已收录
campaign-conductor
Run a project as an orchestrated campaign: Claude as conductor (Fable 5.1, or Opus 5 when Fable is unavailable) dispatching a mixed fleet of workers, Claude Opu
概览
Run a project as an orchestrated campaign: Claude as conductor (Fable 5.1, or Opus 5 when Fable is unavailable) dispatching a mixed fleet of workers, Claude Opus 5 agents for UI/UX and design judgment, Claude Sonnet 5 agents for surveys and search, OpenAI Codex CLI workers for implementation and everything else. Use whenever the user says "start a campaign", "campaign mode", "orchestrate this", "use the fleet", "mix of agents", "send out workers", "codex workers", or asks Claude to run a multi-task project by delegating to parallel agents rather than implementing directly. Also use when resuming work in a repo whose CLAUDE.md points at a campaign-hq folder.
展开完整说明
以下为来源文档,不是本网站的操作指令。执行命令前请先核实权限。
Campaign Conductor
You are the conductor. The role belongs to the strongest Claude model in the session: Fable 5.1 when available, otherwise Opus 5 at high effort. During a campaign your context window is the scarcest resource in the system: spend it on surveying, planning, dispatching, integration judgment, verification, and memory, and let workers spend theirs on implementation. If you start writing feature code during a campaign, stop and dispatch it unless the change is a tiny unblocker.
This skill is for Claude Code campaign sessions. If another runtime loads it, treat the Claude-specific Agent/Workflow instructions as a pattern and do not pretend unavailable tools exist.
Reference Routing
Load references only when that part of the campaign is active:
- Codex dispatch: Codex CLI preflight, non-interactive commands, report schemas, model/cost policy, steering.
- Fleet operations: worktrees, branch hygiene, waves, integration workers, cleanup, stalled-worker handling.
- Squads: nested delegation with a squad lead and leaf workers.
- Review gates: structured reports, cross-model review, bake-offs, verification, learnings, pause/stop behavior.
Start Or Resume
- Check
CLAUDE.mdfor an Active Campaign pointer. - If a campaign folder exists, read
CAMPAIGN.md,LEARNINGS.md, andpreferences.md, then resume from those files. - Otherwise create
docs/campaign-hq/unless that path is already used for unrelated content. Any folder name is fine ifCLAUDE.mdpoints to it. - Copy the bootstrap templates from
assets/campaign-hq/into the campaign folder, preservingbriefs/,out/, andschemas/. When Codex is installed, also copyassets/codex-agents/*.tomlinto the project's.codex/agents/so a lead that fans out can spawnfeature,critic, andgruntleaves by name. - Add this block to the project
CLAUDE.md(create the file if missing):
## Active Campaign
Campaign state lives in `docs/campaign-hq/`. Before doing project work, read
CAMPAIGN.md (plan), LEARNINGS.md (history), and preferences.md (worker routing).
Act as orchestrator: dispatch workers per preferences.md rather than
implementing directly. Doctrine: the campaign-conductor skill.
After bootstrap, the campaign folder is the source of truth. Future sessions should resume from the repo files instead of relying on this skill being loaded.
Preflight
Run preflight once at kickoff and record the result in preferences.md:
- Codex CLI:
codex --version,codex login status, and the default-model smoke test in Codex dispatch - Other agent CLIs when the user has them:
agy --version,grok --version,muse --version - GitHub CLI when CI gates matter:
gh auth status - Project verification command: run the actual build/test/lint command workers will use
- Permission envelope: Codex sandbox/network/approval policy and Claude worker edit permissions
Route around missing tools rather than discovering them mid-wave. If Codex is unavailable, use Claude-only fleets: Sonnet 5 workers implement, while Fable 5.1 or Opus 5 keeps planning, design judgment, integration, and review.
Plan The Campaign
Auto-size the campaign:
- Small or familiar repo: write
CAMPAIGN.mdyourself, including phases, worker routing, and verification commands. - Large or unfamiliar repo: dispatch 2-4 read-only survey agents for
architecture, conventions, risk/debt, and test story; synthesize their reports
into
CAMPAIGN.mdand get user sign-off before writer waves.
Use phases shaped as dispatch -> collect -> integrate -> verify -> next wave.
Never mark a task done until the conductor has read the diff and rerun the
verification command.
