gh-create-issue
Use when user wants to create a GitHub issue for the current repository. Must read and follow the repository's issue template format.
供给资产档案
编程与开发 Agent
代码审查、仓库分析、测试、CI、GitHub、DevOps 与开发工作流 Skill。
场景
编程 Agent
我需要一个能理解仓库、修改代码并审查 Pull Request 的编程 Agent。
适配 Agent
Claude Code + Browser agents + CLI
适用于 Codex、Claude Code、Cursor、CLI 或自定义 Agent。
安装
就绪
npx skills add CherryHQ/cherry-studio --skill gh-create-issue
维护状态
新鲜
今天有推送
风险
需审查
Permission surface may require sandboxing
GitHub 质量
51K
93/100 质量 · 83/100 信任
覆盖标签
审查说明
Permission surface may require sandboxing · Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision
Agent 采用评分卡
一眼查看信任、审计与安装准备度
这些分数综合公开仓库元数据、OpenAgentSkill 审查信号、维护新鲜度与安装准备度。它用于候选筛选,不替代人工审查。
质量
优秀高置信候选,具有较强的采用度与健康维护信号。
信任
仅限沙盒有用但信任信号不足或混杂的候选项。在结果闭环证明任务匹配前,请保持在隔离工作区内使用。
审计
需审查对安装准备度、安全元数据、维护情况与采用风险的机器可读审查。
OpenAgentSkill 信任评分 v5
安装前需人工审查
仅在沙盒中运行,并在用于真实工作前比较接近的替代方案。
Stars
51K 个 GitHub Stars
仓库活跃度
51K 个 Star,4.8K 个 Fork
维护状态
今天有推送
许可证
AGPL-3.0
安装
npx skills add CherryHQ/cherry-studio --skill gh-create-issue
安装安全性
标准软件包或运行时安装路径
权限范围
shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
Agent 结果
暂未有 Agent 结果数据
文档
README/SKILL.md 上下文充分
风险摘要
生产前审查
- Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision.
- Permission surface needs review: shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
- Permission surface: shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
安装准备度
安装路径可用
- 安装路径可用
- 仓库证据可用
- 已声明许可证
- 暂无 Agent 验证结果证据
Agent 可读元数据
这个 Skill 的机器可读决策数据。
使用此区块或内嵌 JSON 判断 Agent 是否应安装该 Skill、选择替代方案,或先请求人工审查。
适用任务
- 编程 Agent 工作流
- Claude Code 团队
- 重视 GitHub 采用信号的团队
- Inspect source files
适用 Agent
安装决策
- 命令
- npx skills add CherryHQ/cherry-studio --skill gh-create-issue
- 策略
- 审查
- 人工审查
- 是
信任与风险
- 信任
- 75/100
- 审计
- 89/100
- 风险级别
- 需审查
结果闭环
- 端点
- /api/agent/outcome
- 事件 ID
- resolve
- 结果
- 5
不适用场景
- 需要厂商支持 SLA 的团队
- 没有内部安全审查的高合规环境
- 当前元数据中未发现重大风险信号
- 高风险权限提示:Shell 或命令执行
- Permission surface may require sandboxing
替代 Skill
Code Review
168.6K Stars
npx skills add mattpocock/skills --skill code-review
替代 Skill
Grill With Docs
164.7K Stars
npx skills add mattpocock/skills --skill grill-with-docs
替代 Skill
To Spec
164.7K Stars
npx skills add mattpocock/skills --skill to-spec
替代 Skill
To Tickets
176.7K Stars
npx skills add mattpocock/skills --skill to-tickets
Agent 安全 v2
57/100 · 安装前审查
Sparse or mixed signals. Useful for discovery, but not for autonomous installation.
Test manually in an isolated workspace and compare against safer alternatives.
高
Shell 或命令执行
Skill 元数据引用了终端、CLI、Shell、子进程或命令执行工作流。
中
Browser automation
Skill may drive a browser or interact with web pages.
中
网络访问
Skill 可能访问远程页面、API、仓库或外部服务。
中
文件系统访问
Skill 可能读取或写入项目文件、文档、生成产物或本地工作区状态。
- 高风险权限提示:Shell 或命令执行
- Permission surface may require sandboxing
安装目标
在你的 Agent 工作流中安装此 Skill
通过公开安装端点获取命令、安全清单、目标提示词和该 Skill 的规范链接。
OpenAgentSkill CLI
Resolve policy, run the source installer safely, and report a verified install receipt.
