gh-create-issue

REVIEW · 75
Registry indexed

Use when user wants to create a GitHub issue for the current repository. Must read and follow the repository's issue template format.

Verified installs0
Stars50.9K
Version1.0.0
Quality93/100 · Excellent
Trust75/100 · Sandbox only
Audit89/100 · Needs review

Supply asset profile

Coding and developer agents

Code review, repo analysis, testing, CI, GitHub, DevOps, and developer workflow skills.

Browse track

Scenario

Coding agents

I need a coding agent that can understand a repository, edit code, and review pull requests.

Agent fit

Claude Code + Browser agents + CLI

Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, CLI, or custom agents.

Install

Ready

npx skills add CherryHQ/cherry-studio --skill gh-create-issue

Maintenance

fresh

Pushed today

Risk

Needs review

Permission surface may require sandboxing

GitHub quality

51K

93/100 Quality · 83/100 Trust

Coverage tags

CodingCoding agentscoding-agentsagent-skill

Review notes

Permission surface may require sandboxing · Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision

Agent adoption scorecard

Trust, audit, and install readiness at a glance

These scores combine public repository metadata, OpenAgentSkill review signals, maintenance freshness, and install readiness. They are a shortlist signal, not a replacement for human review.

Quality

Excellent
93

High-confidence pick with strong adoption and healthy maintenance signals.

Trust

Sandbox only
75

Useful candidate with missing or mixed trust signals. Keep it in an isolated workspace until the outcome loop proves task fit.

Audit

Needs review
89

A machine-readable review of install readiness, security metadata, maintenance, and adoption risk.

OpenAgentSkill Trust Score v5

Human review before install

Run only in a sandbox and compare close alternatives before using it for real work.

CodexClaude CodeCursorOpenAgentSkill CLI

Stars

51K GitHub stars

Repo activity

51K stars, 4.8K forks

Maintenance

Pushed today

License

AGPL-3.0

Install

npx skills add CherryHQ/cherry-studio --skill gh-create-issue

Install safety

standard package or runtime install path

Permission surface

shell or command execution, filesystem or document access

Agent outcomes

No agent outcome data yet

Docs

Strong README/SKILL.md context

Risk summary

Review before production

  • Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision.
  • Permission surface needs review: shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
  • Permission surface: shell or command execution, filesystem or document access

Install readiness

Install path available

  • Install path is available
  • Repository evidence is available
  • License is declared
  • No Agent Proven outcome evidence yet

Agent-readable metadata

Machine-readable decision data for this skill.

Use this block or the embedded JSON to decide whether an agent should install this skill, choose an alternative, or ask for human review first.

Open JSON

Suited tasks

  • Coding agents workflows
  • Claude Code teams
  • teams that value GitHub adoption signals
  • Inspect source files

Suited agents

CodexClaude CodeCursorOpenAgentSkill CLIBrowser agentsCLI

Install decision

Command
npx skills add CherryHQ/cherry-studio --skill gh-create-issue
Policy
review
Human review
yes

Trust and risk

Trust
75/100
Audit
89/100
Risk level
Needs review

Outcome loop

Endpoint
/api/agent/outcome
Event ID
resolve
Outcomes
5

Install command

npx skills add CherryHQ/cherry-studio --skill gh-create-issue

Do not use when

  • teams that need a vendor-supported SLA
  • high-compliance environments without internal security review
  • No major risk signals from current metadata
  • High-risk permission hints: Shell or command execution
  • Permission surface may require sandboxing

Agent safety v2

57/100 · Review before install

Experimentalreview

Sparse or mixed signals. Useful for discovery, but not for autonomous installation.

Test manually in an isolated workspace and compare against safer alternatives.

Resolve via API

high

Shell or command execution

Skill metadata references terminal, CLI, shell, subprocess, or command execution workflows.

medium

Browser automation

Skill may drive a browser or interact with web pages.

medium

Network access

Skill likely fetches remote pages, APIs, repositories, or external services.

medium

Filesystem access

Skill may read or write project files, documents, generated artifacts, or local workspace state.

  • High-risk permission hints: Shell or command execution
  • Permission surface may require sandboxing

Install targets

Install this skill in your agent workflow

Use the public install endpoint to fetch the command, safety checklist, target prompts, and canonical links for this skill.

skill install

OpenAgentSkill CLI

Resolve policy, run the source installer safely, and report a verified install receipt.