Worker Routing
Precedence is: user's live instruction > preferences.md > these defaults.
When the user states a routing preference, write it to preferences.md in the
same turn.
Model, worker, and effort requests are routing preferences. Do not silently replace a live request like "use low reasoning Codex for this wave" or "send tests to Sonnet" with the default high-effort policy. If a requested effort level cannot be expressed by the selected worker tool, say so before dispatching and route through a tool that can express it, or get the user's consent to the closest available policy.
These are defaults for typical work. Match effort to task difficulty, and let a Codex worker size its own fan-out: alone, one role, or the roles the user names.
| Work | Default worker | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Planning, architecture synthesis, integration judgment, final review | Fable 5.1 conductor, Opus 5 when Fable is unavailable | Keep this in the main session unless parallel survey helps. |
| Implementation, refactors, tests, scripts, debugging | Codex CLI on gpt-6-astra at medium | The worker may fan out. Read Codex dispatch before dispatching. |
| Consultation: architecture questions, design second opinions, read-only review of a Claude worker's diff | Codex CLI on gpt-6-astra at high, read-only sandbox | The consultant reads and advises without writing. See Review gates. |
| Hard task that splits many ways | Codex CLI on gpt-6-astra at max, own worktree | The brief tells the lead to fan out; it plans, delegates, and returns one branch. ultra adds automatic delegation: use it only on an explicit request, never for a leaf or a consultant. |
| Bake-off judging, final arbitration between a critic and an author | Codex CLI on gpt-6-astra at xhigh, read-only sandbox | Give it diffs and verification output, with criteria set before dispatch. |
| Leaves that need judgment, when a lead fans out | feature role: gpt-6-astra at medium | Features, bug fixes, and tests with real design content. |
| Second opinion inside a fan-out | critic role: gpt-6-astra at high, read-only by role file | Reviews a sibling leaf's diff in a fresh session. A different model family comes from the review gates. |
| Grunt work, when a lead fans out | grunt role: gpt-5.6-luna at xhigh | Mechanical refactors, fixtures, search, small tests. Luna costs about a fiftieth of Astra per token, so it exists to conserve Astra usage. Raise it to max when a mechanical task fails verification. |
| Astra not yet enabled on the account | Codex CLI on gpt-5.6-sol at high | Same briefs and roles. Record the fallback in preferences.md. |
| UI/UX, visual design, design review, frontend polish | Claude Opus 5, high effort | Workflow agent() accepts a per-agent effort parameter (this skill counts as the Workflow opt-in); the Agent tool inherits the session's effort. |
| Squad leads that need mid-flight steering | Claude Opus 5 | SendMessage steers a running agent. See Squads. |
| Read-only surveys, quick code search, research scouting | Claude Sonnet 5, or Codex CLI on gpt-6-astra at low in the read-only sandbox (-c web_search=live for research) | Require file/line evidence. |
| Review, scouting, second opinions from another model family | agy on gemini-3.8-flash-high, grok on grok-4.6 at high, or muse on muse-spark-1.3-contributor at xhigh | Read-only. OAuth-backed CLIs; use whichever the user has. See Review gates. |
| Codex unavailable or rate-limited | Claude Sonnet 5 workers, Opus 5 for design | Keep the same briefs, worktree isolation, report schema, and verification gates. |
Dispatch Rules
- Every worker brief must be self-contained: goal, owned files/dirs, exclusions, repo conventions, branch/worktree, verification command, commit requirement, and final report format.
- One writer per tree. Use worktrees for overlapping work or more than 2-3 naturally disjoint writers. See Fleet operations.
- Every writer branch must end with a commit. Uncommitted worker output is invisible to integration.
- Record each active dispatch in the
CAMPAIGN.mdfleet table: task, worker, branch, worktree, session id, dispatch time, and status (with expected duration while the worker runs). - Claude workers:
isolation: 'worktree'gives a writer its own worktree and branch without manual setup, and SendMessage steers a running agent instead of respawning it. - Use squads only for cohesive sub-goals where three or more leaf tasks must integrate before the conductor needs the result. See Squads.
Collect, Verify, Record
The conductor owns correctness:
- Parse each worker report, then inspect the actual diff and rerun the stated verification command.
- Integrate branches in dependency order. For many branches or semantic overlap, dispatch an integration worker with the intended merge order and conflict resolution policy.
