Skill ディレクトリ

AI Agent のための再利用可能な Skill を見つける。

タスクで実際の GitHub Skill を検索し、利用前に Stars、Trust、監査、カテゴリ、インストール経路を確認できます。

すべての推奨は、リポジトリ、監査、インストール経路に明確につながっています。

検索結果: accuracy

英語版ディレクトリ

High accuracy RAG for answering questions from scientific documents with citations

8.7K
Stars
86/100
信頼
カテゴリ: data監査

Vendor-agnostic orchestration for training, inference and agentic workloads across NVIDIA, AMD, TPU, and Tenstorrent on clouds, Kubernetes, and bare metal.

2.2K
Stars
85/100
信頼
カテゴリ: agent-skills監査

State-of-the-Art Deep Learning scripts organized by models - easy to train and deploy with reproducible accuracy and performance on enterprise-grade infrastructure.

15K
Stars
72/100
信頼
カテゴリ: media-automation監査

Kodezi Chronos is a debugging-first language model that achieves state-of-the-art results on SWE-bench Lite (80.33%) and 67% real-world fix accuracy, over six times better than GPT-4. Built with Adaptive Graph-Guided Retrieval and Persistent Debug Memory. Model available Q1 2026 via Kodezi OS.

4.9K
Stars
73/100
信頼
カテゴリ: ml-automation監査

OpenSCA is an open source software supply chain security solution that supports the detection of open source dependencies, vulnerabilities and license compliance with a widely noticed accuracy by the community.

1.1K
Stars
77/100
信頼
カテゴリ: development監査

A collection of reusable AI agent skills for Flux CD and GitOps, enabling agents to generate manifests, audit repos, and debug clusters.

198
Stars
72/100
信頼
カテゴリ: coding-agents監査

This skill should be used for time series machine learning tasks including classification, regression, clustering, forecasting, anomaly detection, segmentation, and similarity search. Use when working with temporal data, sequential patterns, or time-indexed observations requiring specialized algorithms beyond standard ML approaches. Particularly suited for univariate and multivariate time series analysis with scikit-learn compatible APIs.

34K
Stars
80/100
信頼
カテゴリ: research監査

Autonomously improve a real artifact (code, training recipe, agent harness, data pipeline, prompt) against an objective and an evaluator, using Hypothesis Tree Refinement (HTR) from the Arbor paper. Use this whenever someone wants to iteratively optimize something over many experiments without overfitting — e.g. "get my model's eval score up", "improve this agent/harness", "tune this pipeline", "beat the baseline on this benchmark", "run a search over approaches and keep the best", "do an MLE-bench / Kaggle-style optimization", or any long-horizon "make this artifact better and don't just memorize the dev set" task. Trigger it even when the user doesn't say "Arbor" or "hypothesis tree" but describes repeated experiment-and-evaluate loops, branching exploration of competing ideas, or worries about a dev/test gap. Runs Claude itself as the coordinator with subagent executors in isolated git worktrees; for the standalone `arbor` CLI tool see references/arbor-upstream.md.

34K
Stars
77/100
信頼
カテゴリ: research監査

Plan, execute, and document validation, verification, and transfer of analytical procedures under the governing framework - ICH Q2(R2) and Q14, USP <1220>/<1225>/<1226>, ICH M10 bioanalytical, CLSI EP, or ISO/IEC 17025. Use for HPLC, LC-MS/MS, GC, CE, ICP-MS, dissolution, qNMR, qPCR, NIR, and ligand binding or cell-based assays whenever the question is whether a procedure is fit for its intended purpose. Triggers include "method validation", "analytical method validation", "AMV", "validation protocol", "acceptance criteria", "linearity", "reportable range", "accuracy and precision", "repeatability", "intermediate precision", "recovery", "LOD", "LOQ", "detection limit", "quantitation limit", "specificity", "robustness", "method transfer", "method comparison", "Deming", "Passing-Bablok", "Bland-Altman", "equivalence testing", "OOS investigation", "ICH Q2", "Q2(R2)", "Q14", "USP 1225", "ICH M10", "incurred sample reanalysis", "ISR", "CLSI EP", and any request to show that an assay works.

34K
Stars
67/100
信頼
カテゴリ: research監査

Optimize floating-point expressions for accuracy

879
Stars
67/100
信頼
カテゴリ: coding-agents監査

A minimal benchmark for scalability, speed and accuracy of commonly used open source implementations (R packages, Python scikit-learn, H2O, xgboost, Spark MLlib etc.) of the top machine learning algorithms for binary classification (random forests, gradient boosted trees, deep neural networks etc.).

1.9K
Stars
72/100
信頼
カテゴリ: ml-automation監査