cherry-pr-test
Test Cherry Studio PRs by resolving and checking out a PR, statically inspecting its changes, running interactive UI tests against a safely tracked Electron instance through CDP, producing a structured report, cleaning up only the owned test instance, and restoring the original b
Supply asset profile
Coding and developer agents
Code review, repo analysis, testing, CI, GitHub, DevOps, and developer workflow skills.
Scenario
GitHub automation
I need my agent to triage GitHub issues, review pull requests, and summarize repository changes.
Agent fit
Claude Code + Browser agents + CLI
Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, CLI, or custom agents.
Install
Ready
npx skills add CherryHQ/cherry-studio --skill cherry-pr-test
Maintenance
fresh
Pushed today
Risk
Needs review
Dependency or permission surface needs review
GitHub quality
51K
93/100 Quality · 82/100 Trust
Coverage tags
Review notes
Dependency or permission surface needs review · Permission surface may require sandboxing
Agent adoption scorecard
Trust, audit, and install readiness at a glance
These scores combine public repository metadata, OpenAgentSkill review signals, maintenance freshness, and install readiness. They are a shortlist signal, not a replacement for human review.
Quality
ExcellentHigh-confidence pick with strong adoption and healthy maintenance signals.
Trust
Sandbox onlyUseful candidate with missing or mixed trust signals. Keep it in an isolated workspace until the outcome loop proves task fit.
Audit
Needs reviewA machine-readable review of install readiness, security metadata, maintenance, and adoption risk.
OpenAgentSkill Trust Score v5
Human review before install
Run only in a sandbox and compare close alternatives before using it for real work.
Stars
51K GitHub stars
Repo activity
51K stars, 4.8K forks
Maintenance
Pushed today
License
AGPL-3.0
Install
npx skills add CherryHQ/cherry-studio --skill cherry-pr-test
Install safety
standard package or runtime install path
Permission surface
shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
Agent outcomes
No agent outcome data yet
Docs
Strong README/SKILL.md context
Risk summary
Review before production
- Permission surface needs review: shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
- Dependency/runtime risk: command execution surface, network or browser surface
- Permission surface: shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
Install readiness
Install path available
- Install path is available
- Repository evidence is available
- License is declared
- No Agent Proven outcome evidence yet
Agent-readable metadata
Machine-readable decision data for this skill.
Use this block or the embedded JSON to decide whether an agent should install this skill, choose an alternative, or ask for human review first.
Suited tasks
- GitHub automation workflows
- Claude Code teams
- teams that value GitHub adoption signals
- Inspect repository metadata
Suited agents
Install decision
- Command
- npx skills add CherryHQ/cherry-studio --skill cherry-pr-test
- Policy
- review
- Human review
- yes
Trust and risk
- Trust
- 74/100
- Audit
- 88/100
- Risk level
- Needs review
Outcome loop
- Endpoint
- /api/agent/outcome
- Event ID
- resolve
- Outcomes
- 5
Install command
npx skills add CherryHQ/cherry-studio --skill cherry-pr-testDo not use when
- teams that need a vendor-supported SLA
- high-compliance environments without internal security review
- No major risk signals from current metadata
- High-risk permission hints: Shell or command execution
- Dependency or permission surface needs review
Alternative
Last30days Skill
53.5K Stars
npx skills add mvanhorn/last30days-skill -g
Alternative
Academic Research Skills
38.4K Stars
npx skills add Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Alternative
GPT Researcher
28.0K Stars
npx skills add assafelovic/gpt-researcher
Alternative
DeepResearch
19.8K Stars
npx skills add Alibaba-NLP/DeepResearch
Agent safety v2
52/100 · Avoid automatic install
Sparse or mixed signals. Useful for discovery, but not for autonomous installation.
Test manually in an isolated workspace and compare against safer alternatives.
high
Shell or command execution
Skill metadata references terminal, CLI, shell, subprocess, or command execution workflows.
medium
Browser automation
Skill may drive a browser or interact with web pages.
medium
Network access
Skill likely fetches remote pages, APIs, repositories, or external services.
medium
Filesystem access
Skill may read or write project files, documents, generated artifacts, or local workspace state.
- High-risk permission hints: Shell or command execution
- Dependency or permission surface needs review
Install targets
Install this skill in your agent workflow
Use the public install endpoint to fetch the command, safety checklist, target prompts, and canonical links for this skill.
OpenAgentSkill CLI
Resolve policy, run the source installer safely, and report a verified install receipt.
$ npx --yes https://github.com/Leon-Drq/openagentskill/releases/download/cli-v0.2.1/openagentskill-0.2.1.tgz install cherryhq-cherry-pr-testAgent resolve plan
Let an agent verify fit before installing.
