Creator · coleam00
Last updated · Sep 3, 2026
Slice an epic (with its architecture decisions) into PIV-sized tickets with a dependency graph, then create them in your tracker (Jira via the Atlassian MCP, or GitHub/Linear/local). Accepts the epic and its architecture as one doc or as an epic plus a separate linked architectur
Sandbox only
Install targets
Codex install prompt
Install the "piv-slice-epic" agent skill from https://github.com/coleam00/skills/tree/main/.claude/skills/piv-slice-epic. Read its SKILL.md or equivalent instructions first, install only the files needed for this workspace, and summarize any required setup before using it. Skill purpose: Slice an epic (with its architecture decisions) into PIV-sized tickets with a dependency graph, then create them in your tracker (Jira via the Atlassian MCP, or GitHub/Linear/local). Accepts the epic and its architecture as one doc or as an epic plus a separate linked architecture page. Turns a large strategic doc into the discrete units of work that the PIV loop consumes. After the install attempt, report the result to https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/outcome with POST JSON {"event_id":"install_<unique-id>","skill_slug":"coleam00-piv-slice-epic","task":"Install piv-slice-epic","agent":"codex","outcome":"success","install_used":true}. Replace event_id with a unique value and outcome with success or failed. Report success only after the skill is installed and a minimal verification passes.Supply asset profile
Code review, repo analysis, testing, CI, GitHub, DevOps, and developer workflow skills.
Scenario
GitHub automation
I need my agent to triage GitHub issues, review pull requests, and summarize repository changes.
Agent fit
Claude Code + CLI + Codex
Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, CLI, or custom agents.
Install
Ready
npx skills add coleam00/skills --skill piv-slice-epic
Maintenance
fresh
12d since push
Risk
Safe to try
Quality score needs review
GitHub quality
463
73/100 Quality · 79/100 Trust
Coverage tags
Review notes
Quality score needs review
Agent adoption scorecard
These scores combine public repository metadata, OpenAgentSkill review signals, maintenance freshness, and install readiness. They are a shortlist signal, not a replacement for human review.
Quality
StrongSolid option that is likely worth shortlisting for production workflows.
Trust
Sandbox onlyUseful candidate with missing or mixed trust signals. Keep it in an isolated workspace until the outcome loop proves task fit.
Audit
Safe to tryA machine-readable review of install readiness, security metadata, maintenance, and adoption risk.
OpenAgentSkill Trust Score v5
Run only in a sandbox and compare close alternatives before using it for real work.
Stars
463 GitHub stars
Repo activity
463 stars, 139 forks
Maintenance
12d since push
License
MIT
Install
npx skills add coleam00/skills --skill piv-slice-epic
Install safety
Agent-readable metadata
Use this block or the embedded JSON to decide whether an agent should install this skill, choose an alternative, or ask for human review first.
Suited tasks
Suited agents
Install decision
Trust and risk
Outcome loop
Install command
npx skills add coleam00/skills --skill piv-slice-epicDo not use when
Alternative
168.6K Stars
npx skills add mattpocock/skills --skill code-review
Alternative
40.8K Stars
npx skills add appsmithorg/appsmith
Alternative
175.7K Stars
npx skills add mattpocock/skills --skill implement
Alternative
30.9K Stars
npx skills add vercel-labs/agent-skills --skill vercel-react-best-practices
Agent safety v2
Usable candidate, but the agent should surface permission and audit notes before installation.
Require human approval before installing into a real workspace.
medium
Skill may drive a browser or interact with web pages.
medium
Skill likely fetches remote pages, APIs, repositories, or external services.
medium
Skill may read or write project files, documents, generated artifacts, or local workspace state.
Agent resolve plan
The Resolve API returns the selected skill, alternatives, safety policy, audit notes, install target, and copy-paste prompt an agent can follow without scraping this page.
Open JSON
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20piv-slice-epic%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Resolve text
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20piv-slice-epic%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium&format=text
Install handoff
/api/skills/coleam00-piv-slice-epic/install
Agent should check
Copy prompt
Task: Use piv-slice-epic in this workspace.
Resolve first: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20piv-slice-epic%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Review install handoff: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/coleam00-piv-slice-epic/install
Install command: npx skills add coleam00/skills --skill piv-slice-epic
Before running it, summarize audit warnings, required permissions, and the fallback skill if install is risky.Agent handoff
Use the public install endpoint to fetch the command, safety checklist, target prompts, and canonical links for this skill.
Install handoff
/api/skills/coleam00-piv-slice-epic/install
LLM text format
/api/skills/coleam00-piv-slice-epic/install?format=text
Find alternatives
/api/skills/search?q=piv-slice-epic&limit=3
Agent prompt
Use piv-slice-epic for this task. Review https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/coleam00-piv-slice-epic/install, then install with: npx skills add coleam00/skills --skill piv-slice-epicRegistry metadata
This page exposes the same decision, trust, audit, use-case, and install signals through the Registry API, so agents can rank this skill without scraping the UI.