$ npx --yes https://github.com/Leon-Drq/openagentskill/releases/download/cli-v0.2.1/openagentskill-0.2.1.tgz install cherryhq-gh-create-issueAgent 解析计划
让 Agent 在安装前验证匹配度。
Resolve API 返回首选 Skill、替代方案、安全策略、审计说明、安装目标和可直接执行的提示词,无需抓取此页面。
打开 JSON
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20gh-create-issue%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Resolve 文本
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20gh-create-issue%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium&format=text
安装交接
/api/skills/cherryhq-gh-create-issue/install
Agent 应检查
- 从 Resolve API 检查任务匹配与替代方案。
- 检查审计评分、信任评分和安全策略警告。
- 检查 Codex、Claude Code、Cursor 或 CLI 的安装目标兼容性。
复制提示词
Task: Use gh-create-issue in this workspace.
Resolve first: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20gh-create-issue%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Review install handoff: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/cherryhq-gh-create-issue/install
Install command: npx skills add CherryHQ/cherry-studio --skill gh-create-issue
Before running it, summarize audit warnings, required permissions, and the fallback skill if install is risky.Agent 交接
把安装路径交给 Agent,而不是再给一个目录页。
通过公开安装端点获取命令、安全清单、目标提示词和该 Skill 的规范链接。
安装交接
/api/skills/cherryhq-gh-create-issue/install
LLM 文本格式
/api/skills/cherryhq-gh-create-issue/install?format=text
寻找替代方案
/api/skills/search?q=gh-create-issue&limit=3
Agent 提示词
Use gh-create-issue for this task. Review https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/cherryhq-gh-create-issue/install, then install with: npx skills add CherryHQ/cherry-studio --skill gh-create-issueRegistry 元数据
用于自动选择 Skill 的 Agent 可读档案。
本页通过 Registry API 提供相同的决策、信任、审计、场景和安装信号,让 Agent 无需抓取界面即可排序。
Manifest
/api/registry/manifest/cherryhq-gh-create-issue
LLM 文本
/api/registry/manifest/cherryhq-gh-create-issue?format=text
安装别名
/api/registry/install/cherryhq-gh-create-issue
推荐
/api/registry/recommend?task=Use%20gh-create-issue%20in%20an%20agent%20workflow&limit=3
适配 Agent
编程 Agent
平台
Claude Code, Browser agents
Agent 决策面板
适合 编程 Agent 的首选
将其作为优先候选,再在你的 Agent 环境中验证 README 与安装路径。
栈中角色
首选
主要匹配
编程 Agent
信任标签
可用于生产
安装路径
命令已就绪
适用场景
- 编程 Agent 工作流
- Claude Code 团队
- 重视 GitHub 采用信号的团队
证据
- 50,908 个 GitHub Stars
- 仓库近期活跃
- 已提供安装命令或 GitHub 仓库
- 93/100 质量档案
- 3 个 OpenAgentSkill 交互事件
先审查
- 当前元数据中未发现重大风险信号
实施路径
- 1在沙盒 Agent 中安装它,并端到端完成一次编程 Agent任务。
- 2Compare output quality, latency, and failure behavior against at least one alternative.
- 3Promote it into production only after reviewing repository permissions, license, and maintenance signals.
信任档案
仅限沙盒
有用但信任信号不足或混杂的候选项。在结果闭环证明任务匹配前,请保持在隔离工作区内使用。
GitHub 采用度
通过51K 个 GitHub Stars
Star/Fork 活跃度
通过51K 个 Star,4.8K 个 Fork; 当前元数据中没有议题活跃度信息
近期维护
通过今天有推送
许可证清晰度
通过AGPL-3.0
积极信号
- AI 审查已通过
- 安装路径可用
- 仓库证据可用
- 近期维护的仓库
- Large GitHub adoption signal
- 安装命令未发现明显高风险模式
- 结果闭环已就绪,但需要首次真实 Agent 运行
安装前审查
- Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision.
- Permission surface needs review: shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
- Permission surface: shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
- 暂未有真实 Agent 结果报告
- 无人值守安装前需要人工审查
建议操作
仅在沙盒中运行,并在用于真实工作前比较接近的替代方案。
质量档案
优秀 适用于 Agent 工作流的候选
高置信候选,具有较强的采用度与健康维护信号。
工作流匹配
在这些场景使用此 Skill
Build and ship code
Coding agents
I need a coding agent that can understand a repository, edit code, and review pull requests.
Manage repositories
GitHub automation
I need my agent to triage GitHub issues, review pull requests, and summarize repository changes.
Operate web apps
Browser automation
I need my agent to control a browser, fill forms, and verify web app workflows.
工作流匹配
加入完整工作流
Inspect, patch, and verify code
Coding review agent
A workflow for software agents that inspect repositories, review pull requests, generate tests, and turn findings into shippable patches.
Turn skills into distribution
Content growth agent
A workflow for turning newly indexed skills into SEO briefs, social drafts, comparison pages, and reusable publishing workflows.