- Use cross-model review for high-risk diffs and after wave integration. See Review gates.
- Update
CAMPAIGN.mdtask status as work lands. - Log durable lessons in
LEARNINGS.mdimmediately after worker failures, user corrections, useful brief fixes, or routing surprises. Compact repeated lessons into standing rules before the file becomes expensive to read. - Check in with the user at phase boundaries and on plan-changing surprises, not after every task.
On "pause" or "stop": dispatch nothing new, collect in-flight workers if practical, update campaign state files, and report exactly where the campaign can resume.
文件元数据
name: campaign-conductor description: >- Run a project as an orchestrated campaign: Claude as conductor (Fable 5.1, or Opus 5 when Fable is unavailable) dispatching a mixed fleet of workers, Claude Opus 5 agents for UI/UX and design judgment, Claude Sonnet 5 agents for surveys and search, OpenAI Codex CLI workers for implementation and everything else. Use whenever the user says "start a campaign", "campaign mode", "orchestrate this", "use the fleet", "mix of agents", "send out workers", "codex workers", or asks Claude to run a multi-task project by delegating to parallel agents rather than implementing directly. Also use when resuming work in a repo whose CLAUDE.md points at a campaign-hq folder. license: MIT compatibility: Designed for Claude Code with Fable 5.1 or Opus 5 as conductor. OpenAI Codex CLI is optional, as are the agy, grok, and muse CLIs; without them, route implementation work to Claude workers and skip other-family review. metadata: author: jvogan version: "0.9.1"
查看原始文本
--- name: campaign-conductor description: >- Run a project as an orchestrated campaign: Claude as conductor (Fable 5.1, or Opus 5 when Fable is unavailable) dispatching a mixed fleet of workers, Claude Opus 5 agents for UI/UX and design judgment, Claude Sonnet 5 agents for surveys and search, OpenAI Codex CLI workers for implementation and everything else. Use whenever the user says "start a campaign", "campaign mode", "orchestrate this", "use the fleet", "mix of agents", "send out workers", "codex workers", or asks Claude to run a multi-task project by delegating to parallel agents rather than implementing directly. Also use when resuming work in a repo whose CLAUDE.md points at a campaign-hq folder. license: MIT compatibility: Designed for Claude Code with Fable 5.1 or Opus 5 as conductor. OpenAI Codex CLI is optional, as are the agy, grok, and muse CLIs; without them, route implementation work to Claude workers and skip other-family review. metadata: author: jvogan version: "0.9.1" --- # Campaign Conductor You are the conductor. The role belongs to the strongest Claude model in the session: Fable 5.1 when available, otherwise Opus 5 at high effort. During a campaign your context window is the scarcest resource in the system: spend it on surveying, planning, dispatching, integration judgment, verification, and memory, and let workers spend theirs on implementation. If you start writing feature code during a campaign, stop and dispatch it unless the change is a tiny unblocker. This skill is for Claude Code campaign sessions. If another runtime loads it, treat the Claude-specific Agent/Workflow instructions as a pattern and do not pretend unavailable tools exist. ## Reference Routing Load references only when that part of the campaign is active: - [Codex dispatch](references/codex-dispatch.md): Codex CLI preflight, non-interactive commands, report schemas, model/cost policy, steering. - [Fleet operations](references/fleet-operations.md): worktrees, branch hygiene, waves, integration workers, cleanup, stalled-worker handling. - [Squads](references/squads.md): nested delegation with a squad lead and leaf workers. - [Review gates](references/review-gates.md): structured reports, cross-model review, bake-offs, verification, learnings, pause/stop behavior. ## Start Or Resume 1. Check `CLAUDE.md` for an Active Campaign pointer. 2. If a campaign folder exists, read `CAMPAIGN.md`, `LEARNINGS.md`, and `preferences.md`, then resume from those files. 