Adversarial code review that breaks the self-review monoculture. Use when you want a genuinely critical review of recent changes, before merging a PR, or when you suspect Claude is being too agreeable about code quality. Forces perspective shifts through hostile reviewer personas that catch blind spots the author's mental model shares with the reviewer.
Skill ディレクトリ
AI Agent のための再利用可能な Skill を見つける。
すべての推奨は、リポジトリ、監査、インストール経路に明確につながっています。
検索結果: breach
英語版ディレクトリEmail OSINT & Password breach hunting tool, locally or using premium services. Supports chasing down related email
Free email OSINT tool, 2500+ platforms, identity clustering, breach detection. No API keys required. pip install mailaccess
Cyber threat intelligence and OSINT analysis toolkit. Runs structured investigations and delivers analyst-grade intelligence products with sourced, trust-scored findings. Use for OSINT and CTI cases, digital-footprint and exposure review, domain/subdomain/DNS/certificate recon, web-infrastructure pivoting (favicon hashes, tracker IDs, TLS certs, phishing-kit fingerprinting, campaign clustering), username/email/phone enumeration, breach and infostealer-log triage, image forensics, geolocation, crypto-wallet and IBAN/bank-account tracing, darknet search, M365/Azure and SaaS tenant recon, China/Sinophone recon (ICP filings, PRC corporate registries, Baidu/FOFA/Quake/ZoomEye), vulnerability and ransomware lookup, threat modeling, PII redaction, and structured reporting. Commands include /case, /sweep, /query, /webpivot, /username, /phone, /email-deep, /breach-deep, /icp, /cn-corp, /iban, /stealer-log, /exposure, /threat-model, /report, /brief, /redact, /apikeys.
Scraping + AI-provider standards — the Scraper trait & SCRAPERS registry, selector resilience, rate-limiting/cancellation, and the provider-abstraction (zero-change) rule for embeddings/streaming/prompts. Load for changes under scraping/, ai_provider/, packages/prompts, documents/embed.
Diagnose why a SigNoz alert fired by correlating the alert's own signal with neighbor signals (error rate, latency, throughput, CPU/memory), traces, and logs around the fire window — and rank likely causes. Make sure to use this skill whenever the user asks "why did this alert fire", "what caused alert X", "investigate this alert", "RCA for the alert that paged me", "what's wrong with [service]" in the context of a recent fire, or otherwise asks for a root-cause analysis of a firing or recently-fired alert. Read-only — does not modify any alert or notification.
Describe what an existing SigNoz alert rule does in plain language — the signal it watches, the threshold and evaluation behavior, the notification routing, and a one-line fire-frequency summary so the user knows whether the alert has been active. Make sure to use this skill whenever the user asks "what does this alert do", "explain alert X", "walk me through this rule", "how does my [Y] alert work", "is this alert configured correctly", or otherwise asks for an interpretation of an existing alert's configuration. Static explanation only — for diagnosing a specific firing incident, use `signoz-investigating-alerts`.
Create a new SigNoz alert rule from a natural-language intent — threshold, anomaly, log-volume, error-rate, latency, or absent-data alerts across metrics, logs, traces, and exceptions. Make sure to use this skill whenever the user says "alert me when…", "notify me if…", "set up monitoring for…", "page me on…", "create an alert for…", or asks for a new alert/notification rule, even if they don't say the word "alert" explicitly. Also use it when someone asks to be notified about error rates, latency spikes, log volume, CPU/memory pressure, or anomalous behavior on a service or host.