Operate and verify web apps
Browser QA agent
A workflow for agents that navigate products, fill forms, take screenshots, and verify real user flows across web applications.
替代方案短名单
安装前对比
可能适合该任务的相近 Skill。
Code Review
Review a branch or diff against repository standards and the originating spec in two independent analysis passes.
Grill With Docs
A relentless interview that pressure-tests a plan against the codebase, sharpens domain language, and updates CONTEXT.md and ADRs when decisions become durable.
To Spec
Turn the current conversation and codebase context into a structured implementation spec, then publish it to the configured project issue tracker.
To Tickets
Break a plan, spec, or conversation into independently actionable tracer-bullet tickets with explicit blocking relationships.
概览
--- name: gh-create-issue description: Use when user wants to create a GitHub issue for the current repository. Must read and follow the repository's issue template format. ---
# GitHub Create Issue
Use this skill when the user requests to create an issue. Must follow the repository's issue template format.
## Workflow
### Step 1: Determine Template Type
Analyze the user's request to determine the issue type: - If the user describes a problem, error, crash, or something not working -> Bug Report - If the user requests a new feature, enhancement, or additional support -> Feature Request - If the user is asking a question or needs help with something -> Questions & Discussion - If the user describes engineering work with no user-facing behavior change (a follow-up deferred from a pull request, technical debt, refactoring, tooling or CI work) -> Engineering Task - Otherwise -> Others
Engineering Task is not a GitHub issue form and is not offered to regular users. Only select it when the request clearly describes internal engineering work.
**If unclear**, ask the user which template to use. Do not default to "Others" on your own.
#### Eligibility Check (Engineering Task only)
Engineering Task is meant for maintainers and collaborators with write access. This is a request, not an access control — nothing prevents anyone from calling `gh issue create` directly, and this skill does not try to. The check below is here so that a contributor without write access learns that early and gets pointed somewhere more useful.
Before collecting any information, read the authenticated user's permission level:
```bash repo="$(gh repo view --json nameWithOwner --jq .nameWithOwner)" user="$(gh api user --jq .login)" permission="$(gh api "repos/$repo/collaborators/$user/permission" --jq .permission 2>/dev/null)" case "$permission" in admin | write) echo "eligible" ;; *) echo "not eligible" ;; esac ```
Only `admin` and `write` are eligible (`maintain` reports as `write`). Always compare the returned value: on a public repository this endpoint answers `read` for any user, including one who is not a collaborator at all, so a successful call proves nothing on its own. Do not use `repos/{owner}/{repo}/collaborators/{user}` here — it answers `204` for `read`- and `triage`-only collaborators, who are not the intended audience for this template.
If the result is anything else, do not use this template. Explain that it is meant for maintainers with write access, politely ask the contributor to use one of the public templates instead, and offer to help them file it there — their report is welcome, just not under this template. Do not quietly switch templates while keeping the Engineering Task labels or issue type.
### Step 2: Read the Selected Template
1. Read the corresponding template file from `.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/` directory. 2. Identify required fields (`validations.required: true`), title prefix (`title`), labels (`labels`, if present), and issue type (`type`, if present).
For Engineering Task, read [references/engineering-task.md](references/engineering-task.md) instead — it lives outside `.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/` on purpose and carries its own title prefix, labels, issue type, and body structure.
### Step 3: Collect Information
Based on the selected template, ask the user for required information only. Follow the template's required fields and option constraints (for example, Platform and Priority choices).
### Step 4: Build and Preview Issue Content
Create a temp file and write the issue content: - Use `issue_body_file="$(mktemp /tmp/gh-issue-body-XXXXXX).md"` - Use the exact title prefix from the selected template. - Fill content following the template body structure and section order. - Apply labels exactly as defined by the template. - Keep all labels when there are multiple labels. - If template has no labels, do not add custom labels. - Apply the issue type exactly as defined by the template's `type` field.
Preview the temp file content. **Show the file path** (e.g., `/tmp/gh-issue-body-XXXXXX.md`) and ask for confirmation before creating. **Skip this step if the user explicitly indicates no preview/confirmation is needed** (for example, automation workflows).
### Step 5: Create Issue
Use `gh issue create` command to create the issue.
Use a unique temp file for the body:
```bash issue_body_file="$(mktemp /tmp/gh-issue-body-XXXXXX).md" cat > "$issue_body_file" <<'EOF' ...issue body built from selected template... EOF ```
Create the issue using values from the selected template:
```bash gh issue create --title "<title_with_template_prefix>" --body-file "$issue_body_file" ```
If the selected template includes labels, append one `--label` per label:
```bash gh issue create --title "<title_with_template_prefix>" --body-file "$issue_body_file" --label "<label_1_from_template>" --label "<label_2_from_template>" ```
If the selected template has no labels, do not pass `--label`.