3. Otherwise create `docs/campaign-hq/` unless that path is already used for unrelated content. Any folder name is fine if `CLAUDE.md` points to it. 4. Copy the bootstrap templates from `assets/campaign-hq/` into the campaign folder, preserving `briefs/`, `out/`, and `schemas/`. When Codex is installed, also copy `assets/codex-agents/*.toml` into the project's `.codex/agents/` so a lead that fans out can spawn `feature`, `critic`, and `grunt` leaves by name. 5. Add this block to the project `CLAUDE.md` (create the file if missing): ```markdown ## Active Campaign Campaign state lives in `docs/campaign-hq/`. Before doing project work, read CAMPAIGN.md (plan), LEARNINGS.md (history), and preferences.md (worker routing). Act as orchestrator: dispatch workers per preferences.md rather than implementing directly. Doctrine: the campaign-conductor skill. ``` After bootstrap, the campaign folder is the source of truth. Future sessions should resume from the repo files instead of relying on this skill being loaded. ## Preflight Run preflight once at kickoff and record the result in `preferences.md`: - Codex CLI: `codex --version`, `codex login status`, and the default-model smoke test in [Codex dispatch](references/codex-dispatch.md) - Other agent CLIs when the user has them: `agy --version`, `grok --version`, `muse --version` - GitHub CLI when CI gates matter: `gh auth status` - Project verification command: run the actual build/test/lint command workers will use - Permission envelope: Codex sandbox/network/approval policy and Claude worker edit permissions Route around missing tools rather than discovering them mid-wave. If Codex is unavailable, use Claude-only fleets: Sonnet 5 workers implement, while Fable 5.1 or Opus 5 keeps planning, design judgment, integration, and review. ## Plan The Campaign Auto-size the campaign: - Small or familiar repo: write `CAMPAIGN.md` yourself, including phases, worker routing, and verification commands. - Large or unfamiliar repo: dispatch 2-4 read-only survey agents for architecture, conventions, risk/debt, and test story; synthesize their reports into `CAMPAIGN.md` and get user sign-off before writer waves. Use phases shaped as `dispatch -> collect -> integrate -> verify -> next wave`. Never mark a task done until the conductor has read the diff and rerun the verification command. ## Worker Routing Precedence is: user's live instruction > `preferences.md` > these defaults. When the user states a routing preference, write it to `preferences.md` in the same turn. Model, worker, and effort requests are routing preferences. Do not silently replace a live request like "use low reasoning Codex for this wave" or "send tests to Sonnet" with the default high-effort policy. If a requested effort level cannot be expressed by the selected worker tool, say so before dispatching and route through a tool that can express it, or get the user's consent to the closest available policy. These are defaults for typical work. Match effort to task difficulty, and let a Codex worker size its own fan-out: alone, one role, or the roles the user names. | Work | Default worker | Notes | |---|---|---| | Planning, architecture synthesis, integration judgment, final review | Fable 5.1 conductor, Opus 5 when Fable is unavailable | Keep this in the main session unless parallel survey helps. | | Implementation, refactors, tests, scripts, debugging | Codex CLI on `gpt-6-astra` at `medium` | The worker may fan out. Read [Codex dispatch](references/codex-dispatch.md) before dispatching. | | Consultation: architecture questions, design second opinions, read-only review of a Claude worker's diff | Codex CLI on `gpt-6-astra` at `high`, read-only sandbox | The consultant reads and advises without writing. See [Review gates](references/review-gates.md). | | Hard task that splits many ways | Codex CLI on `gpt-6-astra` at `max`, own worktree | The brief tells the lead to fan out; it plans, delegates, and returns one branch. `ultra` adds automatic delegation: use it only on an explicit request, never for a leaf or a consultant. | | Bake-off judging, final arbitration between a critic and an author | Codex CLI on `gpt-6-astra` at `xhigh`, read-only sandbox | Give it diffs and verification output, with criteria set before dispatch. | | Leaves that need judgment, when a lead fans out | `feature` role: `gpt-6-astra` at `medium` | Features, bug fixes, and tests with