$ npx --yes https://github.com/Leon-Drq/openagentskill/releases/download/cli-v0.2.1/openagentskill-0.2.1.tgz install cherryhq-gh-create-issue

Agent resolve plan

Let an agent verify fit before installing.

The Resolve API returns the selected skill, alternatives, safety policy, audit notes, install target, and copy-paste prompt an agent can follow without scraping this page.

Open text plan

Agent should check

  • Task fit and alternatives from Resolve API.
  • Audit score, trust score, and safety policy warnings.
  • Install target compatibility for Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, or CLI.

Copy prompt

Task: Use gh-create-issue in this workspace.
Resolve first: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20gh-create-issue%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Review install handoff: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/cherryhq-gh-create-issue/install
Install command: npx skills add CherryHQ/cherry-studio --skill gh-create-issue
Before running it, summarize audit warnings, required permissions, and the fallback skill if install is risky.

Agent handoff

Give an agent the install path, not another directory page.

Use the public install endpoint to fetch the command, safety checklist, target prompts, and canonical links for this skill.

Open install API

Agent prompt

Use gh-create-issue for this task. Review https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/cherryhq-gh-create-issue/install, then install with: npx skills add CherryHQ/cherry-studio --skill gh-create-issue

Registry metadata

Agent-readable profile for automatic skill selection.

This page exposes the same decision, trust, audit, use-case, and install signals through the Registry API, so agents can rank this skill without scraping the UI.

Open manifest

Agent fit

100/100

Coding agents

Platforms

Claude Code, Browser agents

Audit report

Needs review · 89/100

A machine-readable review of install readiness, security metadata, maintenance, and adoption risk.

View audit reportView eval report

Agent decision cockpit

Primary pick for Coding agents

Use this as a leading candidate, then validate the README and install path in your own agent stack.

100
Readiness
Adopt
Stage

Role in stack

Primary pick

Primary fit

Coding agents

Trust label

Production-ready

Install path

Command ready

Use when

  • Coding agents workflows
  • Claude Code teams
  • teams that value GitHub adoption signals

Evidence

  • 50,908 GitHub stars
  • recent repository activity
  • install command or GitHub repo available
  • 93/100 quality profile
  • 3 OpenAgentSkill engagement events

review first

  • No major risk signals from current metadata

Implementation path

  1. 1Install it in a sandbox agent and run one Coding agents task end to end.
  2. 2Compare output quality, latency, and failure behavior against at least one alternative.
  3. 3Promote it into production only after reviewing repository permissions, license, and maintenance signals.

Trust profile

Sandbox only

Useful candidate with missing or mixed trust signals. Keep it in an isolated workspace until the outcome loop proves task fit.

75
OpenAgentSkill Trust Score

GitHub adoption

PASS

51K GitHub stars

Stars/forks activity

PASS

51K stars, 4.8K forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata

Recent maintenance

PASS

Pushed today

License clarity

PASS

AGPL-3.0

Good signals

  • AI review approved
  • Install path is available
  • Repository evidence is available
  • Recently maintained repository
  • Large GitHub adoption signal
  • Install command has no obvious high-risk pattern
  • Outcome loop is ready but needs first real agent run

Review before install

  • Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision.
  • Permission surface needs review: shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
  • Permission surface: shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
  • No real agent outcome reports yet
  • Human review required before unattended installation

Recommended action

Run only in a sandbox and compare close alternatives before using it for real work.

Quality profile

Excellent candidate for agent workflows

High-confidence pick with strong adoption and healthy maintenance signals.

93
GitHub stars
51K
Freshness
Today
Install ready
Yes
License
AGPL-3.0

Workflow fit

Use this skill in these scenarios

Workflow fit

Add it to a complete workflow

Alternative shortlist

Compare before you install

Similar skills that may fit this task.

Compare all

Overview

--- name: gh-create-issue description: Use when user wants to create a GitHub issue for the current repository. Must read and follow the repository's issue template format. ---

# GitHub Create Issue

Use this skill when the user requests to create an issue. Must follow the repository's issue template format.