If the selected template declares a `type`, pass it as well. `--body-file` does not carry the issue type over on its own, so omitting this leaves the issue untyped:
```bash gh issue create --title "<title_with_template_prefix>" --body-file "$issue_body_file" --type "<type_from_template>" ```
`--template` and `--web` resolve against `.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/` on the default branch, so neither works for Engineering Task. Build the body locally for it.
For the other templates you may use `--template` as a starting point (use the exact template name from the repository):
```bash gh issue create --template "<template_name>" ```
Use the `--web` flag to open the creation page in browser when complex formatting is needed:
```bash gh issue create --web ```
Clean up the temp file after creation:
```bash rm -f "$issue_body_file" ```
## Notes
- Must read template files under `.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/` (or `references/` for Engineering Task) to ensure following the correct format. - Treat template files as the only source of truth. Do not hardcode title prefixes, labels, or issue types in this skill. - Title must be clear and concise, avoid vague terms like "a suggestion" or "stuck". - Provide as much detail as possible to help developers understand and resolve the issue. - If user doesn't specify a template type, ask them to choose one first.
技术详情
- 版本
- 1.0.0
- 许可证
- AGPL-3.0
- 最近更新
- 2026年8月22日
- 发布时间
- 2026年8月20日
决策摘要
首选
50,908 个 GitHub Stars
Agent 验证证据
Agent 验证证据
来自解析、审查、安装和一次小范围运行后的结果报告。
- 成功率
- —
- 近期失败
- —
- 结果
- 0
- 输出质量
- —
- 失败
- 0
- 不相关
- 0
- 安装次数
- 0
- 风险拦截
- 0
- 需要配置
- 0
- 生产环境
- 0
暂时没有 Agent 结果数据。首次 Agent 执行可以通过 /api/agent/outcome 报告成功、需要设置、风险拦截、失败或不相关。
增长闭环
分享工具包
为 gh-create-issue 准备的场景化草稿,可手动发布到 X。
A practical pick for the next repo task: gh-create-issue: Use when user wants to create a GitHub issue for the current repository. Must read and follow the repository's issue templa... 50.9K stars https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/cherryhq-gh-create-issue?ref=x
可选:带安装命令的回复
Listing + install path for gh-create-issue: https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/cherryhq-gh-create-issue?ref=x Install: npx skills add CherryHQ/cherry-studio --skill gh-create-issue
收录来源
Registry 收录
此列表来自公开来源,维护者认领获批前不会标记为官方。
- 创作者
- CherryHQ
- 收录方
- OpenAgentSkill 社区索引
归属链接指向公开仓库或创作者主页。创作者可认领列表以更新所有权信号。
认领此 Skill所有者认领
认领此 Skill 页面
这条 Registry 收录 列表归属于 CherryHQ,但尚未标记为官方。认领后可增加已验证所有者信号,使后续发布、安装和审计更新更值得信赖。
创作者外链工具包
将证据徽章加入你的 README
在开发者评估仓库的位置展示规范页面、当前信任与审计信号,以及真实的 Agent 验证证据。
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/cherryhq-gh-create-issue)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/cherryhq-gh-create-issue)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/cherryhq-gh-create-issue/audit)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/cherryhq-gh-create-issue)作者
CherryHQ
@cherryhq
健康信号
- GitHub Stars
- 50.9K
- 质量评分
- 56/100
- 最近 GitHub 推送
- 2026年8月22日
- 框架提示
- 未知
- OpenAgentSkill 浏览量
- 3
- 复制安装命令
- 0
- 跳转点击
- 0
社区信号
告诉我们这个 Skill 是否对你的 Agent 工作流有帮助。汇总反馈会持续改善排序。
信任与安全
仅限沙盒
- GitHub 采用度51K 个 GitHub Stars通过
- Star/Fork 活跃度51K 个 Star,4.8K 个 Fork; 当前元数据中没有议题活跃度信息通过
- 近期维护今天有推送通过
- 许可证清晰度AGPL-3.0通过
- README/SKILL.md 完整度元数据包含足够的用法与工作流上下文通过
- 依赖与运行时风险command execution surface, network or browser surface信息
相关 Skill
Code Review
Review a branch or diff against repository standards and the originating spec in two independent analysis passes.
168.6K StarsGrill With Docs
A relentless interview that pressure-tests a plan against the codebase, sharpens domain language, and updates CONTEXT.md and ADRs when decisions become durable.
164.7K StarsTo Spec
Turn the current conversation and codebase context into a structured implementation spec, then publish it to the configured project issue tracker.
164.7K StarsTo Tickets
Break a plan, spec, or conversation into independently actionable tracer-bullet tickets with explicit blocking relationships.
176.7K Stars