gh-create-issue
Use when user wants to create a GitHub issue for the current repository. Must read and follow the repository's issue template format.
Supply asset profile
Coding and developer agents
Code review, repo analysis, testing, CI, GitHub, DevOps, and developer workflow skills.
Scenario
Coding agents
I need a coding agent that can understand a repository, edit code, and review pull requests.
Agent fit
Claude Code + Browser agents + CLI
Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, CLI, or custom agents.
Install
Ready
npx skills add CherryHQ/cherry-studio --skill gh-create-issue
Maintenance
fresh
Pushed today
Risk
Needs review
Permission surface may require sandboxing
GitHub quality
51K
93/100 Quality · 83/100 Trust
Coverage tags
Review notes
Permission surface may require sandboxing · Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision
Agent adoption scorecard
Trust, audit, and install readiness at a glance
These scores combine public repository metadata, OpenAgentSkill review signals, maintenance freshness, and install readiness. They are a shortlist signal, not a replacement for human review.
Quality
ExcellentHigh-confidence pick with strong adoption and healthy maintenance signals.
Trust
Sandbox onlyUseful candidate with missing or mixed trust signals. Keep it in an isolated workspace until the outcome loop proves task fit.
Audit
Needs reviewA machine-readable review of install readiness, security metadata, maintenance, and adoption risk.
OpenAgentSkill Trust Score v5
Human review before install
Run only in a sandbox and compare close alternatives before using it for real work.
Stars
51K GitHub stars
Repo activity
51K stars, 4.8K forks
Maintenance
Pushed today
License
AGPL-3.0
Install
npx skills add CherryHQ/cherry-studio --skill gh-create-issue
Install safety
standard package or runtime install path
Permission surface
shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
Agent outcomes
No agent outcome data yet
Docs
Strong README/SKILL.md context
Risk summary
Review before production
- Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision.
- Permission surface needs review: shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
- Permission surface: shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
Install readiness
Install path available
- Install path is available
- Repository evidence is available
- License is declared
- No Agent Proven outcome evidence yet
Agent-readable metadata
Machine-readable decision data for this skill.
Use this block or the embedded JSON to decide whether an agent should install this skill, choose an alternative, or ask for human review first.
Suited tasks
- Coding agents workflows
- Claude Code teams
- teams that value GitHub adoption signals
- Inspect source files
Suited agents
Install decision
- Command
- npx skills add CherryHQ/cherry-studio --skill gh-create-issue
- Policy
- review
- Human review
- yes
Trust and risk
- Trust
- 75/100
- Audit
- 89/100
- Risk level
- Needs review
Outcome loop
- Endpoint
- /api/agent/outcome
- Event ID
- resolve
- Outcomes
- 5
Install command
npx skills add CherryHQ/cherry-studio --skill gh-create-issueDo not use when
- teams that need a vendor-supported SLA
- high-compliance environments without internal security review
- No major risk signals from current metadata
- High-risk permission hints: Shell or command execution
- Permission surface may require sandboxing
Alternative
Code Review
168.6K Stars
npx skills add mattpocock/skills --skill code-review
Alternative
Grill With Docs
164.7K Stars
npx skills add mattpocock/skills --skill grill-with-docs
Alternative
To Spec
164.7K Stars
npx skills add mattpocock/skills --skill to-spec
Alternative
To Tickets
176.7K Stars
npx skills add mattpocock/skills --skill to-tickets
Agent safety v2
57/100 · Review before install
Sparse or mixed signals. Useful for discovery, but not for autonomous installation.
Test manually in an isolated workspace and compare against safer alternatives.
high
Shell or command execution
Skill metadata references terminal, CLI, shell, subprocess, or command execution workflows.
medium
Browser automation
Skill may drive a browser or interact with web pages.
medium
Network access
Skill likely fetches remote pages, APIs, repositories, or external services.
medium
Filesystem access
Skill may read or write project files, documents, generated artifacts, or local workspace state.
- High-risk permission hints: Shell or command execution
- Permission surface may require sandboxing
Install targets
Install this skill in your agent workflow
Use the public install endpoint to fetch the command, safety checklist, target prompts, and canonical links for this skill.
OpenAgentSkill CLI
Resolve policy, run the source installer safely, and report a verified install receipt.
$ npx --yes https://github.com/Leon-Drq/openagentskill/releases/download/cli-v0.2.1/openagentskill-0.2.1.tgz install cherryhq-gh-create-issueAgent resolve plan
Let an agent verify fit before installing.
The Resolve API returns the selected skill, alternatives, safety policy, audit notes, install target, and copy-paste prompt an agent can follow without scraping this page.
