gh-create-issue
Use when user wants to create a GitHub issue for the current repository. Must read and follow the repository's issue template format.
Profil aset
Agent pemrograman dan pengembangan
Code review, repo analysis, testing, CI, GitHub, DevOps, and developer workflow skills.
Skenario
Agent pemrograman
I need a coding agent that can understand a repository, edit code, and review pull requests.
Kecocokan Agent
Claude Code + Browser agents + CLI
Cocok untuk Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, CLI, atau Agent khusus.
Pasang
Siap
npx skills add CherryHQ/cherry-studio --skill gh-create-issue
Pemeliharaan
Terkini
Diperbarui hari ini
Risiko
Perlu ditinjau
Permission surface may require sandboxing
Kualitas GitHub
51K
93/100 Kualitas · 83/100 Kepercayaan
Tag cakupan
Catatan ulasan
Permission surface may require sandboxing · Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision
Kartu adopsi Agent
Kepercayaan, audit, dan kesiapan pemasangan dalam sekali lihat
Skor ini menggabungkan metadata repositori publik, sinyal ulasan OpenAgentSkill, kebaruan pemeliharaan, dan kesiapan pemasangan. Ini adalah sinyal shortlist, bukan pengganti peninjauan manusia.
Kualitas
Sangat baikHigh-confidence pick with strong adoption and healthy maintenance signals.
Kepercayaan
Hanya sandboxKandidat berguna dengan sinyal kepercayaan yang kurang atau bercampur. Gunakan di ruang kerja terisolasi hingga loop hasil membuktikan kecocokan tugas.
Audit
Perlu ditinjauTinjauan yang dapat dibaca mesin tentang kesiapan pemasangan, metadata keamanan, pemeliharaan, dan risiko adopsi.
Trust Score OpenAgentSkill v5
Tinjauan manusia sebelum pemasangan
Jalankan hanya dalam sandbox dan bandingkan alternatif terdekat sebelum digunakan untuk kerja nyata.
Star
51K star GitHub
Aktivitas repositori
51K star dan 4.8K fork
Pemeliharaan
Diperbarui hari ini
Lisensi
AGPL-3.0
Pasang
npx skills add CherryHQ/cherry-studio --skill gh-create-issue
Keamanan pemasangan
Jalur pemasangan paket atau runtime standar
Cakupan izin
shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
Hasil Agent
Belum ada data hasil Agent
Dokumentasi
Konteks README/SKILL.md kuat
Ringkasan risiko
Tinjau sebelum produksi
- Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision.
- Permission surface needs review: shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
- Permission surface: shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
Kesiapan pemasangan
Jalur pemasangan tersedia
- Jalur pemasangan tersedia
- Bukti repositori tersedia
- Lisensi dinyatakan
- Belum ada bukti hasil Agent-Proven
Metadata yang dapat dibaca Agent
Data keputusan yang dapat dibaca mesin untuk skill ini.
Gunakan blok ini atau JSON tersemat untuk memutuskan apakah Agent perlu memasang skill ini, memilih alternatif, atau meminta tinjauan manusia terlebih dahulu.
Tugas yang sesuai
- alur kerja Agent pemrograman
- Tim Claude Code
- Tim yang menghargai sinyal adopsi GitHub
- Inspect source files
Agent yang sesuai
Keputusan pemasangan
- Perintah
- npx skills add CherryHQ/cherry-studio --skill gh-create-issue
- Kebijakan
- Tinjau
- Tinjauan manusia
- Ya
Kepercayaan dan risiko
- Kepercayaan
- 75/100
- Audit
- 89/100
- Tingkat risiko
- Perlu ditinjau
Lingkar hasil
- Endpoint
- /api/agent/outcome
- ID event
- resolve
- Hasil
- 5
Perintah pemasangan
npx skills add CherryHQ/cherry-studio --skill gh-create-issueJangan gunakan ketika
- Tim yang membutuhkan SLA dengan dukungan vendor
- Lingkungan berkompliansi tinggi tanpa tinjauan keamanan internal
- No major risk signals from current metadata
- Petunjuk izin berisiko tinggi: eksekusi shell atau perintah
- Permission surface may require sandboxing
Skill alternatif
Code Review
168.6K Star
npx skills add mattpocock/skills --skill code-review
Skill alternatif
Grill With Docs
164.7K Star
npx skills add mattpocock/skills --skill grill-with-docs
Skill alternatif
To Spec
164.7K Star
npx skills add mattpocock/skills --skill to-spec
Skill alternatif
To Tickets
176.7K Star
npx skills add mattpocock/skills --skill to-tickets
Keamanan Agent v2
57/100 · Tinjau sebelum memasang
Sparse or mixed signals. Useful for discovery, but not for autonomous installation.