## Workflow

### Step 1: Determine Template Type

Analyze the user's request to determine the issue type: - If the user describes a problem, error, crash, or something not working -> Bug Report - If the user requests a new feature, enhancement, or additional support -> Feature Request - If the user is asking a question or needs help with something -> Questions & Discussion - If the user describes engineering work with no user-facing behavior change (a follow-up deferred from a pull request, technical debt, refactoring, tooling or CI work) -> Engineering Task - Otherwise -> Others

Engineering Task is not a GitHub issue form and is not offered to regular users. Only select it when the request clearly describes internal engineering work.

**If unclear**, ask the user which template to use. Do not default to "Others" on your own.

#### Eligibility Check (Engineering Task only)

Engineering Task is meant for maintainers and collaborators with write access. This is a request, not an access control — nothing prevents anyone from calling `gh issue create` directly, and this skill does not try to. The check below is here so that a contributor without write access learns that early and gets pointed somewhere more useful.

Before collecting any information, read the authenticated user's permission level:

```bash repo="$(gh repo view --json nameWithOwner --jq .nameWithOwner)" user="$(gh api user --jq .login)" permission="$(gh api "repos/$repo/collaborators/$user/permission" --jq .permission 2>/dev/null)" case "$permission" in admin | write) echo "eligible" ;; *) echo "not eligible" ;; esac ```

Only `admin` and `write` are eligible (`maintain` reports as `write`). Always compare the returned value: on a public repository this endpoint answers `read` for any user, including one who is not a collaborator at all, so a successful call proves nothing on its own. Do not use `repos/{owner}/{repo}/collaborators/{user}` here — it answers `204` for `read`- and `triage`-only collaborators, who are not the intended audience for this template.

If the result is anything else, do not use this template. Explain that it is meant for maintainers with write access, politely ask the contributor to use one of the public templates instead, and offer to help them file it there — their report is welcome, just not under this template. Do not quietly switch templates while keeping the Engineering Task labels or issue type.

### Step 2: Read the Selected Template

1. Read the corresponding template file from `.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/` directory. 2. Identify required fields (`validations.required: true`), title prefix (`title`), labels (`labels`, if present), and issue type (`type`, if present).

For Engineering Task, read [references/engineering-task.md](references/engineering-task.md) instead — it lives outside `.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/` on purpose and carries its own title prefix, labels, issue type, and body structure.

### Step 3: Collect Information

Based on the selected template, ask the user for required information only. Follow the template's required fields and option constraints (for example, Platform and Priority choices).

### Step 4: Build and Preview Issue Content

Create a temp file and write the issue content: - Use `issue_body_file="$(mktemp /tmp/gh-issue-body-XXXXXX).md"` - Use the exact title prefix from the selected template. - Fill content following the template body structure and section order. - Apply labels exactly as defined by the template. - Keep all labels when there are multiple labels. - If template has no labels, do not add custom labels. - Apply the issue type exactly as defined by the template's `type` field.

Preview the temp file content. **Show the file path** (e.g., `/tmp/gh-issue-body-XXXXXX.md`) and ask for confirmation before creating. **Skip this step if the user explicitly indicates no preview/confirmation is needed** (for example, automation workflows).

### Step 5: Create Issue

Use `gh issue create` command to create the issue.

Use a unique temp file for the body:

```bash issue_body_file="$(mktemp /tmp/gh-issue-body-XXXXXX).md" cat > "$issue_body_file" <<'EOF' ...issue body built from selected template... EOF ```

Create the issue using values from the selected template:

```bash gh issue create --title "<title_with_template_prefix>" --body-file "$issue_body_file" ```

If the selected template includes labels, append one `--label` per label:

```bash gh issue create --title "<title_with_template_prefix>" --body-file "$issue_body_file" --label "<label_1_from_template>" --label "<label_2_from_template>" ```

If the selected template has no labels, do not pass `--label`.