The Resolve API returns the selected skill, alternatives, safety policy, audit notes, install target, and copy-paste prompt an agent can follow without scraping this page.
Open JSON
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20cherry-pr-test%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Resolve text
/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20cherry-pr-test%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium&format=text
Install handoff
/api/skills/cherryhq-cherry-pr-test/install
Agent should check
- Task fit and alternatives from Resolve API.
- Audit score, trust score, and safety policy warnings.
- Install target compatibility for Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, or CLI.
Copy prompt
Task: Use cherry-pr-test in this workspace.
Resolve first: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/resolve?task=Use%20cherry-pr-test%20for%20an%20agent%20workflow&agent=codex&max_risk=medium
Review install handoff: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/cherryhq-cherry-pr-test/install
Install command: npx skills add CherryHQ/cherry-studio --skill cherry-pr-test
Before running it, summarize audit warnings, required permissions, and the fallback skill if install is risky.Agent handoff
Give an agent the install path, not another directory page.
Use the public install endpoint to fetch the command, safety checklist, target prompts, and canonical links for this skill.
Install handoff
/api/skills/cherryhq-cherry-pr-test/install
LLM text format
/api/skills/cherryhq-cherry-pr-test/install?format=text
Find alternatives
/api/skills/search?q=cherry-pr-test&limit=3
Agent prompt
Use cherry-pr-test for this task. Review https://www.openagentskill.com/api/skills/cherryhq-cherry-pr-test/install, then install with: npx skills add CherryHQ/cherry-studio --skill cherry-pr-testRegistry metadata
Agent-readable profile for automatic skill selection.
This page exposes the same decision, trust, audit, use-case, and install signals through the Registry API, so agents can rank this skill without scraping the UI.
Manifest
/api/registry/manifest/cherryhq-cherry-pr-test
LLM text
/api/registry/manifest/cherryhq-cherry-pr-test?format=text
Install alias
/api/registry/install/cherryhq-cherry-pr-test
Recommend
/api/registry/recommend?task=Use%20cherry-pr-test%20in%20an%20agent%20workflow&limit=3
Agent fit
GitHub automation
Use-case tags
Platforms
Claude Code, Browser agents
Audit report
Needs review · 88/100
A machine-readable review of install readiness, security metadata, maintenance, and adoption risk.
Agent decision cockpit
Primary pick for GitHub automation
Use this as a leading candidate, then validate the README and install path in your own agent stack.
Role in stack
Primary pick
Primary fit
GitHub automation
Trust label
Production-ready
Install path
Command ready
Use when
- GitHub automation workflows
- Claude Code teams
- teams that value GitHub adoption signals
Evidence
- 50,908 GitHub stars
- recent repository activity
- install command or GitHub repo available
- 93/100 quality profile
- 7 OpenAgentSkill engagement events
review first
- No major risk signals from current metadata
Implementation path
- 1Install it in a sandbox agent and run one GitHub automation task end to end.
- 2Compare output quality, latency, and failure behavior against at least one alternative.
- 3Promote it into production only after reviewing repository permissions, license, and maintenance signals.
Trust profile
Sandbox only
Useful candidate with missing or mixed trust signals. Keep it in an isolated workspace until the outcome loop proves task fit.
GitHub adoption
PASS51K GitHub stars
Stars/forks activity
PASS51K stars, 4.8K forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata
Recent maintenance
PASSPushed today
License clarity
PASSAGPL-3.0
Good signals
- AI review approved
- Install path is available
- Repository evidence is available
- Recently maintained repository
- Large GitHub adoption signal
- Install command has no obvious high-risk pattern
- Outcome loop is ready but needs first real agent run
Review before install
- Permission surface needs review: shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
- Dependency/runtime risk: command execution surface, network or browser surface
- Permission surface: shell or command execution, filesystem or document access
- No real agent outcome reports yet
- Human review required before unattended installation
Recommended action
Run only in a sandbox and compare close alternatives before using it for real work.
Quality profile
Excellent candidate for agent workflows
High-confidence pick with strong adoption and healthy maintenance signals.
Workflow fit
Use this skill in these scenarios
Manage repositories
GitHub automation
I need my agent to triage GitHub issues, review pull requests, and summarize repository changes.
Build and ship code
Coding agents
I need a coding agent that can understand a repository, edit code, and review pull requests.
Verify behavior
Testing and QA
I need my agent to test a web app, reproduce bugs, and verify fixes.
