ads Eval
========

Status: review
Score: 62/100
Risk: medium
Decision: manual_review
Policy: review
Reason: Test manually in an isolated workspace and compare against safer alternatives.

Install:
npx skills add aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team --skill ads

Required checks:
- WARN Task fit: Task fit is weak; compare alternatives before selecting.
- PASS Install path: Install handoff is available.
- PASS Install command safety: standard package or runtime install path
- WARN Trust score: Potentially useful, but at least one trust signal needs human inspection.
- WARN Audit score: Needs review
- WARN Agent safety gate: Sparse or mixed signals. Useful for discovery, but not for autonomous installation.
- PASS License clarity: MIT
- WARN Permission surface: shell or command execution, network or browser access

Warnings:
- Task fit: Task fit is weak; compare alternatives before selecting.
- Trust score: Potentially useful, but at least one trust signal needs human inspection.
- Audit score: Needs review
- Agent safety gate: Sparse or mixed signals. Useful for discovery, but not for autonomous installation.
- README/SKILL.md completeness: Public metadata needs stronger README/SKILL.md context
- Permission surface: shell or command execution, network or browser access
- High-risk permission hints: Shell or command execution
- Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision
- The SKILL.md description has a formatting issue: the first line ends with 'Google, Meta' and the next line starts a new sentence, causing a truncated description in the metadata. This could be cleaned up for clarity.
- The skill relies on external references (benchmarks, bidding strategies, etc.) that are not fully included in the excerpt, but they are referenced as files in the repository. This is acceptable as long as they are present in the full submission.
- Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision.
- Quality score needs review

Validation plan:
1. Inspect repository, README/SKILL.md, license, and recent commits before production use.
2. Install in an isolated workspace or sandbox with no production secrets available.
3. Run the smallest representative task and record files touched, commands run, network access, and outputs.
4. Compare the selected skill against at least one alternative when the eval status is review or failed.
5. Promote only after the agent reports a successful verification result and unresolved warnings are accepted.

Do not use when:
- teams that need a vendor-supported SLA
- production agents without a repository review
- The SKILL.md description has a formatting issue: the first line ends with 'Google, Meta' and the next line starts a new sentence, causing a truncated description in the metadata. This could be cleaned up for clarity.
- High-risk permission hints: Shell or command execution
- Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision
- The skill relies on external references (benchmarks, bidding strategies, etc.) that are not fully included in the excerpt, but they are referenced as files in the repository. This is acceptable as long as they are present in the full submission.
- Financial research output is not financial advice; require human review before any live investment decision.
- Quality score needs review

URLs:
- Skill: https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/aaaaqwq-ads
- Audit: https://www.openagentskill.com/skills/aaaaqwq-ads/audit
- JSON: https://www.openagentskill.com/api/agent/evals?slug=aaaaqwq-ads