Test manually in an isolated workspace and compare against safer alternatives.
Tinggi
Eksekusi shell atau perintah
Metadata skill merujuk terminal, CLI, shell, subprocess, atau alur kerja eksekusi perintah.
Sedang
Browser automation
Skill may drive a browser or interact with web pages.
Sedang
Akses jaringan
Skill kemungkinan mengambil halaman jarak jauh, API, repositori, atau layanan eksternal.
Sedang
Akses sistem file
Skill dapat membaca atau menulis file proyek, dokumen, artefak yang dihasilkan, atau status workspace lokal.
- Petunjuk izin berisiko tinggi: eksekusi shell atau perintah
- Permission surface may require sandboxing
Target pemasangan
Pasang skill ini di alur Agent Anda
Gunakan endpoint publik untuk mengambil perintah, checklist keamanan, prompt target, dan tautan kanonis.
OpenAgentSkill CLI
Resolve policy, run the source installer safely, and report a verified install receipt.
$ npx --yes https://github.com/Leon-Drq/openagentskill/releases/download/cli-v0.2.1/openagentskill-0.2.1.tgz install cherryhq-gh-create-issueRencana resolusi Agent
Biarkan Agent memverifikasi kecocokan sebelum memasang.
API Resolve mengembalikan skill utama, alternatif, kebijakan keamanan, catatan audit, target pemasangan, dan prompt siap pakai.
Buka JSON
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20gh-create-issue%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Teks Resolve
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20gh-create-issue%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium&format=text
Serah-terima pemasangan
/api/skills/cherryhq-gh-create-issue/install
Agent harus memeriksa
- Task fit and alternatives from Resolve API.
- Audit score, trust score, and safety policy warnings.
- Install target compatibility for Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, or CLI.
Salin prompt
Task: Use gh-create-issue in this workspace.
Resolve first: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20gh-create-issue%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Review install handoff: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/cherryhq-gh-create-issue/install
Install command: npx skills add CherryHQ/cherry-studio --skill gh-create-issue
Before running it, summarize audit warnings, required permissions, and the fallback skill if install is risky.Serah-terima Agent
Berikan jalur pemasangan kepada Agent, bukan direktori lain.
Gunakan endpoint publik untuk mengambil perintah, checklist keamanan, prompt target, dan tautan kanonis.
Serah-terima pemasangan
/api/skills/cherryhq-gh-create-issue/install
Format teks LLM
/api/skills/cherryhq-gh-create-issue/install?format=text
Cari alternatif
/api/skills/search?q=gh-create-issue&limit=3
Prompt Agent
Use gh-create-issue for this task. Review https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/cherryhq-gh-create-issue/install, then install with: npx skills add CherryHQ/cherry-studio --skill gh-create-issueMetadata Registry
Profil yang dapat dibaca Agent untuk pemilihan skill otomatis.
API Registry menyediakan sinyal keputusan, kepercayaan, audit, use case, dan pemasangan tanpa mengikis UI.
Manifest
/api/registry/manifest/cherryhq-gh-create-issue
Teks LLM
/api/registry/manifest/cherryhq-gh-create-issue?format=text
Alias pemasangan
/api/registry/install/cherryhq-gh-create-issue
Rekomendasikan
/api/registry/recommend?task=Use%20gh-create-issue%20in%20an%20agent%20workflow&limit=3
Kecocokan Agent
Agent pemrograman
Platform
Claude Code, Browser agents
Laporan audit
Perlu ditinjau · 89/100
Tinjauan yang dapat dibaca mesin tentang kesiapan pemasangan, metadata keamanan, pemeliharaan, dan risiko adopsi.
Panel keputusan Agent
Pilihan utama untuk Agent pemrograman
Use this as a leading candidate, then validate the README and install path in your own agent stack.
Peran di stack
Pilihan utama
Kecocokan utama
Agent pemrograman
Label kepercayaan
Siap produksi
Jalur pemasangan
Perintah siap
Gunakan saat
- alur kerja Agent pemrograman
- Tim Claude Code
- Tim yang menghargai sinyal adopsi GitHub
Bukti
- 50,908 star GitHub
- recent repository activity
- install command or GitHub repo available
- profil kualitas 93/100
- 3 event interaksi OpenAgentSkill
tinjau dulu
- No major risk signals from current metadata
Jalur implementasi
- 1Pasang di Agent sandbox dan jalankan satu tugas Agent pemrograman dari awal hingga akhir.