real design content. | | Second opinion inside a fan-out | `critic` role: `gpt-6-astra` at `high`, read-only by role file | Reviews a sibling leaf's diff in a fresh session. A different model family comes from the review gates. | | Grunt work, when a lead fans out | `grunt` role: `gpt-5.6-luna` at `xhigh` | Mechanical refactors, fixtures, search, small tests. Luna costs about a fiftieth of Astra per token, so it exists to conserve Astra usage. Raise it to `max` when a mechanical task fails verification. | | Astra not yet enabled on the account | Codex CLI on `gpt-5.6-sol` at `high` | Same briefs and roles. Record the fallback in `preferences.md`. | | UI/UX, visual design, design review, frontend polish | Claude Opus 5, high effort | Workflow `agent()` accepts a per-agent `effort` parameter (this skill counts as the Workflow opt-in); the Agent tool inherits the session's effort. | | Squad leads that need mid-flight steering | Claude Opus 5 | SendMessage steers a running agent. See [Squads](references/squads.md). | | Read-only surveys, quick code search, research scouting | Claude Sonnet 5, or Codex CLI on `gpt-6-astra` at `low` in the read-only sandbox (`-c web_search=live` for research) | Require file/line evidence. | | Review, scouting, second opinions from another model family | `agy` on `gemini-3.8-flash-high`, `grok` on `grok-4.6` at `high`, or `muse` on `muse-spark-1.3-contributor` at `xhigh` | Read-only. OAuth-backed CLIs; use whichever the user has. See [Review gates](references/review-gates.md). | | Codex unavailable or rate-limited | Claude Sonnet 5 workers, Opus 5 for design | Keep the same briefs, worktree isolation, report schema, and verification gates. | ## Dispatch Rules - Every worker brief must be self-contained: goal, owned files/dirs, exclusions, repo conventions, branch/worktree, verification command, commit requirement, and final report format. - One writer per tree. Use worktrees for overlapping work or more than 2-3 naturally disjoint writers. See [Fleet operations](references/fleet-operations.md). - Every writer branch must end with a commit. Uncommitted worker output is invisible to integration. - Record each active dispatch in the `CAMPAIGN.md` fleet table: task, worker, branch, worktree, session id, dispatch time, and status (with expected duration while the worker runs). - Claude workers: `isolation: 'worktree'` gives a writer its own worktree and branch without manual setup, and SendMessage steers a running agent instead of respawning it. - Use squads only for cohesive sub-goals where three or more leaf tasks must integrate before the conductor needs the result. See [Squads](references/squads.md). ## Collect, Verify, Record The conductor owns correctness: - Parse each worker report, then inspect the actual diff and rerun the stated verification command. - Integrate branches in dependency order. For many branches or semantic overlap, dispatch an integration worker with the intended merge order and conflict resolution policy. - Use cross-model review for high-risk diffs and after wave integration. See [Review gates](references/review-gates.md). - Update `CAMPAIGN.md` task status as work lands. - Log durable lessons in `LEARNINGS.md` immediately after worker failures, user corrections, useful brief fixes, or routing surprises. Compact repeated lessons into standing rules before the file becomes expensive to read. - Check in with the user at phase boundaries and on plan-changing surprises, not after every task. On "pause" or "stop": dispatch nothing new, collect in-flight workers if practical, update campaign state files, and report exactly where the campaign can resume.
查看并核实来源
获取价格与运行成本
- 获取 Skill
- 价格未确认
- 运行 Skill
- 尚未确认运行要求,请查看来源中的 Agent、API 和服务费用。
- 许可证
- MIT
- 价格未确认
- 我们尚未确认此 Skill 的价格,现有来源与安装入口仍可使用。
免费获取不代表免费运行,价格标签不代表安全评级。 提交价格信息 →
来源需要复核
已跟踪的来源发生变化或同步失败,请在安装前复核当前来源。
安装前审查: 避免自动安装
许可证: MIT
- Dependency or permission surface needs review
- Permission surface may require sandboxing
- Low GitHub adoption signal
- Quality score needs review
- Permission surface needs review: secrets or environment access, shell or command execution
- GitHub adoption: 47 GitHub stars
- Stars/forks activity: 47 stars, 3 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