Workflow fit
Add it to a complete workflow
Inspect, patch, and verify code
Coding review agent
A workflow for software agents that inspect repositories, review pull requests, generate tests, and turn findings into shippable patches.
Operate and verify web apps
Browser QA agent
A workflow for agents that navigate products, fill forms, take screenshots, and verify real user flows across web applications.
Find, compare, and synthesize
Research report agent
A workflow for agents that gather sources, compare claims, summarize long material, and draft useful research briefs.
Alternative shortlist
Compare before you install
Similar skills that may fit this task.
Last30days Skill
Research the last 30 days across Reddit, X, YouTube, Hacker News, Polymarket, GitHub, and the web, then synthesize a grounded brief for an AI agent.
Academic Research Skills
Academic Research Skills for Claude Code: research → write → review → revise → finalize
GPT Researcher
Run autonomous deep research over web and local sources
DeepResearch
Tongyi Deep Research, the Leading Open-source Deep Research Agent
Overview
--- name: cherry-pr-test description: Test Cherry Studio PRs by resolving and checking out a PR, statically inspecting its changes, running interactive UI tests against a safely tracked Electron instance through CDP, producing a structured report, cleaning up only the owned test instance, and restoring the original branch. ---
# Cherry Studio PR Test
Use this workflow for a bounded PR test. Use `cherry-electron-dev` for ongoing implementation or debugging in the current checkout.
## Prerequisites and safety
- Require authenticated `gh`, `pnpm`, and installed project dependencies. - Use Playwright/CDP or optional `agent-browser` for UI control. - Before touching Electron, read [Electron Instance Management](../cherry-electron-dev/references/electron-instance.md) and select its `ephemeral` policy. - Treat that reference as the only authority for discovery, target selection, launch, replacement, shutdown, tracking, and troubleshooting. - Never discard local changes. Stop and ask if checkout would overwrite them. - Show the report before posting it anywhere.
`$ARGUMENTS` may contain a PR number, PR URL, `latest`/`recent`, or nothing.
## Workflow
### 1. Resolve and inspect the PR
If no PR is specified, list recent PRs and ask the user to choose unless they requested the latest:
```bash gh pr list --repo CherryHQ/cherry-studio --state open --limit 10 \ --json number,title,author,createdAt,headRefName,changedFiles ```
Record the current branch for restoration, inspect the PR, then check it out:
```bash git status --short git branch --show-current gh pr view <NUMBER> --json title,body,author,headRefName,files gh pr checkout <NUMBER> ```
Read the changed files and nearby instructions. Record the exact checked-out HEAD.
### 2. Analyze and start the app
Run static analysis while the app starts when both can proceed independently.
For static analysis:
```bash pnpm typecheck ```
Also check:
- blocked or deprecated v1/v2-refactor files - hardcoded user-visible strings instead of i18n - `console.log` instead of `loggerService` - missing types on new public interfaces
For Electron:
1. Use the shared reference to verify existing instances. 2. Reuse only an instance from this workspace whose recorded launch HEAD equals the checked-out PR HEAD. 3. When reusing one, mark it borrowed and preserve its existing policy and ownership. Never reclassify a persistent instance as ephemeral. 4. Otherwise gracefully replace only the verified same-workspace instance. 5. Launch an `ephemeral`, agent-owned instance with an isolated `CS_DEV_USER_DATA_SUFFIX`, such as `PR-<NUMBER>`. 6. Keep its managed terminal/session, PIDs, ports, log, exact target, and `pr-test:<NUMBER>` launch purpose in `instance.json`.
Do not use broad process or port cleanup.
### 3. Run interactive tests
Bind the controller to the exact target returned by the shared reference. Never navigate to a guessed root URL or select a target by index.
Build test cases from the PR description and changed files:
1. Capture the initial state. 2. Inspect interactive elements with the available CDP controller. 3. Exercise the changed behavior. 4. Capture the result and verify relevant persisted state. 5. Repeat edge cases justified by the change.
Consider UI rendering, interactions, persistence, light/dark themes, relevant window sizes, i18n, empty states, and rapid interaction only when in scope.
Store screenshots and the report under `/tmp/pr-<NUMBER>/`:
```bash mkdir -p /tmp/pr-<NUMBER> ```
If an isolated profile shows the migration wizard or splash, follow the shared troubleshooting guidance and startup logs. Do not reset or force-close data.
### 4. Clean up and restore
Use the shared `ephemeral` finish procedure. Stop only an instance launched by this PR-test workflow whose verified record remains `ephemeral`, agent-owned, and scoped to `pr-test:<NUMBER>`. Leave every borrowed instance running. Do not stop unrelated workspaces or packaged apps.