Open JSON
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20gh-create-issue%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Resolve text
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20gh-create-issue%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium&format=text
Install handoff
/api/skills/cherryhq-gh-create-issue/install
Agent should check
- Task fit and alternatives from Resolve API.
- Audit score, trust score, and safety policy warnings.
- Install target compatibility for Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, or CLI.
Copy prompt
Task: Use gh-create-issue in this workspace.
Resolve first: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20gh-create-issue%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Review install handoff: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/cherryhq-gh-create-issue/install
Install command: npx skills add CherryHQ/cherry-studio --skill gh-create-issue
Before running it, summarize audit warnings, required permissions, and the fallback skill if install is risky.Agent handoff
Give an agent the install path, not another directory page.
Use the public install endpoint to fetch the command, safety checklist, target prompts, and canonical links for this skill.
Install handoff
/api/skills/cherryhq-gh-create-issue/install
LLM text format
/api/skills/cherryhq-gh-create-issue/install?format=text
Find alternatives
/api/skills/search?q=gh-create-issue&limit=3
Agent prompt
Use gh-create-issue for this task. Review https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/cherryhq-gh-create-issue/install, then install with: npx skills add CherryHQ/cherry-studio --skill gh-create-issueRegistry metadata
Agent-readable profile for automatic skill selection.
This page exposes the same decision, trust, audit, use-case, and install signals through the Registry API, so agents can rank this skill without scraping the UI.
Manifest
/api/registry/manifest/cherryhq-gh-create-issue
LLM text
/api/registry/manifest/cherryhq-gh-create-issue?format=text
Install alias
/api/registry/install/cherryhq-gh-create-issue
Recommend
/api/registry/recommend?task=Use%20gh-create-issue%20in%20an%20agent%20workflow&limit=3
Agent fit
Coding agents
Use-case tags
Platforms
Claude Code, Browser agents
Audit report
Needs review · 89/100
A machine-readable review of install readiness, security metadata, maintenance, and adoption risk.
Agent decision cockpit
Primary pick for Coding agents
Use this as a leading candidate, then validate the README and install path in your own agent stack.
Role in stack
Primary pick
Primary fit
Coding agents
Trust label
Production-ready
Install path
Command ready
Use when
- Coding agents workflows
- Claude Code teams
- teams that value GitHub adoption signals
Evidence
- 50,908 GitHub stars
- recent repository activity
- install command or GitHub repo available
- 93/100 quality profile
- 3 OpenAgentSkill engagement events
review first
- No major risk signals from current metadata
Implementation path
- 1Install it in a sandbox agent and run one Coding agents task end to end.
- 2Compare output quality, latency, and failure behavior against at least one alternative.
- 3Promote it into production only after reviewing repository permissions, license, and maintenance signals.
Trust profile
Sandbox only
Useful candidate with missing or mixed trust signals. Keep it in an isolated workspace until the outcome loop proves task fit.
GitHub adoption
PASS51K GitHub stars
Stars/forks activity
PASS51K stars, 4.8K forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
Recent maintenance
PASSPushed today
License clarity
PASSAGPL-3.0
Good signals
- AI review approved
- Install path is available
- Repository evidence is available
- Recently maintained repository
- Large GitHub adoption signal
- Install command has no obvious high-risk pattern
- Outcome loop is ready but needs first real agent run
Review before install
- Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision.
- Permission surface needs review: shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
- Permission surface: shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
- No real agent outcome reports yet
- Human review required before unattended installation
Recommended action
Run only in a sandbox and compare close alternatives before using it for real work.
Quality profile
Excellent candidate for agent workflows
High-confidence pick with strong adoption and healthy maintenance signals.
Workflow fit
Use this skill in these scenarios
Build and ship code
Coding agents
I need a coding agent that can understand a repository, edit code, and review pull requests.
Manage repositories
GitHub automation
I need my agent to triage GitHub issues, review pull requests, and summarize repository changes.
Operate web apps
Browser automation
I need my agent to control a browser, fill forms, and verify web app workflows.
Workflow fit
Add it to a complete workflow
Inspect, patch, and verify code
Coding review agent
A workflow for software agents that inspect repositories, review pull requests, generate tests, and turn findings into shippable patches.
Turn skills into distribution
Content growth agent
A workflow for turning newly indexed skills into SEO briefs, social drafts, comparison pages, and reusable publishing workflows.
Operate and verify web apps
Browser QA agent
A workflow for agents that navigate products, fill forms, take screenshots, and verify real user flows across web applications.
Alternative shortlist
Compare before you install
Similar skills that may fit this task.
Code Review
Review a branch or diff against repository standards and the originating spec in two independent analysis passes.