Manifest
/api/registry/manifest/coleam00-piv-slice-epic
LLM text
/api/registry/manifest/coleam00-piv-slice-epic?format=text
Install alias
/api/registry/install/coleam00-piv-slice-epic
Recommend
/api/registry/recommend?task=Use%20piv-slice-epic%20in%20an%20agent%20workflow&limit=3
Agent fit
GitHub automation
Use-case tags
Platforms
Claude Code
Audit report
A machine-readable review of install readiness, security metadata, maintenance, and adoption risk.
Agent decision cockpit
Shortlist this skill and compare it with close alternatives before production adoption.
Role in stack
Companion skill
Primary fit
GitHub automation
Trust label
Strong shortlist
Install path
Command ready
Use when
Evidence
review first
Implementation path
Trust profile
Useful candidate with missing or mixed trust signals. Keep it in an isolated workspace until the outcome loop proves task fit.
GitHub adoption
INFO463 GitHub stars
Stars/forks activity
INFO463 stars, 139 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
Recent maintenance
PASS12d since push
License clarity
PASSMIT
Good signals
Review before install
Recommended action
Run only in a sandbox and compare close alternatives before using it for real work.
Quality profile
Solid option that is likely worth shortlisting for production workflows.
Workflow fit
Manage repositories
I need my agent to triage GitHub issues, review pull requests, and summarize repository changes.
Build and ship code
I need a coding agent that can understand a repository, edit code, and review pull requests.
Operate local tools
I need my agent to operate local files and desktop apps in a repeatable workflow.
Workflow fit
Inspect, patch, and verify code
A workflow for software agents that inspect repositories, review pull requests, generate tests, and turn findings into shippable patches.
Operate and verify web apps
A workflow for agents that navigate products, fill forms, take screenshots, and verify real user flows across web applications.
Turn skills into distribution
A workflow for turning newly indexed skills into SEO briefs, social drafts, comparison pages, and reusable publishing workflows.
Alternative shortlist
Similar skills that may fit this task.
Review a branch or diff against repository standards and the originating spec in two independent analysis passes.
Platform to build admin panels, internal tools, and dashboards. Integrates with 25+ databases and any API.
Implement work from an approved spec or ticket set, run focused and full tests, invoke code review, and commit the result to the current branch.
React and Next.js performance guidance for writing, reviewing, and refactoring production UI code.
--- name: piv-slice-epic description: Slice an epic (with its architecture decisions) into PIV-sized tickets with a dependency graph, then create them in your tracker (Jira via the Atlassian MCP, or GitHub/Linear/local). Accepts the epic and its architecture as one doc or as an epic plus a separate linked architecture page. Turns a large strategic doc into the discrete units of work that the PIV loop consumes. argument-hint: "[epic + its linked architecture page (paths or Confluence/Jira URLs); a PRD for greenfield]" ---
# /piv-slice-epic — Slice an Epic into PIV-Sized Tickets
The bridge between a strategic doc and the PIV loop. The epic doc is the destination; the PIV loop is the unit of motion; **tickets are the bridge.** `/piv-slice-epic` does the slicing.
## Input
- `$ARGUMENTS` — the **epic** to slice **and its architecture decisions**. These arrive as **one doc or two**: - a single architected epic that carries its own `## Architecture` section, **or** - an **epic plus a separate, linked architecture page** (the common case when the architecture lives beside the epic — e.g. a Confluence epic page and its linked architecture page, both passed as URLs). **Read both.** - greenfield: a PRD stands in for the epic. When the inputs are tracker references (Confluence/Jira URLs or keys), fetch them from the source via the Atlassian MCP. **This is the load-bearing input:** the architecture names the seams, data model, and missing pieces the slices must respect. - **Not prime-dependent.** A primed session helps, but isn't required. If the codebase surface isn't loaded, this skill orients itself (Step 2) before slicing.
## Process
### Step 1 — Read the sources
Read the epic fully (goal, user stories, acceptance criteria, out-of-scope) **and its architecture decisions, whether they are an `## Architecture` section on the epic or a separate linked page** (the approach, stack, data model, missing pieces, spikes). If the architecture is a separate page, fetch and read it too. The slicing has to respect those calls.
### Step 2 — Orient on the code surface (if not already primed)
Slicing needs enough codebase awareness to judge what's independent vs dependent — file overlap, shared seams. If the session is already oriented, skip this. Otherwise **explore it yourself — don't depend on a prior `/prime-codebase`**: starting from the architecture's named seams, data model, and missing pieces, read the relevant files/dirs (e.g. the adapter interface, the orchestrator, the ingestion pipeline) to see what exists, what's reused, and where new code lands. Just enough to slice confidently — not a full re-derivation.
### Step 3 — Decompose into PIV-sized slices
Break the epic into tickets. **Scope these for AI, not for a human backlog** — an agent loop carries far more than a traditional ticket: a small-to-medium implementation *phase*, ~8–10 subtasks, often **500–1500 lines of change (20–50% tests)**. A small epic might even be a single ticket. A well-sized ticket:
- Is **one testable concern** — easy to **test, review, and prove** on its own. - Is one coherent unit — a vertical slice of behavior, not a horizontal layer. - Has clear acceptance criteria of its own. - Is small enough that **one focused loop can one-shot it without context rot** — not so large the agent loses the thread and returns diminish.