Restore the branch recorded before checkout. If it no longer exists, resolve the repository default branch and report the fallback before switching:
```bash git checkout <ORIGINAL_BRANCH> ```
### 5. Report
Save `/tmp/pr-<NUMBER>/report.md` and show it to the user. Match the report language to the user's language; the template uses English labels:
```markdown # PR #<NUMBER> Test Report
**Title**: <title> **Author**: @<author> **Branch**: <branch> **Changed files**: <count>
## Static Analysis
| Check | Result | Notes | | --- | --- | --- | | TypeScript typecheck | ✅/❌ | ... | | Blocked-file check | ✅/⚠️ | ... | | Logging, i18n, and types | ✅/❌ | ... |
## UI Tests
### <Test Case>
<scenario, evidence, and result>

## Findings
<findings or none>
## Conclusion
- Total findings: N - Recommendation: APPROVE / REQUEST_CHANGES / COMMENT ```
Do not post the report or submit a GitHub review unless the user explicitly asks.
Technical details
- Version
- 1.0.0
- License
- AGPL-3.0
- Last updated
- Aug 22, 2026
- Published
- Aug 20, 2026
Decision snapshot
Primary pick
50,908 GitHub stars
Audit
Install review
Install and adoption review
- Security
- 79/100
- Maintenance
- 100/100
- Install
- 92/100
Agent-proven evidence
Agent-proven evidence
Outcome reports after resolve, review, install, and one narrow run.
- Success rate
- —
- Recent failure
- —
- Outcomes
- 0
- Output quality
- —
- Failed
- 0
- Not relevant
- 0
- Installs
- 0
- Risk blocked
- 0
- Setup needed
- 0
- Production
- 0
No agent outcome data yet. The first agent run can report success, setup needs, risk blocks, failure, or not-relevant through /api/agent/outcome.
Install
Add to agent workflow
Free and open source. Review the report before installing into production agents.
Growth loop
Share kit
Scenario-led draft for cherry-pr-test, ready for a manual X post.
cherry-pr-test: Test Cherry Studio PRs by resolving and checking out a PR, statically inspecting its changes,... 50.9K stars https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/cherryhq-cherry-pr-test?ref=x
Optional reply with install command
Listing + install path for cherry-pr-test: https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/cherryhq-cherry-pr-test?ref=x Install: npx skills add CherryHQ/cherry-studio --skill cherry-pr-test
Listing source
Registry indexed
This listing was indexed from public sources and is not marked official until a maintainer claim is approved.
- Creator
- CherryHQ
- Source
- CherryHQ/cherry-studio
- Indexed by
- OpenAgentSkill community index
Attribution links to the public repository or creator profile. Creators can claim the listing to update ownership signals.
Claim this skillOwner claim
Claim this skill listing
This Registry indexed listing is attributed to CherryHQ but is not marked official yet. Claim it to add a verified owner signal and make future launch, install, and audit updates easier to trust.
Creator backlink kit
Add the evidence badges to your README
Show the canonical listing, current trust and audit signals, and real Agent-Proven evidence where developers evaluate the repository.
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/cherryhq-cherry-pr-test)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/cherryhq-cherry-pr-test)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/cherryhq-cherry-pr-test/audit)
[](https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/cherryhq-cherry-pr-test)Author
CherryHQ
@cherryhq
Tags
Platform fit
Health signals
- GitHub stars
- 50.9K
- Quality score
- 56/100
- Last GitHub push
- Aug 22, 2026
- Framework hints
- Unknown
- OpenAgentSkill views
- 7
- Install copies
- 0
- Outbound clicks
- 0
Community signal
Share whether this skill looks useful for your agent workflow. Aggregated feedback improves rankings over time.
Trust & safety
Sandbox only
- GitHub adoption51K GitHub starsPASS
- Stars/forks activity51K stars, 4.8K forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadataPASS
- Recent maintenancePushed todayPASS
- License clarityAGPL-3.0PASS
- README/SKILL.md completenessMetadata includes enough usage and workflow contextPASS
- Dependency/runtime riskcommand execution surface, network or browser surfaceCHECK
Related skills
Last30days Skill
Research the last 30 days across Reddit, X, YouTube, Hacker News, Polymarket, GitHub, and the web, then synthesize a grounded brief for an AI agent.
53.5K StarsAcademic Research Skills
Academic Research Skills for Claude Code: research → write → review → revise → finalize
38.4K StarsGPT Researcher
Run autonomous deep research over web and local sources
28.0K StarsDeepResearch
Tongyi Deep Research, the Leading Open-source Deep Research Agent
19.8K Stars