- 2Compare output quality, latency, and failure behavior against at least one alternative.
- 3Promote it into production only after reviewing repository permissions, license, and maintenance signals.
Profil kepercayaan
Hanya sandbox
Kandidat berguna dengan sinyal kepercayaan yang kurang atau bercampur. Gunakan di ruang kerja terisolasi hingga loop hasil membuktikan kecocokan tugas.
Adopsi GitHub
Lulus51K star GitHub
Aktivitas star/fork
Lulus51K star dan 4.8K fork; aktivitas issue tidak tersedia dalam metadata saat ini
Pemeliharaan terbaru
LulusDiperbarui hari ini
Kejelasan lisensi
LulusAGPL-3.0
Sinyal positif
- Tinjauan AI disetujui
- Jalur pemasangan tersedia
- Bukti repositori tersedia
- Repositori yang baru dipelihara
- Large GitHub adoption signal
- Perintah pemasangan tidak memiliki pola berisiko tinggi yang jelas
- Loop hasil siap tetapi membutuhkan eksekusi Agent nyata pertama
Tinjau sebelum memasang
- Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision.
- Permission surface needs review: shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
- Permission surface: shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
- Belum ada laporan hasil Agent nyata
- Tinjauan manusia diperlukan sebelum pemasangan tanpa pengawasan
Tindakan yang disarankan
Jalankan hanya dalam sandbox dan bandingkan alternatif terdekat sebelum digunakan untuk kerja nyata.
Profil kualitas
Sangat baik kandidat untuk alur kerja Agent
High-confidence pick with strong adoption and healthy maintenance signals.
Kecocokan alur kerja
Gunakan skill ini pada skenario berikut
Build and ship code
Coding agents
I need a coding agent that can understand a repository, edit code, and review pull requests.
Manage repositories
GitHub automation
I need my agent to triage GitHub issues, review pull requests, and summarize repository changes.
Operate web apps
Browser automation
I need my agent to control a browser, fill forms, and verify web app workflows.
Kecocokan alur kerja
Tambahkan ke alur kerja lengkap
Inspect, patch, and verify code
Coding review agent
A workflow for software agents that inspect repositories, review pull requests, generate tests, and turn findings into shippable patches.
Turn skills into distribution
Content growth agent
A workflow for turning newly indexed skills into SEO briefs, social drafts, comparison pages, and reusable publishing workflows.
Operate and verify web apps
Browser QA agent
A workflow for agents that navigate products, fill forms, take screenshots, and verify real user flows across web applications.
Daftar alternatif
Bandingkan sebelum memasang
Similar skills that may fit this task.
Code Review
Review a branch or diff against repository standards and the originating spec in two independent analysis passes.
Grill With Docs
A relentless interview that pressure-tests a plan against the codebase, sharpens domain language, and updates CONTEXT.md and ADRs when decisions become durable.
To Spec
Turn the current conversation and codebase context into a structured implementation spec, then publish it to the configured project issue tracker.
To Tickets
Break a plan, spec, or conversation into independently actionable tracer-bullet tickets with explicit blocking relationships.
Ringkasan
--- name: gh-create-issue description: Use when user wants to create a GitHub issue for the current repository. Must read and follow the repository's issue template format. ---
# GitHub Create Issue
Use this skill when the user requests to create an issue. Must follow the repository's issue template format.
## Workflow
### Step 1: Determine Template Type
Analyze the user's request to determine the issue type: - If the user describes a problem, error, crash, or something not working -> Bug Report - If the user requests a new feature, enhancement, or additional support -> Feature Request - If the user is asking a question or needs help with something -> Questions & Discussion - If the user describes engineering work with no user-facing behavior change (a follow-up deferred from a pull request, technical debt, refactoring, tooling or CI work) -> Engineering Task - Otherwise -> Others
Engineering Task is not a GitHub issue form and is not offered to regular users. Only select it when the request clearly describes internal engineering work.
**If unclear**, ask the user which template to use. Do not default to "Others" on your own.
#### Eligibility Check (Engineering Task only)
Engineering Task is meant for maintainers and collaborators with write access. This is a request, not an access control — nothing prevents anyone from calling `gh issue create` directly, and this skill does not try to. The check below is here so that a contributor without write access learns that early and gets pointed somewhere more useful.