Split by **dependency**, by **concern**, or as a **slim end-to-end slice** (prove the whole flow thinly, then fatten it next loop) — whatever makes each ticket easiest to prove. If a slice is too big to test or review in one honest pass, split it further. The *planning detail* stays high regardless — it's the *scope* that's larger.
### Step 4 — Slice for parallelizability
Map dependencies between tickets. **Independent tickets** — ones that don't touch the same files or rely on each other's output — can run in **parallel worktrees** (see `/worktree-create`). Mark which tickets are independent and which form a dependency chain. Slicing along vertical-slice-architecture seams maximizes independence.
**Plan just-in-time:** a dependent ticket waits until its dependency is *implemented*, not just sliced — building the dependency informs the dependent's plan, so planning it early plans against a guess. Independent tickets can be planned and run in parallel; dependent ones wait their turn.
### Step 5 — Write the ticket breakdown
Write the tickets to your tracker (Jira via the Atlassian MCP, Linear, GitHub Issues, Archon's tasks) — or to a local `docs/tickets/<epic-slug>.md` if you're solo or have no tracker. Either way, **every ticket carries its own context** — that's what lets a loop pick it up later without re-reading the whole epic:
``` # Ticket Breakdown — <epic name>
## Epic summary — goal in 2-3 lines ## Tickets ### TICKET-1 — <title> - Scope / acceptance criteria — one testable concern - Per-ticket context: the doc sections, guides, and seams this ticket needs (e.g. "source-adapter guide · seam: adapter interface · AC #2 + #4 from the epic") - Files touched (estimate) · rough size (~500–1500 lines, incl. tests) - Depends on: <none / TICKET-x> ### TICKET-2 — ... ## Dependency graph <text or mermaid graph showing the order + parallel groups> ## Suggested execution order Wave 1 (parallel): TICKET-1, TICKET-3 Wave 2: TICKET-2 (after TICKET-1 is implemented) ```
## Output
A ticket breakdown in your tracker (or `docs/tickets/<epic-slug>.md`). Each ticket then enters its own PIV loop — straight to `/piv-plan-implementation` if it's well-scoped (it primes what it needs), or `/prime-codebase` first if it needs more codebase orientation. **Priming is optional**; the per-ticket context above is what makes that possible.
## Notes
- Issue management is **tool-agnostic**: Jira (via Atlassian MCP), Linear, Notion, GitHub Issues, Archon's tasks — or just a folder of markdown files if you're solo. The tracker doesn't matter; the goal is to **split the work just enough that each loop has the highest chance of one-shot success, so you can automate the loop.** - Greenfield: the same slicing applies to MVP phases instead of epic tickets.
Source provenance
Decision snapshot
recent repository activity
Audit
Install and adoption review
Agent-proven evidence
Outcome reports after resolve, review, install, and one narrow run.
No agent outcome data yet. The first agent run can report success, setup needs, risk blocks, failure, or not-relevant through /api/agent/outcome.
Install
Free and open source. Review the report before installing into production agents.
Growth loop
Scenario-led draft for piv-slice-epic, ready for a manual X post.
piv-slice-epic: Slice an epic (with its architecture decisions) into PIV-sized tickets with a dependency grap... 463 stars https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/coleam00-piv-slice-epic?ref=x
Listing + install path for piv-slice-epic: https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/coleam00-piv-slice-epic?ref=x Install: npx skills add coleam00/skills --skill piv-slice-epic
Listing source
This listing was indexed from public sources and is not marked official until a maintainer claim is approved.
Attribution links to the public repository or creator profile. Creators can claim the listing to update ownership signals.
Claim this skillOwner claim
This Registry indexed listing is attributed to coleam00 but is not marked official yet. Claim it to add a verified owner signal and make future launch, install, and audit updates easier to trust.
Creator backlink kit
Show the canonical listing, current trust and audit signals, and real Agent-Proven evidence where developers evaluate the repository.
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/coleam00-piv-slice-epic?ref=github&utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=creator_badge)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/coleam00-piv-slice-epic?ref=github&utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=creator_badge)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/coleam00-piv-slice-epic/audit)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/coleam00-piv-slice-epic?ref=github&utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=creator_badge)coleam00
@coleam00
Share whether this skill looks useful for your agent workflow. Aggregated feedback improves rankings over time.
Sandbox only
Code Review
Review a branch or diff against repository standards and the originating spec in two independent analysis passes.
168.6K StarsAppsmith
Platform to build admin panels, internal tools, and dashboards. Integrates with 25+ databases and any API.
40.8K StarsImplement
Implement work from an approved spec or ticket set, run focused and full tests, invoke code review, and commit the result to the current branch.
175.7K StarsVercel React Best Practices
React and Next.js performance guidance for writing, reviewing, and refactoring production UI code.
30.9K StarsPermission surface
filesystem or document access, network or browser access
Agent outcomes
No agent outcome data yet
Docs
Usable metadata, review docs
Risk summary
Install readiness