
- GitHub adoption: 76 GitHub stars
- Stars/forks activity: 76 stars, 10 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
- No real agent outcome reports yet
- Human review required before unattended installation
Recommended action
Run only in a sandbox and compare close alternatives before using it for real work.
Quality profile
Strong candidate for agent workflows
Solid option that is likely worth shortlisting for production workflows.
Workflow fit
Use this skill in these scenarios
Build and ship code
Coding agents
I need a coding agent that can understand a repository, edit code, and review pull requests.
Operate web apps
Browser automation
I need my agent to control a browser, fill forms, and verify web app workflows.
Parse messy files
Document processing
I need my agent to read PDFs, extract tables, and turn documents into structured data.
Workflow fit
Add it to a complete workflow
Operate and verify web apps
Browser QA agent
A workflow for agents that navigate products, fill forms, take screenshots, and verify real user flows across web applications.
Inspect, patch, and verify code
Coding review agent
A workflow for software agents that inspect repositories, review pull requests, generate tests, and turn findings into shippable patches.
Design, build, test, and ship interfaces
Frontend and UI
A practical workflow for agents that turn product briefs or Figma designs into polished frontend code, review the result, test it in a browser, and prepare a safe deployment.
Alternative shortlist
Compare before you install
Similar skills that may fit this task.
Code Review
Review a branch or diff against repository standards and the originating spec in two independent analysis passes.
Grill With Docs
A relentless interview that pressure-tests a plan against the codebase, sharpens domain language, and updates CONTEXT.md and ADRs when decisions become durable.
To Spec
Turn the current conversation and codebase context into a structured implementation spec, then publish it to the configured project issue tracker.
To Tickets
Break a plan, spec, or conversation into independently actionable tracer-bullet tickets with explicit blocking relationships.
Overview
<p align="center"> <img src="assets/pix.png" alt="Socratic Logo" width="380"> </p>
<h1 align="center">Socratic</h1>
<p align="center"> Meta - questioning about questioning. Question yourself till you're left with only answers. </p>
**Socratic** is a self-interrogation skill for agentic AI packaging 697 questions a senior engineer asks before writing a single line of code into a portable Claude and Codex skill/prompt.
It helps an LLM slow down, inspect the task, ask itself the right engineering questions, and only ask the user for the few decisions that actually require human authority.
Not a form. Not a checklist. A lightweight reasoning loop.
## The stopping rule: question until the answer is solid
Socratic is not a 697-question checklist and it is not an endless reasoning loop. It asks the smallest set of relevant questions needed to reach a solid, evidence-backed answer.
The agent stops expanding its review when the outcome and scope are clear, consequential assumptions are visible, material risks have a mitigation or verification path, no contradiction changes the plan, and the riskiest assumption can be tested proportionately. If the next question would not change the design, risk, cost, authority decision, or verification plan, it is no longer material.
This is the purpose of self-interrogation: let an agent challenge its own plan from several useful directions, satisfy the meaningful uncertainty, and then build. It should never keep thinking merely to consume tokens, nor stop only because a token budget is low.
## How it actually works
**The agent interviews itself, not you.** Point it at a task, and it silently works through the relevant slice of the question bank — reading the codebase where it can, applying sensible engineering defaults where it can't, and only stopping to ask you about the handful of decisions that are genuinely yours to make (budget, vendor, legal risk, an irreversible call). You see the outcome — a short "here's what I
Technical details
- Version
- 1.0.0
- License
- MIT
- Last updated
- Aug 18, 2026
- Published
- Aug 2, 2026
Decision snapshot
Companion skill
recent repository activity
Audit
Install review
Install and adoption review
- Security
- 83/100
- Maintenance
- 100/100
- Install
- 92/100
Agent-proven evidence
Agent-proven evidence
Outcome reports after resolve, review, install, and one narrow run.
- Success rate
- —
- Recent failure
- —
- Outcomes
- 0
- Output quality
- —
- Failed
- 0
- Not relevant
- 0
- Installs
- 0
- Risk blocked
- 0
- Setup needed
- 0
- Production
- 0
No agent outcome data yet. The first agent run can report success, setup needs, risk blocks, failure, or not-relevant through /api/agent/outcome.
Install
Add to agent workflow
Free and open source. Review the report before installing into production agents.
Growth loop
Share kit
Scenario-led draft for Socratic, ready for a manual X post.
Socratic: A self-interrogation skill packaging 697 senior-engineer questions as a portable Claude/Codex... 76 stars https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/m4vic-socratic?ref=x
Optional reply with install command
Listing + install path for Socratic: https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/m4vic-socratic?ref=x Install: npx skills add m4vic/socratic
Listing source
Community indexed
This listing was indexed from public sources and is not marked official until a maintainer claim is approved.
- Creator
- m4vic
- Source
- m4vic/socratic
- Indexed by
- OpenAgentSkill community index
Attribution links to the public repository or creator profile. Creators can claim the listing to update ownership signals.
Claim this skillOwner claim
Claim this skill listing
This Community indexed listing is attributed to m4vic but is not marked official yet. Claim it to add a verified owner signal and make future launch, install, and audit updates easier to trust.
Creator backlink kit
Add the evidence badges to your README
Show the canonical listing, current trust and audit signals, and real Agent-Proven evidence where developers evaluate the repository.
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/m4vic-socratic)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/m4vic-socratic)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/m4vic-socratic/audit)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/m4vic-socratic)Author
m4vic
@m4vic
Platform fit
Health signals
- GitHub stars
- 76
- Quality score
- 48/100
- Last GitHub push
- Aug 1, 2026
- Framework hints
- Unknown
- OpenAgentSkill views
- 3
- Install copies
- 0
- Outbound clicks
- 0
Community signal
Share whether this skill looks useful for your agent workflow. Aggregated feedback improves rankings over time.
Trust & safety
Sandbox only
- GitHub adoption76 GitHub starsCHECK
- Stars/forks activity76 stars, 10 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadataCHECK
- Recent maintenance21d since pushPASS
- License clarityMITPASS
- README/SKILL.md completenessMetadata includes enough usage and workflow contextPASS
- Dependency/runtime riskcredential or environment accessINFO
Related skills
Code Review
Review a branch or diff against repository standards and the originating spec in two independent analysis passes.
168.6K StarsGrill With Docs
A relentless interview that pressure-tests a plan against the codebase, sharpens domain language, and updates CONTEXT.md and ADRs when decisions become durable.
164.7K StarsTo Spec
Turn the current conversation and codebase context into a structured implementation spec, then publish it to the configured project issue tracker.
164.7K StarsTo Tickets
Break a plan, spec, or conversation into independently actionable tracer-bullet tickets with explicit blocking relationships.
176.7K Stars