Before collecting any information, read the authenticated user's permission level:
```bash repo="$(gh repo view --json nameWithOwner --jq .nameWithOwner)" user="$(gh api user --jq .login)" permission="$(gh api "repos/$repo/collaborators/$user/permission" --jq .permission 2>/dev/null)" case "$permission" in admin | write) echo "eligible" ;; *) echo "not eligible" ;; esac ```
Only `admin` and `write` are eligible (`maintain` reports as `write`). Always compare the returned value: on a public repository this endpoint answers `read` for any user, including one who is not a collaborator at all, so a successful call proves nothing on its own. Do not use `repos/{owner}/{repo}/collaborators/{user}` here — it answers `204` for `read`- and `triage`-only collaborators, who are not the intended audience for this template.
If the result is anything else, do not use this template. Explain that it is meant for maintainers with write access, politely ask the contributor to use one of the public templates instead, and offer to help them file it there — their report is welcome, just not under this template. Do not quietly switch templates while keeping the Engineering Task labels or issue type.
### Step 2: Read the Selected Template
1. Read the corresponding template file from `.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/` directory. 2. Identify required fields (`validations.required: true`), title prefix (`title`), labels (`labels`, if present), and issue type (`type`, if present).
For Engineering Task, read [references/engineering-task.md](references/engineering-task.md) instead — it lives outside `.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/` on purpose and carries its own title prefix, labels, issue type, and body structure.
### Step 3: Collect Information
Based on the selected template, ask the user for required information only. Follow the template's required fields and option constraints (for example, Platform and Priority choices).
### Step 4: Build and Preview Issue Content
Create a temp file and write the issue content: - Use `issue_body_file="$(mktemp /tmp/gh-issue-body-XXXXXX).md"` - Use the exact title prefix from the selected template. - Fill content following the template body structure and section order. - Apply labels exactly as defined by the template. - Keep all labels when there are multiple labels. - If template has no labels, do not add custom labels. - Apply the issue type exactly as defined by the template's `type` field.
Preview the temp file content. **Show the file path** (e.g., `/tmp/gh-issue-body-XXXXXX.md`) and ask for confirmation before creating. **Skip this step if the user explicitly indicates no preview/confirmation is needed** (for example, automation workflows).
### Step 5: Create Issue
Use `gh issue create` command to create the issue.
Use a unique temp file for the body:
```bash issue_body_file="$(mktemp /tmp/gh-issue-body-XXXXXX).md" cat > "$issue_body_file" <<'EOF' ...issue body built from selected template... EOF ```
Create the issue using values from the selected template:
```bash gh issue create --title "<title_with_template_prefix>" --body-file "$issue_body_file" ```
If the selected template includes labels, append one `--label` per label:
```bash gh issue create --title "<title_with_template_prefix>" --body-file "$issue_body_file" --label "<label_1_from_template>" --label "<label_2_from_template>" ```
If the selected template has no labels, do not pass `--label`.
If the selected template declares a `type`, pass it as well. `--body-file` does not carry the issue type over on its own, so omitting this leaves the issue untyped:
```bash gh issue create --title "<title_with_template_prefix>" --body-file "$issue_body_file" --type "<type_from_template>" ```
`--template` and `--web` resolve against `.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/` on the default branch, so neither works for Engineering Task. Build the body locally for it.
For the other templates you may use `--template` as a starting point (use the exact template name from the repository):
```bash gh issue create --template "<template_name>" ```
Use the `--web` flag to open the creation page in browser when complex formatting is needed:
```bash gh issue create --web ```
Clean up the temp file after creation:
```bash rm -f "$issue_body_file" ```
## Notes
- Must read template files under `.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/` (or `references/` for Engineering Task) to ensure following the correct format. - Treat template files as the only source of truth. Do not hardcode title prefixes, labels, or issue types in this skill. - Title must be clear and concise, avoid vague terms like "a suggestion" or "stuck". - Provide as much detail as possible to help developers understand and resolve the issue. - If user doesn't specify a template type, ask them to choose one first.
Detail teknis
- Versi
- 1.0.0
- Lisensi
- AGPL-3.0
- Pembaruan terakhir
- 22 Agu 2026
- Diterbitkan
- 20 Agu 2026
Ringkasan keputusan
Pilihan utama
50,908 star GitHub
Audit
Tinjauan pemasangan
Tinjauan pemasangan dan adopsi
- Keamanan
- 81/100
- Pemeliharaan
- 100/100
- Pasang
- 92/100
Bukti tervalidasi Agent
Bukti tervalidasi Agent
Laporan hasil setelah resolve, tinjau, pasang, dan satu eksekusi terbatas.