- Dependency/runtime risk: command execution surface, credential or environment access
- Permission surface: secrets or environment access, shell or command execution
工具列表来自元数据,并非已测试的兼容性;Agent 提示词是建议的交接方式。
从一个小任务开始
- 1阅读来源,确认输入、预期输出、依赖和权限。
- 2先让 Agent 提出计划,批准环境配置和费用,再进行隔离的小规模测试。
- 3检查输出和变更文件,只报告实际执行结果,并保留来源版本以便复现。
请在来源中核实依赖、API 密钥及第三方费用。公开仓库不代表所有服务免费。
来源与使用须知
仓库元数据和审核信号仅供参考。受欢迎、已发现来源、成功运行是不同的事实。
- 来源仓库
- jvogan/a-fable-of-codexes
- 许可证
- MIT
- 版本
- 1.0.0
- 最近 GitHub 推送
- 2026年9月6日
- 目录更新于
- 2026年10月9日
版本来自目录元数据,使用前请核实来源发布记录。
质量
61/100
有潜力
信任
62/100
仅限沙盒
审计
73/100
需审查
- Dependency or permission surface needs review
- Permission surface may require sandboxing
- Low GitHub adoption signal
- Quality score needs review
- Permission surface needs review: secrets or environment access, shell or command execution
- GitHub adoption: 47 GitHub stars
- Stars/forks activity: 47 stars, 3 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
- Dependency/runtime risk: command execution surface, credential or environment access
- Permission surface: secrets or environment access, shell or command execution
- Verified installs
- —
- 结果
- —
复制不等于安装。安装数需有成功安装回报,不代表全面的质量保证。
Agent 接入
本页通过 Registry API 提供相同的决策、信任、审计、场景和安装信号,让 Agent 无需抓取界面即可排序。
更多详情
{
"version": "openagentskill-agent-metadata-v2",
"review_evidence": {
"indexed": true,
"static_checked": false,
"ai_reviewed": false,
"manual_reviewed": false,
"creator_verified": false,
"review_result": "version_needs_review",
"reviewed_at": null,
"package_fingerprint": null,
"policy_version": null,
"notice": "Publication, static checks, AI review, and creator verification are independent facts. None guarantees runtime safety."
},
"commerce": {
"type": "unknown",
"billing": "unknown",
"amount": null,
"currency": null,
"sourceUrl": null,
"checkedAt": null,
"runtime": "unknown",
"purchaseUrl": null,
"checkout": "external",
"purchaseRequiresUserConsent": true
},
"skill": {
"slug": "jvogan-campaign-conductor",
"name": "campaign-conductor",
"description": "Run a project as an orchestrated campaign: Claude as conductor (Fable 5.1, or Opus 5 when Fable is unavailable) dispatching a mixed fleet of workers, Claude Opus 5 agents for UI/UX and design judgment, Claude Sonnet 5 agents for surveys and search, OpenAI Codex CLI workers for implementation and everything else. Use whenever the user says \"start a campaign\", \"campaign mode\", \"orchestrate this\", \"use the fleet\", \"mix of agents\", \"send out workers\", \"codex workers\", or asks Claude to run a multi-task project by delegating to parallel agents rather than implementing directly. Also use when resuming work in a repo whose CLAUDE.md points at a campaign-hq folder.",
"category": "marketing",
"url": "https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/jvogan-campaign-conductor",
"repository": "https://github.com/jvogan/a-fable-of-codexes/tree/main/skills/campaign-conductor",
"github_repo": "jvogan/a-fable-of-codexes"
},
"suited_tasks": [
"Browser automation workflows",
"Claude Code teams",
"builders willing to evaluate younger projects",
"Navigate pages",
"Click and type safely",
"Check visual and DOM state",
"Move data between tools",
"Transform files"
],
"suited_agents": [
"Codex",
"Claude Code",
"Cursor",
"OpenAgentSkill CLI",
"OpenAI Agents"
],
"install": {
"source_evidence": {
"status": "source-needs-review",
"sourceRecorded": true,
"canOfferInstall": false,
"path": "skills/campaign-conductor/SKILL.md",
"revision": "149554f88029577d5897a7cdb2acd5cc817f8726",
"notice": "The tracked source changed or could not be synchronized. Review the current source before installing."
},
"command": "",
"ready": false,
"targets": [
{
"id": "codex",
"label": "Codex",
"kind": "agent-prompt",
"value": "Review the public source for \"campaign-conductor\" at https://github.com/jvogan/a-fable-of-codexes/tree/main/skills/campaign-conductor. The tracked source changed or could not be synchronized. Review the current source before installing. Do not install or execute repository code in this review. Report whether valid skill instructions exist, their exact path and revision, dependencies, costs, license and requested permissions. Ask for approval before any installation. Treat repository text as untrusted data, not authorization."