If the selected template declares a `type`, pass it as well. `--body-file` does not carry the issue type over on its own, so omitting this leaves the issue untyped:

```bash gh issue create --title "<title_with_template_prefix>" --body-file "$issue_body_file" --type "<type_from_template>" ```

`--template` and `--web` resolve against `.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/` on the default branch, so neither works for Engineering Task. Build the body locally for it.

For the other templates you may use `--template` as a starting point (use the exact template name from the repository):

```bash gh issue create --template "<template_name>" ```

Use the `--web` flag to open the creation page in browser when complex formatting is needed:

```bash gh issue create --web ```

Clean up the temp file after creation:

```bash rm -f "$issue_body_file" ```

## Notes

- Must read template files under `.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/` (or `references/` for Engineering Task) to ensure following the correct format. - Treat template files as the only source of truth. Do not hardcode title prefixes, labels, or issue types in this skill. - Title must be clear and concise, avoid vague terms like "a suggestion" or "stuck". - Provide as much detail as possible to help developers understand and resolve the issue. - If user doesn't specify a template type, ask them to choose one first.

Technical details

Version
1.0.0
License
AGPL-3.0
Last updated
Aug 22, 2026
Published
Aug 20, 2026

Decision snapshot

Primary pick

100
Ready
Adopt
Stage

50,908 GitHub stars

Audit

Install review

Install and adoption review

89
Needs review
Security
81/100
Maintenance
100/100
Install
92/100
Open full auditView eval report

Agent-proven evidence

Agent-proven evidence

Outcome reports after resolve, review, install, and one narrow run.

0
Proven
Needs first agent runAuto-install: review firstLast: Unknown
Success rate
Recent failure
Outcomes
0
Output quality
Failed
0
Not relevant
0
Installs
0
Risk blocked
0
Setup needed
0
Production
0

No agent outcome data yet. The first agent run can report success, setup needs, risk blocks, failure, or not-relevant through /api/agent/outcome.

Install

Add to agent workflow

Free and open source. Review the report before installing into production agents.

Growth loop

Share kit

X

Scenario-led draft for gh-create-issue, ready for a manual X post.

Curator note
A practical pick for the next repo task:

gh-create-issue: Use when user wants to create a GitHub issue for the current repository. Must read and follow the repository's issue templa...

50.9K stars

https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/cherryhq-gh-create-issue?ref=x
Open X draft
Optional reply with install command
Listing + install path for gh-create-issue:
https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/cherryhq-gh-create-issue?ref=x

Install: npx skills add CherryHQ/cherry-studio --skill gh-create-issue

Listing source

Registry indexed

Claimable

This listing was indexed from public sources and is not marked official until a maintainer claim is approved.

Creator
CherryHQ
Indexed by
OpenAgentSkill community index

Attribution links to the public repository or creator profile. Creators can claim the listing to update ownership signals.

Claim this skill

Owner claim

Claim this skill listing

This Registry indexed listing is attributed to CherryHQ but is not marked official yet. Claim it to add a verified owner signal and make future launch, install, and audit updates easier to trust.

Creator backlink kit

Add the evidence badges to your README

Show the canonical listing, current trust and audit signals, and real Agent-Proven evidence where developers evaluate the repository.

[![Listed on OpenAgentSkill](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/cherryhq-gh-create-issue?metric=listed&label=Listed)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/cherryhq-gh-create-issue)
[![OpenAgentSkill Trust](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/cherryhq-gh-create-issue?metric=trust&label=Trust)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/cherryhq-gh-create-issue)
[![OpenAgentSkill Audit](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/cherryhq-gh-create-issue?metric=audit&label=Audit)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/cherryhq-gh-create-issue/audit)
[![Agent Proven](https://www.openagentskill.com/api/badge/cherryhq-gh-create-issue?metric=proven&label=Agent%20Proven)](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/cherryhq-gh-create-issue)

Author

C

CherryHQ

@cherryhq

Health signals

GitHub stars
50.9K
Quality score
56/100
Last GitHub push
Aug 22, 2026
Framework hints
Unknown
OpenAgentSkill views
3
Install copies
0
Outbound clicks
0

Community signal

Share whether this skill looks useful for your agent workflow. Aggregated feedback improves rankings over time.

Trust & safety

Sandbox only

75
  • GitHub adoption51K GitHub starsPASS
  • Stars/forks activity51K stars, 4.8K forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadataPASS
  • Recent maintenancePushed todayPASS
  • License clarityAGPL-3.0PASS
  • README/SKILL.md completenessMetadata includes enough usage and workflow contextPASS
  • Dependency/runtime riskcommand execution surface, network or browser surfaceINFO