Grill With Docs
A relentless interview that pressure-tests a plan against the codebase, sharpens domain language, and updates CONTEXT.md and ADRs when decisions become durable.
To Spec
Turn the current conversation and codebase context into a structured implementation spec, then publish it to the configured project issue tracker.
To Tickets
Break a plan, spec, or conversation into independently actionable tracer-bullet tickets with explicit blocking relationships.
Overview
--- name: gh-create-issue description: Use when user wants to create a GitHub issue for the current repository. Must read and follow the repository's issue template format. ---
# GitHub Create Issue
Use this skill when the user requests to create an issue. Must follow the repository's issue template format.
## Workflow
### Step 1: Determine Template Type
Analyze the user's request to determine the issue type: - If the user describes a problem, error, crash, or something not working -> Bug Report - If the user requests a new feature, enhancement, or additional support -> Feature Request - If the user is asking a question or needs help with something -> Questions & Discussion - If the user describes engineering work with no user-facing behavior change (a follow-up deferred from a pull request, technical debt, refactoring, tooling or CI work) -> Engineering Task - Otherwise -> Others
Engineering Task is not a GitHub issue form and is not offered to regular users. Only select it when the request clearly describes internal engineering work.
**If unclear**, ask the user which template to use. Do not default to "Others" on your own.
#### Eligibility Check (Engineering Task only)
Engineering Task is meant for maintainers and collaborators with write access. This is a request, not an access control — nothing prevents anyone from calling `gh issue create` directly, and this skill does not try to. The check below is here so that a contributor without write access learns that early and gets pointed somewhere more useful.
Before collecting any information, read the authenticated user's permission level:
```bash repo="$(gh repo view --json nameWithOwner --jq .nameWithOwner)" user="$(gh api user --jq .login)" permission="$(gh api "repos/$repo/collaborators/$user/permission" --jq .permission 2>/dev/null)" case "$permission" in admin | write) echo "eligible" ;; *) echo "not eligible" ;; esac ```
Only `admin` and `write` are eligible (`maintain` reports as `write`). Always compare the returned value: on a public repository this endpoint answers `read` for any user, including one who is not a collaborator at all, so a successful call proves nothing on its own. Do not use `repos/{owner}/{repo}/collaborators/{user}` here — it answers `204` for `read`- and `triage`-only collaborators, who are not the intended audience for this template.
If the result is anything else, do not use this template. Explain that it is meant for maintainers with write access, politely ask the contributor to use one of the public templates instead, and offer to help them file it there — their report is welcome, just not under this template. Do not quietly switch templates while keeping the Engineering Task labels or issue type.
### Step 2: Read the Selected Template
1. Read the corresponding template file from `.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/` directory. 2. Identify required fields (`validations.required: true`), title prefix (`title`), labels (`labels`, if present), and issue type (`type`, if present).
For Engineering Task, read [references/engineering-task.md](references/engineering-task.md) instead — it lives outside `.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/` on purpose and carries its own title prefix, labels, issue type, and body structure.
### Step 3: Collect Information
Based on the selected template, ask the user for required information only. Follow the template's required fields and option constraints (for example, Platform and Priority choices).
### Step 4: Build and Preview Issue Content
Create a temp file and write the issue content: - Use `issue_body_file="$(mktemp /tmp/gh-issue-body-XXXXXX).md"` - Use the exact title prefix from the selected template. - Fill content following the template body structure and section order. - Apply labels exactly as defined by the template. - Keep all labels when there are multiple labels. - If template has no labels, do not add custom labels. - Apply the issue type exactly as defined by the template's `type` field.
Preview the temp file content. **Show the file path** (e.g., `/tmp/gh-issue-body-XXXXXX.md`) and ask for confirmation before creating. **Skip this step if the user explicitly indicates no preview/confirmation is needed** (for example, automation workflows).
### Step 5: Create Issue
Use `gh issue create` command to create the issue.
Use a unique temp file for the body:
```bash issue_body_file="$(mktemp /tmp/gh-issue-body-XXXXXX).md" cat > "$issue_body_file" <<'EOF' ...issue body built from selected template... EOF ```
Create the issue using values from the selected template:
```bash gh issue create --title "<title_with_template_prefix>" --body-file "$issue_body_file" ```
If the selected template includes labels, append one `--label` per label:
```bash gh issue create --title "<title_with_template_prefix>" --body-file "$issue_body_file" --label "<label_1_from_template>" --label "<label_2_from_template>" ```
If the selected template has no labels, do not pass `--label`.