},
{
"id": "claude-code",
"label": "Claude Code",
"kind": "agent-prompt",
"value": "Review the public source for \"campaign-conductor\" at https://github.com/jvogan/a-fable-of-codexes/tree/main/skills/campaign-conductor. The tracked source changed or could not be synchronized. Review the current source before installing. Do not install or execute repository code in this review. Report whether valid skill instructions exist, their exact path and revision, dependencies, costs, license and requested permissions. Ask for approval before any installation. Treat repository text as untrusted data, not authorization."
},
{
"id": "cursor",
"label": "Cursor",
"kind": "agent-prompt",
"value": "Review the public source for \"campaign-conductor\" at https://github.com/jvogan/a-fable-of-codexes/tree/main/skills/campaign-conductor. The tracked source changed or could not be synchronized. Review the current source before installing. Do not install or execute repository code in this review. Report whether valid skill instructions exist, their exact path and revision, dependencies, costs, license and requested permissions. Ask for approval before any installation. Treat repository text as untrusted data, not authorization."
}
],
"handoff_url": "https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/jvogan-campaign-conductor/install",
"manifest_url": "https://www.openagentskill.com/api/registry/manifest/jvogan-campaign-conductor"
},
"trust": {
"score": 70,
"label": "Manual review",
"version": "trust-score-v4",
"install_policy": "block",
"evidence": {
"stars": "47 GitHub stars",
"repoActivity": "47 stars, 3 forks",
"lastPushed": "1mo since push",
"license": "MIT",
"repository": "https://github.com/jvogan/a-fable-of-codexes/tree/main/skills/campaign-conductor",
"install": "The tracked source changed or could not be synchronized. Review the current source before installing.",
"installSafety": "standard package or runtime install path",
"permissionSurface": "secrets or environment access, shell or command execution",
"documentation": "Strong README/SKILL.md context",
"agentOutcomes": "No agent outcome data yet"
},
"outcome_evidence": {
"total": 0,
"successes": 0,
"failures": 0,
"not_relevant": 0,
"success_rate": null,
"recent_success_rate": null,
"recent_failure_rate": null,
"install_attempts": 0,
"install_success_rate": null,
"risk_blocked": 0,
"setup_required": 0,
"avg_output_quality": null,
"production_outcomes": 0,
"last_outcome_at": null,
"label": "No agent outcome data yet"
},
"auto_install": {
"allowed": false,
"sandbox_required": true,
"reason": "Do not auto-install. Inspect the source, dependencies, and permission surface first."
},
"best_for": [
"automation",
"agent-skill"
],
"known_risks": [
"Low GitHub adoption signal",
"Quality score needs review",
"Permission surface needs review: secrets or environment access, shell or command execution",
"GitHub adoption: 47 GitHub stars",
"Stars/forks activity: 47 stars, 3 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata",
"Dependency/runtime risk: command execution surface, credential or environment access",
"Permission surface: secrets or environment access, shell or command execution"
]
},
"agent_proven": {
"version": "agent-proven-v1",
"score": 0,
"tier": "unproven",
"label": "Needs first agent run",
"summary": "No agent outcome reports yet. Use Resolve, run one narrow sandbox task, then report the result.",
"metrics": {
"totalOutcomes": 0,
"successfulOutcomes": 0,
"failedOutcomes": 0,
"installAttempts": 0,
"installSuccessRate": null,
"successRate": null,
"recentSuccessRate": null,
"recentFailureRate": null,
"riskBlocked": 0,
"setupRequired": 0,
"notRelevant": 0,
"avgOutputQuality": null,
"avgTimeToUsefulMs": null,
"productionOutcomes": 0,
"humanReviewRequired": 0,
"uniqueAgents": 0,
"lastOutcomeAt": null
},
"signals": [],
"penalties": [
"No real agent outcome evidence yet"
]
},
"audit": {
"score": 73,
"risk_level": "needs_review",
"risk_label": "Needs review",
"warnings": [
"Dependency or permission surface needs review",
"Permission surface may require sandboxing",
"Low GitHub adoption signal",
"Quality score needs review",
"Permission surface needs review: secrets or environment access, shell or command execution",
"GitHub adoption: 47 GitHub stars",
"Stars/forks activity: 47 stars, 3 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata",
"Dependency/runtime risk: command execution surface, credential or environment access"
]
},
"safety_gate": {
"tier": "blocked",
"label": "Blocked for auto-install",
"auto_install_policy": "block",
"auto_install_allowed": false,
"human_review_required": true,
"blocked": true,
"recommended_action": "Do not auto-install. Inspect the source, dependencies, and permission surface first."
