Skill 审计报告
lark-shared 审计报告.
Use for lark-cli setup/auth tasks: auth login/status/logout, user vs bot identity, business-domain permissions (--domain, including all/docs/drive), missing scopes, revoking authorization, or handling _notice JSON.
OpenAgentSkill 信任评分
OpenAgentSkill 信任评分
Trust Score 帮助 Agent 在安装前判断一个 Skill 是否足以进入候选清单。
GitHub 采用度
通过100
17K 个 GitHub Stars
Star/Fork 活跃度
通过97
17K 个 Star，1.4K 个 Fork; 当前元数据中没有议题活跃度信息
近期维护
通过88
距上次推送 1 个月
许可证清晰度
通过86
MIT
README/SKILL.md 完整度
信息76
公开元数据需要更完整的 README/SKILL.md 上下文
依赖与运行时风险
警告54
command execution surface, credential or environment access
安装可用性
通过92
npx skills add larksuite/cli --skill lark-shared
安装命令安全性
通过92
标准软件包或运行时安装路径
权限范围
失败36
secrets or environment access, shell or command execution
仓库证据
通过86
https://github.com/larksuite/cli/tree/main/skills/lark-shared
审查状态
警告47.64
缺少 AI 审查批准
Agent 验证结果
信息54
暂未有 Agent 结果数据
检查项
安装与采用审查
安装路径
92
npx skills add larksuite/cli --skill lark-shared
仓库
88
https://github.com/larksuite/cli/tree/main/skills/lark-shared
许可证
86
MIT
维护
88
距上次推送 1 个月
AI 审查
55
Review approval is missing
README/SKILL.md 完整度
84
Usable description available
依赖风险
54
command execution surface, credential or environment access
安装命令安全性
92
标准软件包或运行时安装路径
权限范围
36
secrets or environment access, shell or command execution
Star/Fork 活跃度
97
17K 个 Star，1.4K 个 Fork; 当前元数据中没有议题活跃度信息
采用度
88
17K 个 GitHub Stars
警告
- Dependency or permission surface needs review
- Permission surface may require sandboxing
- 缺少 AI 审查批准
- Quality score needs review
- Permission surface needs review: secrets or environment access, shell or command execution
- Dependency/runtime risk: command execution surface, credential or environment access
- Permission surface: secrets or environment access, shell or command execution
- Review status: AI review approval is missing
方法
本报告综合公开元数据、AI 审查输出、仓库活跃度、安装就绪度、OpenAgentSkill 事件、质量评分、信任检查和 Agent 安全门槛；它不是完整的源代码安全审计。
对比相近选项
下一步可审计的相关 Skill
copywriting
When the user wants to write, rewrite, or improve marketing copy for any page — including homepage, landing pages, pricing pages, feature pages, about pages, or product pages. Also use when the user says "write copy for," "improve this copy," "rewrite this page," "marketing copy," "headline help," "CTA copy," "value proposition," "tagline," "subheadline," "hero section copy," "above the fold," "this copy is weak," "make this more compelling," or "help me describe my product." Use this whenever someone is working on website text that needs to persuade or convert. For email copy, see emails. For popup copy, see popups. For editing existing copy, see copy-editing. For the offer underneath the copy (bonuses, guarantees, value framing), see offers.
47K Stars · 审计报告
cro
When the user wants to optimize, improve, or increase conversions on any marketing page or form — including homepage, landing pages, pricing pages, feature pages, lead capture forms, or contact forms. Also use when the user says 'CRO,' 'conversion rate optimization,' 'this page isn't converting,' 'improve conversions,' 'why isn't this page working,' 'my landing page sucks,' 'form abandonment,' 'nobody's converting,' 'low conversion rate,' or 'this page needs work.' Use this even if the user just shares a URL and asks for feedback. For signup/registration flows, see signup. For post-signup activation, see onboarding. For popups/modals, see popups.
47K Stars · 审计报告
marketing-psychology
When the user wants to apply psychological principles, mental models, or behavioral science to marketing. Also use when the user mentions 'psychology,' 'mental models,' 'cognitive bias,' 'persuasion,' 'behavioral science,' 'why people buy,' 'decision-making,' 'consumer behavior,' 'anchoring,' 'social proof,' 'scarcity,' 'loss aversion,' 'framing,' or 'nudge.' Use this whenever someone wants to understand or leverage how people think and make decisions in a marketing context. For applying psychology to specific pages, see cro; for pricing tactics, see pricing; for copy framing, see copywriting.
54K Stars · 审计报告