If the selected template declares a `type`, pass it as well. `--body-file` does not carry the issue type over on its own, so omitting this leaves the issue untyped:
```bash gh issue create --title "<title_with_template_prefix>" --body-file "$issue_body_file" --type "<type_from_template>" ```
`--template` and `--web` resolve against `.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/` on the default branch, so neither works for Engineering Task. Build the body locally for it.
For the other templates you may use `--template` as a starting point (use the exact template name from the repository):
```bash gh issue create --template "<template_name>" ```
Use the `--web` flag to open the creation page in browser when complex formatting is needed:
```bash gh issue create --web ```
Clean up the temp file after creation:
```bash rm -f "$issue_body_file" ```
## Notes
- Must read template files under `.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/` (or `references/` for Engineering Task) to ensure following the correct format. - Treat template files as the only source of truth. Do not hardcode title prefixes, labels, or issue types in this skill. - Title must be clear and concise, avoid vague terms like "a suggestion" or "stuck". - Provide as much detail as possible to help developers understand and resolve the issue. - If user doesn't specify a template type, ask them to choose one first.
Technical details
- Version
- 1.0.0
- License
- AGPL-3.0
- Last updated
- Aug 22, 2026
- Published
- Aug 20, 2026
Decision snapshot
Primary pick
50,908 GitHub stars
Audit
Install review
Install and adoption review
- Security
- 81/100
- Maintenance
- 100/100
- Install
- 92/100
Agent-proven evidence
Agent-proven evidence
Outcome reports after resolve, review, install, and one narrow run.
- Success rate
- —
- Recent failure
- —
- Outcomes
- 0
- Output quality
- —
- Failed
- 0
- Not relevant
- 0
- Installs
- 0
- Risk blocked
- 0
- Setup needed
- 0
- Production
- 0
No agent outcome data yet. The first agent run can report success, setup needs, risk blocks, failure, or not-relevant through /api/agent/outcome.
Install
Add to agent workflow
Free and open source. Review the report before installing into production agents.
Growth loop
Share kit
Scenario-led draft for gh-create-issue, ready for a manual X post.
A practical pick for the next repo task: gh-create-issue: Use when user wants to create a GitHub issue for the current repository. Must read and follow the repository's issue templa... 50.9K stars https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/cherryhq-gh-create-issue?ref=x
Optional reply with install command
Listing + install path for gh-create-issue: https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/cherryhq-gh-create-issue?ref=x Install: npx skills add CherryHQ/cherry-studio --skill gh-create-issue
Listing source
Registry indexed
This listing was indexed from public sources and is not marked official until a maintainer claim is approved.
- Creator
- CherryHQ
- Source
- CherryHQ/cherry-studio
- Indexed by
- OpenAgentSkill community index
Attribution links to the public repository or creator profile. Creators can claim the listing to update ownership signals.
Claim this skillOwner claim
Claim this skill listing
This Registry indexed listing is attributed to CherryHQ but is not marked official yet. Claim it to add a verified owner signal and make future launch, install, and audit updates easier to trust.
Creator backlink kit
Add the evidence badges to your README
Show the canonical listing, current trust and audit signals, and real Agent-Proven evidence where developers evaluate the repository.
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/cherryhq-gh-create-issue)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/cherryhq-gh-create-issue)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/cherryhq-gh-create-issue/audit)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/cherryhq-gh-create-issue)Author
CherryHQ
@cherryhq
Tags
Platform fit
Health signals
- GitHub stars
- 50.9K
- Quality score
- 56/100
- Last GitHub push
- Aug 22, 2026
- Framework hints
- Unknown
- OpenAgentSkill views
- 3
- Install copies
- 0
- Outbound clicks
- 0
Community signal
Share whether this skill looks useful for your agent workflow. Aggregated feedback improves rankings over time.
Trust & safety
Sandbox only
- GitHub adoption51K GitHub starsPASS
- Stars/forks activity51K stars, 4.8K forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadataPASS
- Recent maintenancePushed todayPASS
- License clarityAGPL-3.0PASS
- README/SKILL.md completenessMetadata includes enough usage and workflow contextPASS
- Dependency/runtime riskcommand execution surface, network or browser surfaceINFO
Related skills
Code Review
Review a branch or diff against repository standards and the originating spec in two independent analysis passes.
168.6K StarsGrill With Docs
A relentless interview that pressure-tests a plan against the codebase, sharpens domain language, and updates CONTEXT.md and ADRs when decisions become durable.
164.7K StarsTo Spec
Turn the current conversation and codebase context into a structured implementation spec, then publish it to the configured project issue tracker.
164.7K StarsTo Tickets
Break a plan, spec, or conversation into independently actionable tracer-bullet tickets with explicit blocking relationships.
176.7K Stars