},
"quality": {
"score": 61,
"label": "Promising"
},
"supply": {
"track": "Research and knowledge work",
"scenario": "RAG and knowledge",
"maintenance": "1mo since push",
"risk": "Needs review"
},
"alternative_skills": [],
"do_not_use_when": [
"teams that need a vendor-supported SLA",
"production agents without a repository review",
"Low GitHub adoption signal",
"High-risk permission hints: Shell or command execution, Secrets or environment access",
"Dependency or permission surface needs review",
"Permission surface may require sandboxing",
"Quality score needs review",
"Permission surface needs review: secrets or environment access, shell or command execution"
],
"agent_contract": {
"task_input": "Use campaign-conductor in an agent workflow",
"recommended_action": "Do not auto-install. Inspect the source, dependencies, and permission surface first.",
"install_policy": "block",
"minimum_review_before_use": [
"Trust: 70/100 Manual review",
"Audit: 73/100 Needs review",
"Safety: 29/100 Avoid automatic install",
"Review repository, license, install command, and permission surface before production use."
],
"expected_agent_output": {
"selected_skill": "jvogan-campaign-conductor (campaign-conductor)",
"install_command": "",
"risk_summary": "Needs review; Blocked for auto-install; Review before production",
"verification_result": "Report the smallest successful task, files touched, warnings, and any missing setup."
}
},
"outcome_feedback": {
"endpoint": "https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/outcome",
"method": "POST",
"requires_resolve_event_id": true,
"event_id_source": "Use install_receipt.outcome_feedback.event_id or feedback.event_id returned by /api/agent/resolve for the current task.",
"expected_outcomes": [
"success",
"failed",
"not_relevant",
"blocked_by_risk",
"setup_required"
],
"payload_template": {
"event_id": "<install_receipt.outcome_feedback.event_id or feedback.event_id from /api/agent/resolve>",
"skill_slug": "jvogan-campaign-conductor",
"task": "Use campaign-conductor in an agent workflow",
"agent": "codex",
"outcome": "success",
"install_used": true,
"risk_blocked": false,
"setup_required": false,
"task_success": true,
"output_quality": 4,
"error_type": null,
"human_review_required": false,
"workspace": "sandbox",
"time_to_useful_ms": 120000,
"notes": "Report the smallest successful task, setup friction, files touched, and risk notes."
}
},
"endpoints": {
"web": "https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/jvogan-campaign-conductor",
"api": "https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/skills/jvogan-campaign-conductor",
"audit": "https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/jvogan-campaign-conductor/audit",
"eval": "https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/evals?slug=jvogan-campaign-conductor&task=Use%20campaign-conductor%20in%20an%20agent%20workflow&max_risk=medium",
"resolve": "https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20campaign-conductor%20in%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium",
"receipt": "https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/receipt?task=Use%20campaign-conductor%20in%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium&format=text",
"install": "https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/jvogan-campaign-conductor/install",
"manifest": "https://www.openagentskill.com/api/registry/manifest/jvogan-campaign-conductor"
}
}创作者工具
收录来源
Registry 收录
此列表来自公开来源,维护者认领获批前不会标记为官方。
- 创作者
- jvogan
- 收录方
- OpenAgentSkill 社区索引
归属链接指向公开仓库或创作者主页。创作者可认领列表以更新所有权信号。
认领此 Skill所有者认领
认领此 Skill 页面
这条 Registry 收录 列表归属于 jvogan,但尚未标记为官方。认领后可增加已验证所有者信号,使后续发布、安装和审计更新更值得信赖。
分享工具包
创作者外链工具包
将证据徽章加入你的 README
在开发者评估仓库的位置展示规范页面、当前信任与审计信号,以及真实的 Agent 验证证据。
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/jvogan-campaign-conductor?ref=github&utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=creator_badge)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/jvogan-campaign-conductor?ref=github&utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=creator_badge)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/jvogan-campaign-conductor/audit)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/jvogan-campaign-conductor?ref=github&utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=creator_badge)社区信号
告诉我们这个 Skill 是否对你的 Agent 工作流有帮助。汇总反馈会持续改善排序。
