test-collaboration Eval
=======================

Status: review
Score: 69/100
Risk: medium
Decision: manual_review
Policy: review
Reason: Test manually in an isolated workspace and compare against safer alternatives.

Install:
npx skills add qshanx/docs-governance --skill test-collaboration

Required checks:
- PASS Task fit: Task wording matches this skill metadata.
- PASS Install path: Install handoff is available.
- PASS Install command safety: standard package or runtime install path
- WARN Trust score: Potentially useful, but at least one trust signal needs human inspection.
- WARN Audit score: Needs review
- WARN Agent safety gate: Sparse or mixed signals. Useful for discovery, but not for autonomous installation.
- PASS License clarity: MIT
- WARN Permission surface: shell or command execution, database access

Warnings:
- Trust score: Potentially useful, but at least one trust signal needs human inspection.
- Audit score: Needs review
- Agent safety gate: Sparse or mixed signals. Useful for discovery, but not for autonomous installation.
- Permission surface: shell or command execution, database access
- High-risk permission hints: Shell or command execution
- SKILL.md references templates/TESTS.example.md, but the submitted skill directory only contains SKILL.md; the referenced template is missing or was not included.
- The workflow may run test commands to verify exit codes, but it does not explicitly instruct the agent to review commands before execution or avoid running unfamiliar/untested commands outside a safe environment.
- The skill reads Spec/Issue/Bug files that could contain untrusted or injected instructions, but it does not explicitly state that those files are data and must not override the skill's own governance rules.
- Quality score needs review
- Stars/forks activity: 127 stars, 3 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata

Validation plan:
1. Inspect repository, README/SKILL.md, license, and recent commits before production use.
2. Install in an isolated workspace or sandbox with no production secrets available.
3. Run the smallest representative task and record files touched, commands run, network access, and outputs.
4. Compare the selected skill against at least one alternative when the eval status is review or failed.
5. Promote only after the agent reports a successful verification result and unresolved warnings are accepted.

Do not use when:
- teams that need a vendor-supported SLA
- production agents without a repository review
- SKILL.md references templates/TESTS.example.md, but the submitted skill directory only contains SKILL.md; the referenced template is missing or was not included.
- High-risk permission hints: Shell or command execution
- The workflow may run test commands to verify exit codes, but it does not explicitly instruct the agent to review commands before execution or avoid running unfamiliar/untested commands outside a safe environment.
- The skill reads Spec/Issue/Bug files that could contain untrusted or injected instructions, but it does not explicitly state that those files are data and must not override the skill's own governance rules.
- Quality score needs review
- Stars/forks activity: 127 stars, 3 forks; issue activity unavailable in current metadata

URLs:
- Skill: https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/qshanx-test-collaboration
- Audit: https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/qshanx-test-collaboration/audit
- JSON: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/evals?slug=qshanx-test-collaboration