- Tingkat sukses
- —
- Kegagalan terbaru
- —
- Hasil
- 0
- Kualitas output
- —
- Gagal
- 0
- Tidak relevan
- 0
- Pemasangan
- 0
- Diblokir risiko
- 0
- Perlu penyiapan
- 0
- Produksi
- 0
Belum ada data hasil Agent. Eksekusi pertama dapat melaporkan keberhasilan, kebutuhan setup, blok risiko, kegagalan, atau tidak relevan melalui /api/agent/outcome.
Pasang
Tambahkan ke alur Agent
Gratis dan sumber terbuka. Tinjau laporan sebelum memasang pada Agent produksi.
Siklus pertumbuhan
Kit berbagi
Draf berbasis skenario untuk gh-create-issue, siap untuk posting manual di X.
A practical pick for the next repo task: gh-create-issue: Use when user wants to create a GitHub issue for the current repository. Must read and follow the repository's issue templa... 50.9K stars https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/cherryhq-gh-create-issue?ref=x
Balasan opsional dengan perintah pemasangan
Listing + install path for gh-create-issue: https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/cherryhq-gh-create-issue?ref=x Install: npx skills add CherryHQ/cherry-studio --skill gh-create-issue
Sumber listing
Diindeks Registry
Listing ini diindeks dari sumber publik dan belum ditandai resmi hingga klaim pemelihara disetujui.
- Kreator
- CherryHQ
- Sumber
- CherryHQ/cherry-studio
- Diindeks oleh
- Indeks komunitas OpenAgentSkill
Atribusi menautkan ke repositori publik atau profil kreator. Kreator dapat mengklaim listing untuk memperbarui sinyal kepemilikan.
Klaim skill iniKlaim pemilik
Klaim listing skill ini
Listing Diindeks Registry ini dikaitkan dengan CherryHQ, tetapi belum ditandai resmi. Klaim untuk menambahkan sinyal pemilik terverifikasi dan membuat pembaruan peluncuran, pemasangan, serta audit berikutnya lebih tepercaya.
Kit backlink kreator
Tambahkan badge bukti ke README Anda
Tampilkan listing kanonis, sinyal kepercayaan dan audit saat ini, serta bukti Agent-Proven nyata di tempat pengembang mengevaluasi repositori.
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/cherryhq-gh-create-issue)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/cherryhq-gh-create-issue)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/cherryhq-gh-create-issue/audit)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/cherryhq-gh-create-issue)Penulis
CherryHQ
@cherryhq
Tag
Kecocokan platform
Sinyal kesehatan
- Star GitHub
- 50.9K
- Skor kualitas
- 56/100
- Push GitHub terakhir
- 22 Agu 2026
- Petunjuk framework
- Tidak diketahui
- Tampilan OpenAgentSkill
- 3
- Salinan pemasangan
- 0
- Klik keluar
- 0
Sinyal komunitas
Bagikan apakah skill ini bermanfaat untuk alur kerja Agent Anda. Masukan gabungan meningkatkan peringkat dari waktu ke waktu.
Kepercayaan & keamanan
Hanya sandbox
- Adopsi GitHub51K star GitHubLulus
- Aktivitas star/fork51K star dan 4.8K fork; aktivitas issue tidak tersedia dalam metadata saat iniLulus
- Pemeliharaan terbaruDiperbarui hari iniLulus
- Kejelasan lisensiAGPL-3.0Lulus
- Kelengkapan README/SKILL.mdMetadata memuat konteks penggunaan dan alur kerja yang cukupLulus
- Risiko dependensi/runtimecommand execution surface, network or browser surfaceInfo
Skill terkait
Code Review
Review a branch or diff against repository standards and the originating spec in two independent analysis passes.
168.6K StarGrill With Docs
A relentless interview that pressure-tests a plan against the codebase, sharpens domain language, and updates CONTEXT.md and ADRs when decisions become durable.
164.7K StarTo Spec
Turn the current conversation and codebase context into a structured implementation spec, then publish it to the configured project issue tracker.
164.7K StarTo Tickets
Break a plan, spec, or conversation into independently actionable tracer-bullet tickets with explicit blocking relationships.
176.7K Star